scholarly journals Improving the Contribution of Regulatory Assessment Reports to Health Technology Assessments—A Collaboration between the European Medicines Agency and the European network for Health Technology Assessment

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 634-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Berntgen ◽  
Anne Gourvil ◽  
Mira Pavlovic ◽  
Wim Goettsch ◽  
Hans-Georg Eichler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
European Network ◽  
Regulatory Assessment ◽  
Assessment Reports

scholarly journals Developing a quality management system for the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA): toward European HTA collaboration

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Luhnen ◽  
Sari Susanna Ormstad ◽  
Anne Willemsen ◽  
Chaienna Schreuder-Morel ◽  
Catharina Helmink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Management ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Management System ◽  
Quality Management System ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
European Network ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Working Groups ◽  
Assessment Reports

Abstract Objectives The European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) was established in 2006 and comprises over eighty organizations from thirty European countries. In its fifth project phase (Joint Action 3), EUnetHTA set up a quality management system (QMS) to improve the efficiency and standardization of joint work. This article presents EUnetHTA's new QMS and outlines experiences and challenges during its implementation. Methods Several working groups defined processes and methods to support assessment teams in creating high-quality assessment reports. Existing guidelines, templates, and tools were refined and missing parts were newly created and integrated into the new QMS framework. EUnetHTA has contributed to Health Technology Assessment (HTA) capacity building through training and knowledge sharing. Continuous evaluation helped to identify gaps and shortcomings in processes and structures. Results Based on a common quality management concept and defined development and revision procedures, twenty-seven partner organizations jointly developed and maintained around forty standard operating procedures and other components of the QMS. All outputs were incorporated into a web-based platform, the EUnetHTA Companion Guide, which was launched in May 2018. Concerted efforts of working groups were required to ensure consistency and avoid duplication. Conclusions With the establishment of a QMS for jointly produced assessment reports, EUnetHTA has taken a significant step toward a sustainable model for scientific and technical collaboration within European HTA. However, the definition of processes and methods meeting the numerous requirements of healthcare systems across Europe remains an ongoing and challenging task.

scholarly journals The Role of Regulator-Imposed Post-Approval Studies in Health Technology Assessments for Conditionally Approved Drugs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick A. Vreman ◽  
Lourens T. Bloem ◽  
Stijn van Oirschot ◽  
Jarno Hoekman ◽  
Menno E. van der Elst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
European Network ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Approved Drugs

Background: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) aims to resolve uncertainties associated with conditionally approved drugs by imposing post-approval studies. Results from these studies may be relevant for health technology assessment (HTA) organizations. This study investigated the role of regulator-imposed post-approval studies within HTA. Methods: For all conditionally approved drugs up to December 2018, regulator-imposed post-approval studies were identified from EMA’s public assessment reports. The availability for and inclusion of study results in relative effectiveness (re)assessments were analyzed for 4 European HTA organizations: NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, England/Wales), HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé, France), ZIN (Zorginstituut Nederland, the Netherlands) and the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA, Europe). When study results became available between an HTA organization’s initial assessment and reassessment, it was evaluated whether and how they affected the assessment and its outcome. Results: For 36 conditionally approved drugs, 98 post-approval studies were imposed. In total, 81 initial relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) and 13 reassessments were available, with numbers of drugs (re)assessed varying greatly between jurisdictions. Study results were available for 16 initial REAs (20%) and included in 14 (88%), and available for 10 reassessments (77%) and included in all (100%). Five reassessments had an outcome different from the initial REA, with 4 (2 positive and 2 negative changes) relating directly to the new study results. Reassessments often cited the inability of post-approval studies to resolve the concerns reported in the initial REA. Conclusion: Results from regulator-imposed post-approval studies for conditionally approved drugs were not often used in REAs by HTA organizations, because they were often not yet available at the time of initial assessment and because reassessments were scarce. When available, results from post-approval studies were almost always used within HTA, and they have led to changes in conclusions about drugs’ relative effectiveness. Post-approval studies can be relevant within HTA but the current lack of alignment between regulators and HTA organizations limits their potential.

