Comparison of Endovenous Ablation Techniques, Foam Sclerotherapy and Surgical Stripping for Great Saphenous Varicose Veins. Extended 5-year Follow-up of a RCT

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 907-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lawaetz ◽  
J. Serup ◽  
B. Lawaetz ◽  
L. Bjoern ◽  
A. Blemings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Ablation Techniques ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Endovenous Ablation

scholarly journals ClariVein® – Early results from a large single-centre series of mechanochemical endovenous ablation for varicose veins

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
TY Tang ◽  
JW Kam ◽  
ME Gaunt
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Endovenous Ablation ◽  
The Uk

Objectives This study assessed the effectiveness and patient experience of the ClariVein® endovenous occlusion catheter for varicose veins from a large single-centre series in the UK. Methods A total of 300 patients (371 legs) underwent ClariVein® treatment for their varicose veins; 184 for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, 62 bilateral GSV, 23 short saphenous vein (SSV), 6 bilateral SSV and 25 combined unilateral great saphenous vein and SSV. Patients were reviewed at an interval of two months post procedure and underwent Duplex ultrasound assessment. Postoperative complications were recorded along with patient satisfaction. Results All 393 procedures were completed successfully under local anaesthetic. Complete occlusion of the treated vein was initially achieved in all the patients, but at eight weeks’ follow-up, there was only partial obliteration in 13/393 (3.3%) veins. These were all successfully treated with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. Procedures were well tolerated with a mean pain score of 0.8 (0–10). No significant complications were reported. Conclusions ClariVein® can be used to ablate long and short saphenous varicose veins on a walk-in–walk-out basis. Bilateral procedures can be successfully performed, and these are well tolerated as can multiple veins in the same leg. Early results are promising but further evaluation and longer term follow-up are required.

A new non-tumescent endovenous ablation method for varicose vein treatment: Early results of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (VariClose®)

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alptekin Yasim ◽  
Erdinc Eroglu ◽  
Orhan Bozoglan ◽  
Bulent Mese ◽  
Mehmet Acipayam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Endovenous Ablation ◽  
Vein Diameter

Objective This report aims to present the early results of a retrospective study of the use of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (VariClose®)-based non-tumescent endovenous ablation for the treatment of patients with varicose veins. Method One hundred and eighty patients with varicose veins due to incompetent saphenous veins were treated with the VariClose® endovenous ablation method between May 2014 and November 2014. The patient sample consisted of 86 men and 94 women, with a mean age of 47.7 ± 11.7 years. The patients had a great saphenous vein diameter greater than 5.5 mm and a small saphenous vein diameter greater than 4 mm in conjunction with reflux for more than 0.5 s. Patients with varicose veins were evaluated with venous duplex examination, Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical and Pathophysiological classification (CEAP), and their Venous Clinical Severity Scores were recorded. Results The median CEAP score of patients was three, and the saphenous vein diameters were between 5.5 and 14 mm (mean of 7.7 ± 2.1 mm). A percutaneous entry was made under local anesthesia to the great saphenous vein in 169 patients and to the small saphenous vein in 11 patients. Duplex examination immediately after the procedure showed closure of the treated vein in 100% of the treated segment. No complications were observed. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 months (ranging from three to seven months). Recanalization was not observed in any of the patients during follow-up. The average Venous Clinical Severity Scores was 10.2 before the procedure and decreased to 3.9 after three months (p < 0.001). Conclusion The application of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (VariClose®) is an effective method for treating varicose veins; it yielded a high endovenous closure rate, with no need for tumescent anesthesia. However, long-term results are currently unknown.

Foam sclerotherapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen Alder ◽  
Tim Lees
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Clinical Consequence ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Endovenous Ablation

Foam sclerotherapy is a minimally invasive treatment for lower limb varicose veins. Current evidence indicates that its efficacy may not be as high as surgery or endovenous ablation. The minimally invasive nature of the treatment however means that it has a wide application, and it can be particularly useful in patients who are not suitable for other types of treatment. NICE guidelines recommend its use as a second line after endovenous ablation. Complication rates are low and most of these are of little clinical consequence.

Diagnosis and Follow-up of Varicose Veins with Duplex Ultrasound: How and Why?

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Malgor ◽  
N Labropoulos
Keyword(s):  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Work Up

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is very prevalent and causes a significant financial burden in Western societies. Accurate diagnosis is mandatory to define the anatomy and pathophysiology involved in the disease process. Duplex ultrasound (DU) is a well-established non-invasive tool used for varicose veins work-up that, most recently, has also been utilized for follow-up after endovenous procedures such as endovenous laser or radiofrequency ablation and foam sclerotherapy. Insightful information on how DU is performed during varicose veins work-up and the rationale of DU utilization for endovenous procedures are discussed.

