scholarly journals Productivity Benefits of Medical Care: Evidence from US-Based Randomized Clinical Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 905-910
Author(s):  
Alice J. Chen ◽  
Dana P. Goldman
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials

scholarly journals TRUST Study: Participation in Randomized Controlled Trials and Subsequent Adherence to Visiting Medical Institutions and Taking Medications in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases. Part I. Motives for the Patients' Participation in Clinical Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 546-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yu. Martsevich ◽  
N. O. Vasyukova ◽  
N. P. Kutishenko ◽  
Yu. V. Lukina ◽  
O. I. Zvonareva
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Personal Contact ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Scientific Center ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Medical Institutions

Aim. To describe the design of TRUST study (Influence of Participation in Randomized Controlled Trials on adheRence to Medicines' Intake and regUlar viSits to the docTor) and present the first part of this study to determine the motives of patient participation in clinical trials.Material and methods. The main group of TRUST study included patients of the outpatient registrar PROFILE, which were taking part in one or more international randomized clinical trials, conducted from 2011 to 2018. The standard registration card of PROFILE register was used to assess the clinical and demographic data of patients.In 2019 full-time/telephone contact with patients was established, during which, based on the original questionnaire, the motives of the participation in trials, their attitude towards randomized controlled trials (RCT), and their adherence to monitoring in medical institutions were determined. This publication presents the results of the first part of the study.Results. 102 patients were enrolled in the study, telephone /personal contact was established for 88 patients, the life status of 9 of them by 2019 was defined as "dead", 77 were interviewed, 2 – refused to answer. Over 80% of patients completed participation in RCTs more than one year ago. 71.6% of patients participated in more than one RCT. In 60% of cases, patients claimed that this was the proposal of the doctor of the scientific center. For 79% of patients, RCTs had the opportunity to access highly skilled medical care. Only 18% of patients indicated that they received the necessary qualified medical care before entering the study. In cases where patients answered dichotomous questions (such as "yes"/"no"), the overwhelming majority of patients (74%) claimed that it was the authority of the doctor of the scientific center and the fear of losing the possibility of further observation became the main reason for participating in RCTs.Conclusion. In the first part of the TRUST study, it was revealed that in Russia the main reason of participation in RCT is the recommendation of a doctor from a specialized scientific center.

Clinical trials screening: An opportunity to increase medical care access

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A410-A410
Author(s):  
T KOVASC ◽  
R ALTMAN ◽  
R JUTABHA ◽  
G OHNING
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Care Access

L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Reza Mirhafez ◽  
Mitra Hariri
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Inflammatory Mediators ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Human Adults ◽  
Factor Α

Abstract. L-arginine is an important factor in several physiological and biochemical processes. Recently, scientists studied L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). We conducted a systematic review on randomized controlled trials assessing L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators. We searched data bases including Google scholar, ISI web of science, SCOPUS, and PubMed/Medline up to April 2019. Randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of L-arginine on inflammatory mediators in human adults were included. Our search retrieved eleven articles with 387 participants. Five articles were on patients with cancer and 6 articles were on adults without cancer. L-arginine was applied in enteral form in 5 articles and in oral form in 6 articles. Eight articles were on both genders, two articles were on women, and one article was on men. L-arginine could not reduce inflammatory mediators among patients with and without cancer except one article which indicated that taking L-arginine for 6 months decreased IL-6 among cardiopathic nondiabetic patients. Our results indicated that L-arginine might not be able to reduce selected inflammatory mediators, but for making a firm decision more studies are needed to be conducted with longer intervention duration, separately on male and female and with different doses of L-arginine.

Ongoing randomized clinical trials for the treatment of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 77-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Finazzi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Dose Oral ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

SummaryThrombotic events are a major clinical problem for patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (APA). However, current recommendations for their prevention and treatment are still based on retrospective studies. Data from large scale, prospective clinical trials are required to ultimately identify the optimal management of these patients. To date, at least four randomized studies are underway. The WAPS and PAPRE clinical trials are aimed to establish the correct duration and intensity of oral anticoagulation in APA patients with major arterial or venous thrombosis. The WARSS-APASS is a collaborative study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspirin or low-dose oral anticoagulants in preventing the recurrence of ischemic stroke. The recently announced UK Trial compares low-dose aspirin with or without low-intensity anticoagulation for the primary prevention of vascular events in APA-positive patients with SLE or adverse pregnancy history, but still thrombosis-free. It is hoped that the results of these trials will be available soon since clinicians urgently need more powerful data to treat their patients with the APA syndrome.

Clinical trials — the personal perspective of the research physician?

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-263
Author(s):  
Maria Y. Egorova ◽  
Irina A. Shuvalova ◽  
Olga I. Zvonareva ◽  
Igor D. Pimenov ◽  
Olga S. Kobyakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Personal Perspective ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
To Receive

Background. The organization of clinical trials (CTs) requires the participation and coordination of healthcare providers, patients, public and private parties. Obstacles to the participation of any of these groups pose a risk of lowering the potential for the implementation of CTs. Researchers are a key human resource in conducting of CT. Their motivation for participation can have a significant impact on the recruitment and retention of patients, on the quality of the data collected, which determines the overall outcome of the study. Aims to assess the factors affecting the inclusion of Russian physicians-researchers in CT, and to determine their role in relations with patients-participants. Materials and methods. The study was organized as a part of the Russian multicenter face-to-face study. A survey was conducted of researchers from 10 cities of Russia (20172018). The participation in the survey for doctors was anonymous and voluntary. Results. The study involved 78 respondents. Most research doctors highly value the importance of research for science (4,84 0,39), society (4,67 0,46) and slightly lower for participating patients (4,44 0,61). The expectations of medical researchers are related to improving their financial situation and attaining new experience (n = 14; 18,18%). However, the opportunity to work with new technologies of treatment and diagnosis (n = 41; 52,56%) acted as a motivating factor. According to the questionnaire, the vast majority of research doctors (n = 29; 37,18%) believe that the main reason for patients to participate in CT is to receive quality and free medical care. The most significant obstacle to the inclusion of participants in CT was the side effects of the study drug (n = 38; 48,71%). Conclusions. The potential of clinical researchers in Russia is very high. The patient-participant acts for the research doctor as the subject of the study, and not the object, so the well-being of the patient is not indifferent to the doctor. However, the features of the functioning of our health care system form the motivation of doctors-researchers (additional earnings, professional self-development) and the way they perceive the motivation of patients (CT as an opportunity to receive quality medical care).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document