scholarly journals The adaptation of health technology assessment reports: Identification of the need for, and development of, a toolkit to aid the process

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S2) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Turner ◽  
Deborah L. Chase ◽  
Ruairidh Milne ◽  
Andrew Cook ◽  
Nicholas J. Hicks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
Previous Experience ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
European Network ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Assessment Reports

Objectives: Europe has many health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, each producing their own HTA reports. Adapting HTA reports for different contexts could reduce the need for multiple reports on the same health technology with resultant saving of time and resources. This study aims to examine and understand the process of adaptation, and to develop a toolkit that would help the adaptation of reports produced by other countries.Methods: The methods used were a review of the literature; a survey of twenty-nine European HTA organizations, two rounds of a Delphi survey, a face-to-face meeting of twenty-one European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) representatives, iterative rounds of review, and two rounds of quality assurance testing (termed applicability testing).Results: Descriptions of previous examples of adaptation in the literature are sparse. Most respondents had previous experience in adapting reports, and all believed that adaptation was useful, and there was the ability to benefit from the use of a toolkit to aid in the process. EUnetHTA Partners developed and tested an adaptation toolkit. The toolkit is composed of a series of checklists and resources that identify or clarify the relevance, reliability, and transferability of data and information from existing reports.Conclusions: Consensus of opinion from twenty-nine European organizations/networks has indicated that the adaptation of HTA reports would be desirable and beneficial. A toolkit was developed to help with the adaptation of HTA reports produced in other settings. This collection of resources is available for use by all HTA agencies and can be accessed at: http://www.eunethta.net/upload/WP5/EUnetHTA_HTA_Adaptation_Toolkit_October08.pdf.

The fourth edition of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment Forum: highlights and outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Tafuri ◽  
Chantal Bélorgey ◽  
Carlo Favaretti ◽  
Edith Frénoy ◽  
Flora Giorgio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Joint Production ◽  
European Network ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Patient Organizations ◽  
Medical Need ◽  
To Receive

The European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) organizes an annual Forum with stakeholders to receive feedback on its activities, processes, and outputs produced. The fourth edition of the EUnetHTA Forum brought together representatives of HTA bodies, patient organizations, healthcare professionals (HCPs), academia, payers, regulators, and industry. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the highlights presented at the 2019 EUnetHTA Forum, reporting the main items and themes discussed in the plenary panel and breakout sessions. The leading topic was the concept of unmet medical need seen from different stakeholders' perspectives. Breakout sessions covered the joint production of assessment reports and engagement with payers, patients, and HCPs. Synergies, pragmatism, and inclusiveness across Member States and stakeholders were emphasized as leading factors to put in place a collaboration that serves the interest of patients and public health in a truly European spirit.

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE ON E-HEALTH/M-HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES: EVALUATING THE TRANSPARENCY AND THOROUGHNESS

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Vukovic ◽  
Carlo Favaretti ◽  
Walter Ricciardi ◽  
Chiara de Waure
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Core Model ◽  
Social Aspects ◽  
European Network ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Research Questions

Objectives:Evaluation is crucial for integration of e-Health/m-Health into healthcare systems and health technology assessment (HTA) could offer sound methodological basis for these evaluations. Aim of this study was to look for HTA reports on e-Health/m-Health technologies and to analyze their transparency, consistency and thoroughness, with the goal to detect areas that need improvement.Methods:PubMed, ISI-WOS, and University of York – Centre for Reviews and Dissemination–electronic databases were searched to identify reports on e-Health/m-Health technologies, published up until April 1, 2016. The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) checklist was used to evaluate transparency and consistency of included reports. Thoroughness was assessed by checking the presence of domains suggested by the European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) HTA Core Model.Results:Twenty-eight reports published between 1999 and 2015 were included. Most were delivered by non-European countries (71.4 percent) and only 35.7 percent were classified as full reports. All the HTA reports defined the scope of research whereas more than 80 percent provided author details, summary, discussed findings, and conclusion. On the contrary, policy and research questions were clearly defined in around 30 percent and 50 percent of reports. With respect to the EUnetHTA Core Model, around 70 percent of reports dealt with effectiveness and economic evaluation, more than 50 percent described health problem and approximately 40 percent organizational and social aspects.Conclusions:E-Health/m-Health technologies are increasingly present in the field of HTA. Yet, our review identified several missing elements. Most of the reports failed to respond to relevant assessment components, especially ethical, social and organizational implications.

