scholarly journals MP16-15 T-STAGE MIGRATION WITH ROUTINE MRI STAGING MAY IMPACT ON RISK ASSESSMENT WITH CURRENT RISK CALCULATORS

2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taimur T Shah ◽  
Max Peters ◽  
Enrique Gomez-Gomez ◽  
Hashim U. Ahmed ◽  
Mathias Winkler
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Mri Staging ◽  
Current Risk

1957. T-Stage Migration by Routine Pre-Biopsy MRI Staging May Affect Risk Assessment with Current Risk Classification Systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1834-1835
Author(s):  
Na Hyun Kim ◽  
Daniel Ball ◽  
Taimur Shah ◽  
Max Peters ◽  
Saiful Miah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
T Stage ◽  
Mri Staging ◽  
Current Risk

Validity of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI) and the Norton-MI scale in critically ill patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 76-82
Author(s):  
Sara Lospitao-Gómez ◽  
Tomás Sebastián-Viana ◽  
José M. González-Ruíz ◽  
Joaquín Álvarez-Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Pressure Ulcers ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Current Risk

scholarly journals Current Risk Assessment Frameworks Misjudge Risks of Hydrophobic Chemicals

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1690-1692
Author(s):  
Henriette Selck ◽  
Valery E. Forbes
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Current Risk

scholarly journals How current risk assessment and risk management methods for drinking water in The Netherlands cover the WHO water safety plan approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 222 (7) ◽  
pp. 1030-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H.J.L. van den Berg ◽  
L. Friederichs ◽  
J.F.M. Versteegh ◽  
P.W.M.H. Smeets ◽  
A.M. de Roda Husman
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Water Safety ◽  
Safety Plan ◽  
Water Safety Plan ◽  
Current Risk

Cell-cycle Progression-score Might Improve the Current Risk Assessment in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients

Urology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Oderda ◽  
Gabriele Cozzi ◽  
Lorenzo Daniele ◽  
Anna Sapino ◽  
Stefania Munegato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Current Risk

An examination of the Environmental Protection Agency risk assessment principles and practices: a brief commentary on section 4.1.3 of the EPA March 2004 Staff Paper

2006 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
K A Mundt
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Environmental Protection Agency ◽  
Default Risk ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Protection Agency ◽  
Risk Models ◽  
The Us ◽  
Agency Risk ◽  
Current Risk

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently issued a Staff Paper that articulates current risk assessment practices. In section 4.1.3, EPA states,“...effects that appear to be adaptive, non–adverse, or beneficial may not be mentioned.” This statement may be perceived as precluding risk assessments based on non–default risk models, including the hormetic–or biphasicdose–response model. This commentary examines several potential interpretations of this statement and the anticipated impact of ignoring hormesis, if present, in light of necessary conservatism for protecting human and environmental health, and the potential for employing alternative risk assessment approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document