Re: Long-Term Disease-Specific Functioning Among Prostate Cancer Survivors and Noncancer Controls in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 189 (2) ◽  
pp. 528-529
Author(s):  
Samir S. Taneja
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. 2768-2775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn L. Taylor ◽  
George Luta ◽  
Anthony B. Miller ◽  
Timothy R. Church ◽  
Scott P. Kelly ◽  
...  

Purpose Within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO), we assessed the long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors versus noncancer controls, the impact of trial arm (screening/usual care) on functioning, and the effect of treatment modality on functioning. Patients and Methods PCa survivors (n = 529), 5 to 10 years postdiagnosis, were frequency-matched to noncancer controls (n = 514) for race, screening center, year of enrollment, and trial arm. Participants completed a telephone interview regarding PCa-specific symptomatology. Weights accounted for patient selection from the five PLCO screening centers. Propensity-score methods were used to balance groups of interest with respect to demographic and medical characteristics. Results Weighted linear regression analyses revealed poorer sexual and urinary function among PCa survivors compared with noncancer controls (P < .001). Trial arm was not significantly related to any outcome (P > .31). Compared with radical prostatectomy patients (n = 201), radiation-therapy patients (n = 110) reported better sexual (P < .05) and urinary (P < .001) functioning but poorer bowel outcomes (P < .05). Survivors who received treatment combinations including androgen deprivation (n = 207) reported significantly poorer hormone-related symptoms compared with radical prostatectomy patients (P < .05). Conclusion This study demonstrated the persistence of clinically significant, long-term PCa treatment-related sexual and urinary adverse effects up to 10 years postdiagnosis. To our knowledge, this was the first comparison of prostate-related dysfunction among screened survivors versus screened noncancer controls and indicated that these long-term problems were attributable to PCa treatment and not to aging or comorbidities. Finally, differences in long-term adverse effects between treatment modalities are particularly relevant for patients and clinicians when making treatment decisions.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Robert Thomas ◽  
Basma Greef ◽  
Alex McConnachie ◽  
Bethany Stanley ◽  
Madeleine Williams

Abstract Tea contains polyphenols such as flavonoids, anthocyanidins, flavanols and phenolic acids which in laboratory studies have reported to promote antioxidant enzyme formation, reduces excess inflammation, slow cancer cell proliferation and promote apoptosis. Evidence from epidemiological studies, on the effect of tea consumption on CaP incidence has been conflicting. We analysed data from 25 097 men within the intervention arm of the 155000 participant Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial screening trial. Histologically confirmed cases of prostate cancer were reported in 3,088 men (12.3%) during the median 11.5 year follow up. Tea consumption was assessed with a food frequency questionnaire. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Cox regression models were used to assess associations between tea intake and CaP incidence. There was no statistical difference between the risk of CaP between men who never drank tea to those who drank tea at any quantity. Amongst tea drinkers, those in the highest third of consumption group had a small but significantly lower risk compared to those in the lowest third (11.2% v 13.2% HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.05-1.29, p=0.004). This pattern persisted with adjustments for demographics and lifestyle. In conclusion, among tea drinkers, there was a small positive association between drinking tea and a reduced risk of prostate cancer. It does not support starting to drink tea, if men previously did not, to reduce the risk. Further research is needed to establish whether tea is justified for future prospective nutritional intervention studies investigating CaP prevention.


Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (17) ◽  
pp. 2965-2974
Author(s):  
Paul F. Pinsky ◽  
Amanda Black ◽  
Sarah E. Daugherty ◽  
Robert Hoover ◽  
Howard Parnes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document