Serial Prostate Biopsies are Associated With an Increased Risk of Erectile Dysfunction in Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance

142 Background: To evaluate the clinical variables associated with upgrading at confirmatory biopsy among a racially-diverse group of men with prostate cancer (PCa) who elect Active Surveillance (AS). Methods: Following IRB approval, of the more than 260 men from our multi-institutional prospective AS database we identified 140 that had undergone at least 1 confirmatory biopsy since their initial diagnosis. Patients whose diagnosis was made on TURP, had any Gleason 4 on their initial biopsy or whose initial and confirmatory biopsy were more than 2 years apart were excluded. The analysis cohort included 121 men who had Gleason Score ≤ 6, clinical stage ≤ T2a and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL. Disease upgrading on confirmatory biopsy was Gleason score ≥ 7. Multiple variables were examined as univariate and MV predictors of upgrading. Results: We identified 121 men who fit inclusion criteria, 55 (45%) African Americans (AA) and 66 non-AA (55%) with a median follow-up of 22 months. The median age was 66, median number of biopsy cores taken at diagnostic biopsy was 12 and median time interval between diagnostic and confirmatory biopsy was 12 months. On confirmatory biopsy, no evidence of disease was noted for 51 (42%) men (26 AA, 25 non-AA), 48 (40%) men (18, AA, 30 non-AA) had findings consistent with their initial biopsy and 22 men (11 AA, 11 non-AA) experienced upgrading at repeat biopsy. Of the 22 (18%) men who were upgraded, 18 (8 AA, 10 non-AA) upgraded to a Gleason score of 7, 3 (2 AA, 1 non-AA) were upgraded to a Gleason score of 8 and 1 (AA) had a Gleason score of 9. In univariate analysis AA race was associated with a greater number of positive cores (p = 0.04) and greater total prostate volume (p = 0.03) at confirmatory biopsy. Multivariate analysis was performed and none of the clinical variables examined (race, age, BMI, PSA, volume, PSAD, number of positive cores, total number of cores, percentage of positive cores, time between biopsies) were associated with upgrading on repeat biopsy. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that race is not associated with an increased risk of upgrading at confirmatory biopsy. AA with low-risk PCa are reasonable candidates for inclusion in most AS protocols and should not be excluded based on race alone.

Download Full-text

Is BMI a risk factor for active surveillance progression in patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-Trus fusion biopsy?

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.124 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. 124-124 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kareem Rayn ◽

Samuel Gold ◽

Graham R. Hale ◽

Joey Baiocco ◽

Jonathan Bloom ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Risk Factor ◽

Active Surveillance ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Normal Weight ◽

Fusion Biopsy ◽

Patient Demographics ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Risk Of Progression ◽

The Impact

124 Background: MRI−TRUS fusion biopsy (FBx) use in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) results in a more accurate assessment of disease burden and has increasingly been incorporated into urologic practice. In addition, with more men choosing active surveillance (AS) and the reports of increased PCa aggressiveness with obesity, we wanted to study the impact of obesity on the risk of PCa progression in men on AS diagnosed and followed by MRI and MRI−TRUS FBx. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively maintained database of all men who underwent MRI−TRUS FBx at our institution from January 2007 to May 2015. Patient demographics, clinical data, imaging, pathology, treatment and outcomes were recorded. Patients who enrolled on AS were stratified by BMI into normal weight (BMI 18.5−24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0−29.9), and obese (BMI ≥ 30.0). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results: 204 men were enrolled in AS. Within the AS cohort, 51 (25%) had a normal weight, 101 (49.5%) were overweight, and 52 (25.5%) were obese. Age, BMI, PSA and mean estimated progression free survival time are described for each of these groups in Table 1. The overall rate of progression was 32.8%. Of the patients who progressed, 18 (26.9%) were normal weight, 32 (15.7%) were overweight and 17 (25.4%) were obese. On multivariate analysis, BMI was not a risk factor for AS progression, HR = 1.00 (p = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.95−1.06). Conclusions: There is evidence of increased risk of aggressive PCa specific death in obese patients. However, we demonstrate that in patients diagnosed by FBx, obesity does not confer an additional risk of progression on AS. This may be due to the improved characterization of cancer volume and grade by MRI−TRUS fusion biopsy. Further study is required to determine risk factors for AS progression in patients undergoing FBx. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Medical Research Scholars Program.

Download Full-text