Az egészségügyi technológiaértékelés múltja, jelene és jövője – nemzetközi perspektívából

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-41
Author(s):  
Péter Szegner
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Core Model ◽  
European Network

Az egészségügy finanszírozása és fenntarthatósága kapcsán kiemelt fontosságú a bizonyítékokon alapuló döntéshozatal. Napjaink diszruptív trendjei – például a digitalizáció, az adatvezérelt rendszerek, és természetesen a COVID-19 járvány – illetve az egészségügyi rendszerek átalakulása következtében kiemelt szerep juthat a multidiszciplináris egészségügyi technológiaértékelés (Health Technology Assessment, HTA) területének. Magyar országon 2004 óta működik a HTA-val kapcsolatos feladatokat ellátó, társadalombiztosítási befogadási folyamatban döntéstámogató szereppel bíró Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet Technológia-értékelő Főosztálya (TÉF). Európai szinten a European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) tekinthető az egyik legnagyobb volumenű nemzetközi kezdeményezésnek a területen, mely 2021-ben 29 országból 81 szervezetet ölelt fel. Az EUnetHTA számos eszköze és közös értékelése segíti a tagállamokat, ennek keretében jött létre a HTA Core Model, a gyártókkal folytatott korai tudományos konzultációk, vagy a befogadást követő tudományos bizonyítékok előállítását célzó pilotok. A jövőt illetően kiemelendő, hogy 2021 második felét követően jelentős átalakulás veszi kezdetét az európai technológiaértékelésben – így az EUnetHTA hálózat évtizedes együttműködése nem folytatódik tovább jelen formájában. Az átalakulás egyik fő hajtóereje az Európai Parlament és az Európai Unió Tanácsa által 2021 júniusában elfogadott HTA szabályozás. Az EUnetHTA által kidolgozott jövőbeli HTA együttműködés modellje (FMC) és az elmúlt 15 év nemzetközi tapasztalatai alapján állítható, hogy az ellátórendszerben megjelenő számos lehetőségre és kihívásra megfelelő választ tud majd adni az európai HTA közösség. A végső cél pedig továbbra is a betegek számára hozzáférhető és fenntartható egészségügyi szolgáltatások biztosítása, illetve a társadalom egészségi állapotának javítása lesz.

VP67 The Value Of The European Network For Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Outputs For National Health Technology Assessment: The French Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Irena Guzina ◽  
François Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Joint Action ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Specific Work ◽  
European Network ◽  
Know How ◽  
French Experience ◽  
Methodological Guidelines

INTRODUCTION:The French National Authority for Health (HAS) has participated in the work of the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) since its creation in 2006. HAS has been an active partner in most EUnetHTA activities, and the lead partner of specific work packages.METHODS:This report presents a summary of the main contribution of HAS to the two latest EUnetHTA projects (Joint Action (JA) 1 and Joint Action 2 (JA2)), their impact on national production, and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) doers feedback as to the opportunities and challenges of participating to the network and using its outputs.RESULTS:In JA 1 and JA 2 projects, HAS has: coordinated activities related to Early Dialogues and Additional Evidence Generation; coordinated the development of nine JA1 methodological guidelines for rapid relative effectiveness assessment (REA) of pharmaceuticals; participated in the production of two JA2 methodological guidelines; participated in the production of one JA1 and seven JA2 rapid REA reports, and two JA2 full HTAs.The national uptake of EUnetHTA outputs included entire adoptation of one REA report and adaptation of another. EUnetHTA templates and methodological guidelines have been taken into account when updating or developing national ones. Thanks to the network, HAS HTA doers could exchange on ongoing assessments with European colleagues, have enhanced their methodological know-how and enlarged their professional network.As for the challenges encountered, it turned out that the re-use of EUnetHTA reports for a technology of interest to HAS was not always possible, mainly due to discordances in deadlines or assessment questions between EUnetHTA and national productions.CONCLUSIONS:HAS has actively participated in different EUnetHTA projects since the network's creation. This collaboration has enabled HAS HTA doers, among others, to optimize national assessments and enhance their methodological know-how.

