scholarly journals Analysis of airborne sound insulation and impact sound pressure level provided by a single partition containing a heterogeneity

2007 ◽  
Vol 300 (3-5) ◽  
pp. 800-816
Author(s):  
A. Pereira ◽  
A. Tadeu
Keyword(s):  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Insulation ◽  
Airborne Sound

scholarly journals Reducing the harmful effects of noise on the human environment. Sound insulation of industrial skeleton enclosures in the 10–40 kHz frequency range

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 1451-1463
Author(s):  
Witold Mikulski
Keyword(s):  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Sheet Steel ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Insulation ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Noise Sources ◽  
Human Environment ◽  
Absorbing Material ◽  
Acoustic Enclosures

Abstract Purpose The purpose of the research is to work out a method for determining the sound insulation of acoustic enclosures for industrial sources emitting noise in the frequency range of 10–40 kHz and apply the method to measure the sound insulation of acoustic enclosures build of different materials. Methods The method is developed by appropriate adaptation of techniques applicable currently for sound frequencies of up to 10 kHz. The sound insulation of example enclosures is determined with the use of this newly developed method. Results The research results indicate that enclosures (made of polycarbonate, plexiglass, sheet aluminium, sheet steel, plywood, and composite materials) enable reducing the sound pressure level in the environment for the frequency of 10 kHz by 19–25 dB with the reduction increasing to 40–48 dB for the frequency of 40 Hz. The sound insulation of acoustic enclosures with a sound-absorbing material inside reaches about 38 dB for the frequency of 10 kHz and about 63 dB for the frequency of 40 kHz. Conclusion Some pieces of equipment installed in the work environment are sources of noise emitted in the 10–40 kHz frequency range with the intensity which can be high enough to be harmful to humans. The most effective technical reduction of the associated risks are acoustic enclosures for such noise sources. The sound pressure level reduction obtained after provision of an enclosure depends on its design (shape, size, material, and thickness of walls) and the noise source frequency spectrum. Realistically available noise reduction values may exceed 60 dB.

Estimation of the Reduction in Impact Sound Pressure Level of Floating Floors from the Dynamic Stiffness of Insulation Layers

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.A. Metzen
Keyword(s):  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Dynamic Stiffness ◽  
Measurement Procedure ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Insulation ◽  
Relevant Parameter ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Surface Mass ◽  
Acoustical Properties

The most relevant parameter for assessing the acoustical properties of insulation layers for floating floor applications is the dynamic stiffness. Besides the surface mass of the floor plate the dynamic stiffness influences the reduction in impact sound pressure level of a floating floor. According to the formerly German measurement standard DIN 52214 the dynamic stiffness of impact sound insulation materials had to be measured after applying a short-term pre-load of 50 kNm−2. This pre-load does not reflect the conditions in the field and has been withdrawn in EN 29052-I. By comparison of measured field data for floor constructions with estimated data based on measurements with and without pre-load it is shown, that the new measurement procedure in connection with a more detailed estimation of the building element properties leads to a more accurate prediction of impact sound insulation in dwellings.

Experimental Visualization of Sound Pressure Level and Vibration Around a Soundproof Barrier

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumio Shimizu ◽  
Kazuhiro Tanaka ◽  
Koji Yamamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Shigefuji
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Source ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Heat Radiation ◽  
Sound Insulation ◽  
Vibration Displacement ◽  
The One ◽  
The Relationship

The noise and vibration control are the one of important issues. A soundproof barrier, which covers a sound source with sound absorbing materials, is very useful for the noise reduction. When large noise and high temperature heat emit from the sound source, we must also consider the heat radiation as well as the noise reduction. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relationship between sound pressure level and vibration on a soundproof barrier around a sound source. The effect of heat radiation hole on the sound insulation performance of the soundproof barrier is also investigated. The sound pressure level and the vibration displacement were similarly distributed on the surface of the barrier. Therefore, the vibration of the barrier was strongly influenced to the sound pressure level of the transmitted sound.

Structure-borne sound in buildings: Advances in measurement and prediction methods

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Marshall Gibbs ◽  
Michel Villot
Keyword(s):  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Sound Insulation ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Source Data ◽  
Sound Reduction ◽  
The Impact

This article coincides with recent publications of international standards, which provide methods of predicting the performance of both heavyweight and lightweight buildings in terms of airborne sound insulation and impact sound isolation, from the performance of individual elements such as walls and floors. The performances of the elements are characterized by the sound reduction index and the impact sound pressure level. To predict the sound pressure level due to vibrating sources (i.e., mechanical installations, water services and other appliances), source data are required in a form appropriate as input for prediction models similar to the above, i.e., as equivalent single quantities and frequency band-averaged values. Three quantities are required for estimating the structure-borne power for a wide range of installation conditions: activity (the free velocity or the blocked force of the operating source), source mobility (or the inverse, impedance) and receiver mobility (or impedance) of the connected building element. Methods are described for obtaining these source quantities, including by using laboratory reception plates. The article concludes with a proposed database, based on laboratory measurements and simple mobility calculations, which provides a practical approach to predicting structureborne sound in buildings.

