Explosive activity and eruption scenarios at Somma-Vesuvius (Italy): Towards a new classification scheme

2008 ◽  
Vol 178 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cioni ◽  
A. Bertagnini ◽  
R. Santacroce ◽  
D. Andronico
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peilin Zhang

Background: There are three types of decidual vasculopathy, namely, acute atherosis, fibrinoid medial necrosis and mural arterial hyerptrophy. Persistence of vascular trophoblasts is also known to be related to maternal vascular malperfusion, but detailed study is lacking. Material and methods: A total 1017 placentas from 2021 were collected with clinical, neonatal and placental information, and routine placental pathology examination was performed. Decidual vasculopathy was classified based on the new classification scheme including atherosis of macrophage type atherosis of trophoblast type, fibrinoid medial necrosis, mural arterial hypertrophy and mixed type vasculopathy. The significance of these morphologic changes were examined based on the clinical, neonatal and placental pathology features. Results: Decidual vasculopathy is classified as classic type, mural hypertrophy and mixed type. Classic type vasculopathy is further separated as atherosis and fibrinoid medial necrosis. Atherosis is defined as atherosis of macrophage type and atherosis of trophoblast type. Each category of decidual vasculopathy was evaluated in association with maternal, neonatal and placental pathologic findings. Atherosis of macrophage type and mixed type vasculopathy showed statistically significant association with preeclampsia/pregnancy induced hypertension, low birth weight and low placental weight. Atherosis of trophoblast type was associated with lower placental weight but not with specific clinical features. There is no neonatal sex dimorphism in decidual vasculopathy. Conclusion: Atherosis of trophoblast type is a distinct pathologic feature in late pregnancy, and it is associated with lower placental weight. New classification of decidual vasculopathy helps with better stratification and categorization of placental maternal vascular abnormalities.


2021 ◽  
pp. jgs2020-212
Author(s):  
Martin R. Gillespie ◽  
A. Graham Leslie

A new scheme is introduced for classifying and naming mappable rock bodies that lack primary stratification. In recognition of their distinctive geological characteristics, these ‘nonstratiform’ bodies are defined and classified according to their 3D form, spatial distribution and genetic relationships, in two hierarchical (parent-child) chains: one for intrusions and one for tectonometamorphic units. Geologically complex units, encompassing bodies of different genetic classes, are classified in a third chain reserved specifically for ‘mixed-class’ units. The new classification scheme is offered as an alternative to existing recommendations in the International Stratigraphic Guide and North American Stratigraphic Code, in which nonstratiform bodies are recognised and defined primarily by their lithological character. BRUCS (the BGS Rock Unit Classification System) combines the three new parent-child chains for nonstratiform units with the well-established chain for stratiform units (bed-member-formation-group-supergroup) to create a flexible, practical and effective solution for classifying and naming all mappable rock bodies. The taxonomic rigour of BRUCS means the considerable capabilities of modern digital systems for managing and communicating mapping data can be exploited fully.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Murcia ◽  
Károly Németh

The study of monogenetic volcanism around Earth is rapidly growing due to the increasing recognition of monogenetic volcanic edifices in different tectonic settings. Far from the idea that this type of volcanism is both typically mafic and characteristic from intraplate environments, it occurs in a wide spectrum of composition and geological settings. This volcanism is widely known by the distinctive pyroclastic cones that represent both magmatic and phreatomagmatic explosive activity; they are known as scoria or spatter cones, tuff cones, tuff rings, maars and maar-diatremes. These cones are commonly associated with lava domes and usually accompanied by lava flows as part of their effusive eruptive phases. In spite of this, isolated effusive monogenetic emissions also appear around Earth’s surface. However, these isolated emissions are not habitually considered within the classification scheme of monogenetic volcanoes. Along with this, many of these effusive volcanoes also contrast with the belief that this volcanism is indicative of rapidly magma ascent from the asthenosphere, as many of the products are strongly evolved reflecting differentiation linked to stagnation during ascent. This has led to the understanding that the asthenosphere is not always the place that directly gives rise to the magma batches and rather, they detach from a crustal melt storage. This chapter introduces four singular effusive monogenetic volcanoes as part of the volcanic geoforms, highlights the fact that monogenetic volcanic fields can also be associated with crustal reservoirs, and outlines the processes that should occur to differentiate the magma before it is released as intermediate and acidic in composition. This chapter also provides an overview of this particular volcanism worldwide and contributes to the monogenetic comprehension for future studies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayton Dove ◽  
Rachel Nanson ◽  
Lilja Bjarnadóttir ◽  
Janine Guinan ◽  
Joana Gafeira ◽  
...  

<p>In 2016, through a collaboration between marine mapping programmes in Norway, Ireland, and the UK, we published a new classification scheme to aid the characterisation of seabed geomorphology (Dove et al., 2016). The classification scheme was developed to address shared objectives and challenges in seabed mapping, particularly to enable more consistent classification where required. The novel aspect of this framework was the effort to independently describe seabed features according to their observed physical 1-Morphology, and the more subjective interpretation of their origin and evolution (2-Geomorphology). Initial application of the approach within our own groups and externally proved promising, and through the welcome involvement of colleagues from Geoscience Australia, we continued to progress and improve the approach.</p><p>We are now within the second phase of the project, which involves the development of glossaries for both parts of the classification scheme. The glossary for part-1 Morphology was recently completed and published (Dove et al., 2020). This glossary includes a revised list of feature names, with definitions and representative diagrams for each feature. Feature definitions are in-part drawn from the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) guide for undersea feature names, which were modified and augmented with additional terms to ensure the final feature catalogue and glossary encompasses the diversity of morphologies observed at the seabed.</p><p>Part-2 Geomorphology glossary is now in development. We anticipate it to be more complicated than the Morphology glossary due to the (often) variable meaning of different terms between different fields and individual scientists. But as for Part 1, our primary objective is to produce a useful and robust framework (applicable from the coastal zone to the abyss), that minimises duplication and/or ambiguity as much as possible. The Geomorphology glossary will include example bathymetry images to add further value.</p><p>Dove, D., Bradwell, T., Carter, G., Cotterill, C., Gafeira Goncalves, J., Green, S., Krabbendam, M., Mellett, C., Stevenson, A., Stewart, H. and Westhead, K., Scott, G., Guinan, J., Judge, M., Monteys, X., Elvenes, S., Maeten, N., Dolan, M., Thorsnes, T., Bjarnadottir, L., Ottesen, D., 2016. Seabed geomorphology: a two-part classification system. British Geological Survey, Open Report OR/16/001.</p><p>Dove, D., Nanson, R., Bjarnadóttir, L.R., Guinan, J., Gafeira, J., Post, A., Dolan, M.F.J., Stewart, H., Arosio, R. and Scott, G., 2020. A two-part seabed geomorphology classification scheme:(v. 2). Part 1: morphology features glossary.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. S1-S8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack G. Caton ◽  
Gary Armitage ◽  
Tord Berglundh ◽  
Iain L.C. Chapple ◽  
Søren Jepsen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 531 ◽  
pp. A166 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Geretshauser ◽  
F. Meru ◽  
R. Speith ◽  
W. Kley

1978 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Micheau ◽  
Franco Rilke ◽  
Silvana Pilotti

A new classification scheme for malignant tumors of the nasopharynx is proposed in which the undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal types as a prominent position. This term replaces the previous obsolete term lymphoepithelioma on the basis of its clinicopathologic identity, its separation from squamous cell carcinoma, and its potential origin from anatomical areas other than the nasopharynx.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document