scholarly journals 04:21 PM Abstract No. 295 CT-guided vascular interventions using ultra-low-dose CT fluoroscopy and 4D CT DSA: a feasibility study

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. S131-S132
Author(s):  
P. Laeseke ◽  
M. Wagner ◽  
F. Lee ◽  
Y. Wu ◽  
C. Strother ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Matsuda ◽  
Tensho Yamao ◽  
Mitsuru Shakado ◽  
Yoko Shigemoto ◽  
Kyoji Okita ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundCentiloid (CL) scaling has become a standardized quantitative measure in amyloid PET because it facilitates the direct comparison of results across institutions, even when different analytical methods or tracers are used. Standard volumes of interest must be used to calculate the CL scale after the anatomic standardization of amyloid PET images using coregistered MRI; if the MRI is unavailable, the CL scale cannot be accurately calculated. This study sought to determine the substitutability of low-dose CT, which is used to correct PET attenuation in PET/CT equipment, by evaluating the measurement accuracy when low-dose CT is used as an alternative to MRI in the calculation of the CL scale. Amyloid PET images obtained using 18F-flutemetamol from 24 patients with possible or probable Alzheimer’s disease were processed to calculate the CL scale using 3D T1-weighted MRI and low-dose CT of PET/CT. CLMRI and CLCT were respectively defined as the use of MRI and CT for anatomic standardization and compared. Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180321. Registered 18 March 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031180321.ResultsA Bland–Altman plot showed that CLCT was slightly but significantly underestimated (mean ± standard deviation, −1.7 ± 2.4; p < 0.002) compared with CLMRI. The 95% limits of agreement ranged from −2.8 to −0.7. Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation of r = 0.998 between CLCT and CLMRI (p < 0.001). The linear regression equation was CLMRI = 1.027 × CLCT + 0.762. In a Bland-Altman plot, Spearman correlation analysis did not identify a significant association between the CLMRI versus CLCT difference and the CL load (ρ = −0.389, p = 0.060). This slight underestimation of CLCT may derive from slightly higher uptake when the cerebellum is used as a reference area in CT-based anatomically standardized PET images versus MRI-based images.ConclusionsLow-dose CT of PET/CT can substitute for MRI in the anatomic standardization used to calculate the CL scale from amyloid PET, although a slight underestimation occurs.


Author(s):  
Sri Hari Sundararajan ◽  
Mougnyan Cox ◽  
Neda Sedora-Roman ◽  
Srirajkumar Ranganathan ◽  
Robert Hurst ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1289-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph M. Heyer ◽  
Stefan P. Lemburg ◽  
Thomas Kagel ◽  
Klaus-Michael Mueller ◽  
Thomas G. Nuesslein ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2145-2155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Green ◽  
Edith M. Marom ◽  
Eli Konen ◽  
Nahum Kiryati ◽  
Arnaldo Mayer

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Stephenson ◽  
Ayman Mahfouz ◽  
Sridhar Rathinam ◽  
Apostolos Nakas ◽  
Amrita Bajaj

Aim. We describe our experience of a simple, safe, and reproducible technique for lung nodule marking prethoracoscopic metastasectomy. Thoracoscopic lung nodule resection reduces patient discomfort, complications, higher level of care, hospital stay, and cost; however, small deeply placed lung nodules are difficult to locate and resect thoracoscopically. Materials and Methods. We describe and review the success of our novel technique, where nodules are identified on a low dose CT and marked with methylene blue using CT fluoroscopy guidance immediately prior to surgery. Results. 30 nodules were marked with a mean size of 8 mm (4–18 mm) located at a mean depth of 17 mm, distributed through both lungs. Dye was detected at the pleural surface in 97% of the patients and at the nodule in 93%. There were no major complications. Thoracoscopic resection was possible in 90%. Conclusion. This is a simple and safe method of lung nodule marking to facilitate thoracoscopic resection in cases where this may not be technically possible due to nodule location.


2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.M. Heyer ◽  
K.M. Mueller ◽  
P. Seiffert ◽  
V. Nicolas ◽  
C.H.L. Rieger ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 101-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliodoro Faiella ◽  
Giulia Frauenfelder ◽  
Domiziana Santucci ◽  
Giacomo Luppi ◽  
Emiliano Schena ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document