Pressure Level Standard Deviation at Low Frecuencies: Effect of the Wall Vibrational Field

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 561-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
María A. Navacerrada ◽  
Cesar Díaz ◽  
Antonio Pedrero
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Spatial Variation ◽  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Insulation ◽  
Uncertainty Of Measurement ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Sound Fields ◽  
Combined Uncertainty

Abstract Knowledge of the uncertainty of measurement of testing results is important when results have to be compared with limits and specifications. In the measurement of sound insulation following standards ISO 140-4 and 140-5 the uncertainty of the final magnitude is mainly associated to the average sound pressure levels L1 and L2 measured. However, the study of sound fields in enclosed spaces is very difficult: there are a wide variety of rooms with different sound fields depending on factors as volume, geometry and materials. A parameter what allows us to quantify the spatial variation of the sound pressure level is the standard deviation of the pressure levels measured at the different positions of the room. Based on the analysis of this parameter some results have been pointed out: we show examples on the influence of the microphone positions and the wall characteristics on the uncertainty of the final magnitudes mainly at the low frequencies regime. In this line, we propose a theoretical calculus of the standard deviation as a combined uncertainty of the standard deviation already proposed in the literature focused in the room geometry and the standard deviation associated to the wall vibrational field.

scholarly journals Validation of the Low-Frequency Procedure for Field Measurement of Façade Sound Insulation

Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
Jinyu Liu ◽  
Naohisa Inoue ◽  
Tetsuya Sakuma
Keyword(s):  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Field Measurement ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Central Zone ◽  
Maximum Level ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Insulation ◽  
Specific Instruction ◽  
Wooden House

In the ISO 16283 series for field measurement of sound insulation, a low-frequency procedure is specified for determining indoor average sound pressure level, which is the so-called corner method. In the procedure, additional measurements are required in the corners in addition to the default measurements in the central zone, and the indoor average level is corrected with the highest level in the corners. However, this procedure was empirically proposed, and its validity is not fully examined for façade sound insulation. In this paper, detailed experiments were performed in a mock lightweight wooden house for validating the low-frequency procedure for façade sound insulation measurement. The results suggest that a correction with energy-averaging level of all corners is more reliable than with the maximum level, and the uncertainty in the default procedure is sufficiently improved with additional measurements in four non-adjacent corners. Moreover, the effect of the detailed position of the microphone around the corner was clarified for a more specific instruction.

Contributions of Voice and Nonverbal Communication to Perceived Masculinity–Femininity for Cisgender and Transgender Communicators

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 931-947
Author(s):  
Teresa L. D. Hardy ◽  
Carol A. Boliek ◽  
Daniel Aalto ◽  
Justin Lewicke ◽  
Kristopher Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fundamental Frequency ◽  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Vocal Tract ◽  
Presentation Mode ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Presentation Modes ◽  
Audiovisual Stimuli ◽  
Vocal Tract Resonance ◽  
Point Light

Purpose The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify a set of communication-based predictors (including both acoustic and gestural variables) of masculinity–femininity ratings and (b) to explore differences in ratings between audio and audiovisual presentation modes for transgender and cisgender communicators. Method The voices and gestures of a group of cisgender men and women ( n = 10 of each) and transgender women ( n = 20) communicators were recorded while they recounted the story of a cartoon using acoustic and motion capture recording systems. A total of 17 acoustic and gestural variables were measured from these recordings. A group of observers ( n = 20) rated each communicator's masculinity–femininity based on 30- to 45-s samples of the cartoon description presented in three modes: audio, visual, and audio visual. Visual and audiovisual stimuli contained point light displays standardized for size. Ratings were made using a direct magnitude estimation scale without modulus. Communication-based predictors of masculinity–femininity ratings were identified using multiple regression, and analysis of variance was used to determine the effect of presentation mode on perceptual ratings. Results Fundamental frequency, average vowel formant, and sound pressure level were identified as significant predictors of masculinity–femininity ratings for these communicators. Communicators were rated significantly more feminine in the audio than the audiovisual mode and unreliably in the visual-only mode. Conclusions Both study purposes were met. Results support continued emphasis on fundamental frequency and vocal tract resonance in voice and communication modification training with transgender individuals and provide evidence for the potential benefit of modifying sound pressure level, especially when a masculine presentation is desired.

Case study: Theoretical calculation model and variable condition analysis research on the water-splashing noise for natural draft wet cooling towers

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Yang Zhouo ◽  
Ming Gao ◽  
Suoying He ◽  
Yuetao Shi ◽  
Fengzhong Sun
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Sound Pressure Level ◽  
Water Droplet ◽  
Water Distribution ◽  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Cooling Tower ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Calculation Model ◽  
Pressure Level ◽  
Cooling Towers

Based on the basic theory of water droplets impact noise, the generation mechanism and calculation model of the water-splashing noise for natural draft wet cooling towers were established in this study, and then by means of the custom software, the water-splashing noise was studied under different water droplet diameters and water-spraying densities as well as partition water distribution patterns conditions. Comparedwith the water-splashing noise of the field test, the average difference of the theoretical and the measured value is 0.82 dB, which validates the accuracy of the established theoretical model. The results based on theoretical model showed that, when the water droplet diameters are smaller in cooling tower, the attenuation of total sound pressure level of the water-splashing noise is greater. From 0 m to 8 m away from the cooling tower, the sound pressure level of the watersplashing noise of 3 mm and 6 mm water droplets decreases by 8.20 dB and 4.36 dB, respectively. Additionally, when the water-spraying density becomes twice of the designed value, the sound pressure level of water-splashing noise all increases by 3.01 dB for the cooling towers of 300 MW, 600 MW and 1000 MW units. Finally, under the partition water distribution patterns, the change of the sound pressure level is small. For the R s/2 and Rs/3 partition radius (Rs is the radius of water-spraying area), when the water-spraying density ratio between the outer and inner zone increases from 1 to 3, the sound pressure level of water-splashing noise increases by 0.7 dB and 0.3 dB, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document