Re: Evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association Renal Cell Carcinoma Surveillance Guidelines

2015 ◽  
Vol 194 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
M. Pilar Laguna
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (36) ◽  
pp. 4059-4065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne B. Stewart ◽  
R. Houston Thompson ◽  
Sarah P. Psutka ◽  
John C. Cheville ◽  
Christine M. Lohse ◽  
...  

Purpose The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Urological Association (AUA) provide guidelines for surveillance after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Herein, we assess the ability of the guidelines to capture RCC recurrences and determine the duration of surveillance required to capture 90%, 95%, and 100% of recurrences. Patients and Methods We evaluated 3,651 patients who underwent surgery for M0 RCC between 1970 and 2008. Patients were stratified as AUA low risk (pT1Nx-0) after partial (LR-partial) or radical nephrectomy (LR-radical) or as moderate/high risk (M/HR; pT2-4Nx-0/pTanyN1). Guidelines were assessed by calculating the percentage of recurrences detected when following the 2013 and 2014 NCCN and AUA recommendations, and associated Medicare costs were compared. Results At a median follow-up of 9.0 years (interquartile range, 5.7 to 14.4 years), a total of 1,088 patients (29.8%) experienced a recurrence. Of these, 390 recurrences (35.9%) were detected using 2013 NCCN recommendations, 742 recurrences (68.2%) were detected using 2014 NCCN recommendations, and 728 recurrences (66.9%) were detected using AUA recommendations. All protocols missed the greatest amount of recurrences in the abdomen and among pT1Nx-0 patients. To capture 95% of recurrences, surveillance was required for 15 years for LR-partial, 21 years for LR-radical, and 14 years for M/HR patients. Medicare surveillance costs for one LR-partial patient were $1,228.79 using 2013 NCCN, $2,131.52 using 2014 NCCN, and $1,738.31 using AUA guidelines. However, if 95% of LR-partial recurrences were captured, costs would total $9,856.82. Conclusion If strictly followed, the 2014 NCCN and AUA guidelines will miss approximately one third of RCC recurrences. Improved surveillance algorithms, which balance patient benefits and health care costs, are needed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
R.A. Goranova ◽  
B.B. Goranov ◽  
I.D. Pedley ◽  
A. Azzabi ◽  
A. Humphreys ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 455-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Allison Goranova ◽  
Bojidar Bojidarov Goranov ◽  
Ian David Pedley ◽  
Ashraf Azzabi ◽  
Alison Humphreys ◽  
...  

455 Background: Sunitinib gained NICE approval in March 2009 as first line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and UK experience of use of Sunitinib is growing. The North of England Cancer Network (NECN) was the first cancer network in the UK to approve the use of Sunitinib in July 2007 and has the longest UK experience with this drug. The clinical outcomes of the NECN patients are presented. Methods: Data was collected and analysed regarding all patients started on Sunitinib from 01/07/2007 to 30/09/2010. Follow up extended to 28/02/2011. Previously published predictors of response were compared to the NECN data to check applicability in this population. Results: 129 patients were identified with a median age of 63 years (range 21-87), 67% were male and WHO performance status was 0, 1 or 2 (33%, 51%, 16%). 80% of patients had nephrectomy (60% radical) and 22% had prior systemic treatment. Median PFS was 10 months (range 0.25-27). Median OS (from Sunitinib initiation) was 17 months (range 0.25 - 47). Performance status was significantly associated with PFS and OS. The median number of treatment cycles was 5 (range 0.25-27). 64% of patients were dose reduced and 9% had a schedule modification to minimise toxicity. 21% of patients had a delay of 4 weeks or more which was not detrimental to median PFS. Dose reduction at treatment initiation was associated with a significant decrease in OS. 11.6% of patients required treatment for hypothyroidism which was associated with a significant improvement in PFS and OS. 15.5% of patients required treatment for hypertension, which was associated with an improvement in OS, but not PFS. Conclusions: PFS in the NECN population is similar to trial data. Strategies to deal with side effects, including dose reduction (after treatment initiation), treatment delay and schedule changes, did not adversely affect PFS. Performance status 0, the development of new hypertension or new hypothyroidism can be regarded as markers of good prognosis in this population. Initial dose reduction should be avoided as this adversely affects prognosis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Marco Roscigno ◽  
Roberto Bertini ◽  
Cesare Cozzarini ◽  
Alessandra Pasta ◽  
Mattia Sangalli ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Brian L. Egleston ◽  
Ismail R. Saad ◽  
Robert G. Uzzo

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 305-305
Author(s):  
Richard A. Ashley ◽  
Jonathan C. Routh ◽  
Sameer A. Siddiqui ◽  
Brant A. Inman ◽  
Thomas J. Sebo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 303-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Klatte ◽  
Heiko Wunderlich ◽  
Jean-Jacques Patard ◽  
Mark D. Kleid ◽  
John S. Lam ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 301-301
Author(s):  
Yasumasa Iimura ◽  
Kazutaka Saito ◽  
Minato Yokoyama ◽  
Hitoshi Masuda ◽  
Tsuyoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document