scholarly journals Long-Term Efficacy Of Lower Intensity Statin Therapy In Chinese Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S26
Author(s):  
BP Yan ◽  
CK Chan ◽  
MC Wong ◽  
OT To ◽  
VW Lee
2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (7) ◽  
pp. 1628-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuma Kawaji ◽  
Hiroki Shiomi ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto ◽  
Toshihiro Tamura ◽  
Ryusuke Nishikawa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Satou ◽  
Y Matsuzawa ◽  
E Akiyama ◽  
M Konishi ◽  
T Yoshii ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Dyslipidemia, especially an increase in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been established as one of the most important risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. In contrast, some recent studies have shown that the low LDL-C level was associated with short-term poor prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease, and this is so-called “cholesterol paradox”. However, there is few data evaluating the effects on long-term outcome of “cholesterol paradox” in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine whether the low LDL-C level on admission affect long-term prognosis in patients with ACS. Methods A total of 434 ACS patients who survived to hospital discharge were enrolled in this study. All patients were statin-naïve on admission, and were received statin therapy after hospitalization. Patients were divided into the low LDL-C (≤114 mg/dl) and high LDL-C (>114 mg/dl) groups using the first tertile of the LDL-C level on admission. The primary endpoint was composite outcomes of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure and unplanned revascularization. Results During a median follow-up period of 5.5 years, primary endpoint occurred in 117 patients. Overall, event-free rates differed significantly between the low and high LDL-C groups, demonstrating the lower event-free rate in patients with the low LDL-C group (38.9% in low LDL-C group versus 20.7% in high LDL-C group, p=0.0002; Figure). Even after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and various classical risk factors, the low LDL-C group was significantly at higher risk for primary composite outcomes compared to the high LDL-C group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.65, 95%-confidence interval 1.10–2.49, p=0.02). Conclusion In patients with ACS, the low LDL-C level on admission was significantly associated with long-term worse prognosis, regardless of statin therapy at discharge. In ACS patients with low LDL-C level, it might be necessary for elucidating the residual risk for secondary adverse event to improve their prognosis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A Bavry ◽  
Girish R Mood ◽  
Dharam J Kumbhani ◽  
Peter P Borek ◽  
Arman T Askari ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Shibui ◽  
Akihiro Nakagomi ◽  
Yoshiki Kusama ◽  
Hirotsugu Atarashi ◽  
Kyoichi Mizuno

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Gabriel Córdoba-Soriano ◽  
Miguel Corbí-Pascual ◽  
Isabel López-Neyra ◽  
Javier Navarro-Cuartero ◽  
Víctor Hidalgo-Olivares ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 2465-2472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishi Puri ◽  
Steven E. Nissen ◽  
Mingyuan Shao ◽  
Christie M. Ballantyne ◽  
Philip J. Barter ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Shunji Yoshikawa ◽  
Takashi Ashikaga ◽  
Toru Miyazaki ◽  
Ken Kurihara ◽  
Kenzo Hirao

Background. The long-term safety of first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was controversial. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to establish 5-year real-world data regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of second-generation DES in Japanese patients with ACS. Methods. The Tokyo-MD PCI study is a multicenter, observational cohort study enrolling consecutive patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation. The 5-year clinical events were compared between the ACS group (n = 644) and the stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) group (n = 1255). The primary efficacy endpoint was ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), and the primary safety endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI). Results. The median follow-up duration was 5.4 years. The cumulative incidence of ischemia-driven TLR was similar between ACS and SCAD (1 year: 3.0% versus 2.7%; P=0.682, 1–5 years: 2.7% versus 2.9%; P=0.864). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death or MI within 1 year was significantly higher in ACS than in SCAD (7.4% versus 3.8%; P<0.001); however, ACS did not increase the risk of all-cause death or MI after adjusting confounders (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.260; 95% confidence interval, 0.774–2.053; P=0.352). From 1 to 5 years, the cumulative incidence of all-cause death or MI was not significantly different between ACS and SCAD (11.6% versus 11.4%; P=0.706). The cumulative incidence of very late stent thrombosis was low and similar between ACS and SCAD (0.2% versus 0.2%; P=0.942). Conclusion. This real-world registry suggested that EES has comparable long-term efficacy and safety in patients with ACS and SCAD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document