Compression regimes after endovenous ablation for superficial venous insufficiency – A survey of members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
J El-Sheikha ◽  
S Nandhra ◽  
D Carradice ◽  
C Acey ◽  
GE Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Great Britain ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Compression Stockings ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Endovenous Laser Ablation ◽  
Endovenous Ablation ◽  
Superficial Venous Insufficiency

Introduction The optimal compression regime following ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins is not known. The aim of this study was to document current practice. Methods Postal questionnaire sent to 348 consultant members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Results Valid replies were received from 41% ( n = 141) surgeons representing at least 68 (61%) vascular units. UGFS was used by 74% surgeons, RFA by 70% and EVLA by 32%, but fewer patients received UGFS (median 30) annually, than endothermal treatment (median 50) – P = 0.019. All surgeons prescribed compression: following UGFS for median seven days (range two days to three months) and after endothermal ablation for 10 days (range two days to six weeks) – P = 0.298. Seven different combinations of bandages, pads and compression stockings were reported following UGFS and four after endothermal ablation. Some surgeons advised changing from bandages to stockings from five days (range 1–14) after UGFS. Following endothermal ablation, 71% used bandages only, followed by compression stockings after two days (range 1–14). The majority of surgeons (87%) also treated varicose tributaries: 65% used phlebectomy, the majority (65%) synchronously with endothermal ablation. Concordance of compression regimes between surgeons within vascular units was uncommon. Only seven units using UGFS and six units using endothermal ablation had consistent compression regimes. Conclusion Compression regimes after treatments for varicose veins vary significantly: more evidence is needed to guide practice.

Transient adverse events positively associated with patent foramen ovale after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Raymond-Martimbeau
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Phone Calls

Objectives To prospectively study the association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) detected by contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD) and adverse events (AEs) reported by patients after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for the treatment of varicose veins. Methods All patients reporting AEs after UGFS were studied using cTCD directed at the middle cerebral artery to determine the Spencer grading score by counting high-intensity transient signals. Agitated saline was used as the contrast medium. The Spencer grading score determined the presence or absence of PFO. All patients undergoing UGFS received follow-up phone calls within 24 hours and again two weeks after the procedure. Results Of the 3259 patients who underwent UGFS, AEs were reported by seven (0.21%) patients at their first session. These included visual disturbance, migraine and chest discomfort. Five (71.4%) of these seven patients tested positive for PFO by cTCD. The two-week follow-up confirmed no permanent symptoms. Published studies show high sensitivity and specificity for cTCD when compared with contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE). Conclusions The overall rate of AEs reported is consistent with published results. The presence of a PFO was detected in most patients reporting AEs after undergoing UGFS. While PFO screening with high sensitivity and specificity can be performed efficiently in the clinic setting, based on the literature, further investigation is warranted.

scholarly journals Foam Sclerotherapy and Laser Ablation of Varicose Veins: Newer Option in Bangladesh Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
Motiur Rahman Sarkar ◽  
Nazmul Hosain ◽  
Fazle Maruf ◽  
MA Quaiyum Chowdhury ◽  
Anisuzzaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
High Ligation ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Effective Treatment Option

Background: Varicose vein is one of the most common vascular conditions in the adult population. These are conventionally treated with surgical high ligation of Sapheno-femoral junction and stripping of Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) with multiple phlebectomy. The aim of this study was to highlight the technical considerations in performing endovenous laser ablation of varicose vein, understanding the importance and role of Duplex Machine and Tumescent anesthesia with evaluation of outcome.Methods: In this retrospective study we examined the records of 297 limbs of 220 patients operated at Vascular Care Centre at Dhaka, Bangladesh between October 2013 and October 2015. Among them 1 year follow up was performed in 118 patients. Patients were contacted through telephone calls and mobile SMSs with requests for follow up.Results: Vast majority of the patients had a smooth recovery. Significant pain was present in only 10% of patients for 1week after laser therapy and 3% of patients noted bruising in thigh for 2 weeks. Among the 118 patients who reported for follow up at 12 months, 113 (96%) showed effective persistent occlusion of GSV.Conclusion: EVLA of varicose vein is gaining popularity day by day in Bangladesh. It has become established as a safe and effective treatment option for varicosities caused by GSV incompetence. Foam sclerotherapy with Sodium tetradecyl sulphate replacing the multiple phlebectomy may be a suitable adjunct. Quick return to normal activities, fewer wound infections, less leg pain and leg bruising are strongly associated with these endovenous techniques compared with Saphenous vein stripping.Cardiovasc. j. 2018; 10(2): 140-144

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document