PP14 Development Of The European Network For Health Technology Assessment Standards Tool For Registries In Health Technology Assessment

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Gimenez Garcia ◽  
Mireia Espallargues ◽  
Jae Long ◽  
Maja Valentic ◽  
Irena Guzina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Registry Data ◽  
European Network ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
The Third ◽  
Evidence Quality ◽  
Evidence Generation

Introduction:Bridging gaps between registry-holders, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) producers and users is one of the aims of the European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) Joint Action 3. In this context, a post-launch evidence generation tool is being developed, including a quality standards tool for registries in HTA. The standards tool for registries in HTA will enable, among others, registry owners to consistently collect high quality registry data, and HTA agencies to use proper registry data collected by others as evidence for their assessments. The objective is to present the first draft version of the tool structure, which is going to be piloted during the forthcoming months.Methods:A review and description of the currently available first version (November 2017) sections, items and criteria for HTA studies.Results:The tool is divided in three sections; “Methodological Information”, “Essential Standards” and “Additional Requirements”. The first section enables users to analyze not only the ability of the registry to answer to research questions but also to check the registry transparency. The second section encloses the essential elements of good practice and evidence quality (therefore all of them must be met before an HTA report can use the registry data). Finally, the third section includes elements of good practice and evidence quality useful to consider in planning and evaluating registries for specific purposes. Although suggestions are defined, the third section item requirements could depend on the individual HTA agency perspectives and needs.Conclusions:There is a clear growing availability and requirement for real world data for health technology assessment. A piloted and robust registry standards tool for HTA can provide a relevant basis to improve both the evidence generation but also to make more trustful and excellent evaluations.

OP51 Thrombectomy In France: A National Use Of European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Joint Assessment

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Huguette Lhuillier-Nkandjeu ◽  
Michèle Morin-Surroca
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
List Type ◽  
European Network

INTRODUCTION:Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is used in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to occlusion of a proximal cerebral artery. Over the years endovascular techniques have been used to re-canalise blocked vessels, but are not currently reimbursed by National Health Insurance in France.The aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of MT in combination with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA), or as an alternative to it, in adults with an acute ischaemic stroke who are not eligible for thrombolysis or in whom thrombolysis has failed; to support the reimbursement decision by National Health Insurance.METHODS:Within the scope of The European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA), a rapid assessment of “Endovascular therapy using devices for acute ischaemic stroke” was jointly produced with Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) as a reviewer.RESULTS:The EUnetHTA report provided a systematic review based on eight randomized controlled trials (RCT) for effectiveness and all available published data for safety.To produce its assessment, HAS has adapted the EUnetHTA report by: 1.Updating the systematic literature review including the latest published trials2.Retaining the subgroup analysis of the five most recent trials considered more relevant in the EUnetHTA report for the assessment of effectiveness3.Analysing specifically the different endovascular interventions studied in the five RCTs4.Taking into account contributions from stakeholders.CONCLUSIONS:This horizontal collaboration among European HTA doers has facilitated and shortened the assessment of the clinical benefit of this technology, confirming the relevance of EUnetHTA cooperation.This clinical assessment of thrombectomy is to be completed by the evaluation of its organizational impact in the management of acute ischemic stroke.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document