scholarly journals PCN138 HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND TOTAL DIRECT COSTS OF CARE AMONG PATIENTS WITH WALDENSTRÖM MACROGLOBULINEMIA (WM) INITIATING IBRUTINIB IN FIRST LINE VS LATER LINES

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S47
Author(s):  
R. Iyengar ◽  
M. Singhal ◽  
N. Gangan ◽  
S.J. Wu ◽  
C. Sugg ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18766-e18766
Author(s):  
Keri Yang ◽  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
Anna Ratiu ◽  
Rachel Delinger ◽  
Todd Zimmerman ◽  
...  

e18766 Background: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, incurable non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Given limited real-world data on WM treatment utilization, this study evaluates real-world treatment patterns and associated outcomes in the US commercially insured population. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the IBM MarketScan commercial claims and Medicare supplement database. Adults with ≥2 WM diagnoses and ≥1 WM treatment between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Patients included were newly diagnosed, initiating treatment, and enrolled continuously for 6 months before and ≥60 days following the index date, defined as the first date of WM treatment. Treatment regimens were categorized as: rituximab monotherapy, chemotherapy-based (alone or in combination), proteasome inhibitor-based (alone or in combination with rituximab), ibrutinib (alone or in combination with rituximab), and other regimens. Treatment patterns were evaluated by frequency and duration of treatment regimen. Adherence is measured by discontinuation and switching rates. Healthcare resource utilization examined included inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy visits. Total costs were calculated as sum of inpatient, outpatient and pharmacy costs per-patient-per-month (PPPM). Treatment regimens, costs, and hospitalizations were examined overall, and by line of therapy. Results: A total of 453 patients (mean age: 67 years, 51% male) received 1st-line therapy (mean duration: 246 days); 143 (32%) patients received 2nd-line therapy (mean duration: 231 days), and 24 (5%) received 3rd-line therapy (mean duration: 212 days). The most commonly used treatment regimens by line of therapy are shown in the treatment pattern table. Discontinuation rates were 43.3%, 50.4%, and 45.8%, and the switching rates were 25.4%, 10.5%, 20.8% during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd line of therapy, respectively. The overall hospitalization rate was 20% with an average length of stay (LOS) of 2.3 days. Approximately 17% (LOS: 1.4 days), 20% (LOS: 1.8 days), and 25% (LOS: 7.0 days) of patients had a hospitalization, during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd line of therapy, respectively. Mean total PPPM costs were $26,688 in overall population, and increased by line of therapy (1st: $18,682; 2nd: $19,171; and 3rd: $36,878). Conclusions: There remains a significant clinical and economic burden with suboptimal treatment adherence in US commercially-insured patients with WM. Future studies are needed to further understand factors associated with treatment selection. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1945-1953
Author(s):  
Jianbin Mao ◽  
Michael P. Johnson ◽  
Jeffrey T. McPheeters ◽  
Girish Prajapati ◽  
Andrew P. Beyer

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3549-3549
Author(s):  
Debra Irwin ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Kathleen Wilson ◽  
Gerard Hoehn ◽  
Erika Szabo ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine real-world differences in healthcare resource utilization of indolent non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL) patients treated with first-line ibrutinib monotherapy (IM) or first-line bendamustine + rituximab (BR) combination therapy using U.S. administrative claims data. METHODS: The MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify patients aged 18 years or older with commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance plans based on their first prescription (index date) of either IM or BR therapy between 02/01/2014 and 08/30/2017. Patients were required to be diagnosed with iNHL and be treatment naïve, as well as be continuously enrolled (CE) for 6 months prior to and at least 30 days following the index date. All-cause and iNHL-related healthcare resource utilization (e.g., inpatient admission (IP) and emergency room (ER) visits) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up period from the index date among the subset of patients with 12 months of continuous enrollment and reported per-patient per-month (PPPM). Statistical differences in the distribution of IP and ER visits between the IM versus BR therapy groups were estimated using chi-squared test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 1,544 iNHL patients were identified, with 207 patients in the IM cohort and 1,337 patients in the BR cohort. The IM cohort was significantly older (mean = 68.3 years; SD = 11.8) then the BR cohort (mean age = 62.1 years; SD = 11.1). The proportion of females was significantly (p<.05) lower in the IM cohort (36%) relative to the BR cohort (49%). The two cohorts did not differ in comorbidity as assessed by National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index score (IM=0.7 vs. BR=0.8, p=0.40). The results of the comparisons between the two groups with 12 months of follow-up (IM = 110; BR = 745) are provided in Table 1. For all-cause healthcare utilization, the proportion of IM patients experiencing at least one IP admission was significantly higher than the BR cohort as were the PPPM number of admissions. The proportion of patients with at least one ER visit was similar in the IM and BR cohorts. However, the average PPPM number of ER visits was significantly higher in the IM cohort relative to the BR cohort. A similar pattern was found for the iNHL-related healthcare utilization variables with one exception. The proportion of patients with at least one iNHL-related ER visit was significantly higher in the IM relative to the BR cohort. Conclusions: The current study examined differences in healthcare utilization among iNHL-patients treated in a front-line setting with either ibrutinib or BR combination therapy. Results indicated that not only did more ibrutinib patients experience an IP admission and ER visits, including both all-cause and iNHL-related, but they also experienced more repeat admissions and ER visits. These real-world findings highlight the importance of considering the healthcare resource utilization of iNHL patients which may be associated with their first-line therapy. Disclosures Irwin: Teva: Consultancy. Zhang:Teva: Consultancy. Wilson:Teva: Consultancy. Hoehn:Teva: Employment. Szabo:Teva: Employment. Tang:Teva: Employment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document