Foam sclerotherapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen Alder ◽  
Tim Lees
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Clinical Consequence ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Endovenous Ablation

Foam sclerotherapy is a minimally invasive treatment for lower limb varicose veins. Current evidence indicates that its efficacy may not be as high as surgery or endovenous ablation. The minimally invasive nature of the treatment however means that it has a wide application, and it can be particularly useful in patients who are not suitable for other types of treatment. NICE guidelines recommend its use as a second line after endovenous ablation. Complication rates are low and most of these are of little clinical consequence.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for severe chronic venous insufficiency

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 511-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Camargo Gonçalves de-Abreu ◽  
Otacílio de Camargo Júnior ◽  
Márcia Fayad Marcondes de-Abreu ◽  
José Luís Braga de-Aquino
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Chronic Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Venous Hypertension ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
New Techniques

ABSTRACT Chronic venous insufficiency is characterized by cutaneous alterations caused by venous hypertension; in severe forms, it progresses to lower limb ulcers. Lower limb varicose veins are the main cause of chronic venous insufficiency, and the classic treatment includes surgery and compressive therapy. Minimally invasive alternative treatments for varicose veins include new techniques such as venous thermal ablation using laser or radiofrequency. The use of different methods depends on clinical and anatomical factors. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is the venous injection of sclerosing foam controlled by Doppler ultrasound. Sclerotherapy is very useful to treat varicose veins, and probably, is cheaper than other methods. However, until the present, it is the less studied method.

scholarly journals The Treatment of Varicose Veins

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Subramonia ◽  
TA Lees
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
Conventional Teaching ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Recent Addition ◽  
Single Method ◽  
New Treatments

INTRODUCTION Over the past few years, there has been a move to less invasive endoluminal methods in the treatment of lower limb varicose veins combined with a renewed interest in sclerotherapy, with the recent addition of foam sclerotherapy. The development of these new techniques has led many to question some of the more conventional teaching on the treatment of varicose veins. This review examines these new treatments for lower limb varicose veins and the current evidence for their use. MATERIALS AND METHODS An extensive search of available electronic and paper-based databases was performed to identify studies relevant to the treatment of varicose veins with particular emphasis on those published within the last 10 years. These were analysed by both reviewers independently. RESULTS There is no single method of treatment appropriate for all cases. Conventional surgery is safe and effective and is still widely practised. Whilst the new treatments may be popular with both surgeons and patients, it is important that they are carefully evaluated not only for their clinical benefits and complications when compared to existing treatments but also for their cost prior to their wider acceptance into clinical practice.

Echo-guided foam sclerotherapy treatment of venous malformation involving the sciatic nerve

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gianesini ◽  
E Menegatti ◽  
G Tacconi ◽  
F Scognamillo ◽  
A Liboni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sciatic Nerve ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Venous Malformation ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Entire Cohort

Primary sciatic nerve varices (SNV) lie within the sciatic nerve possibly causing chronic venous disease and sciatic pain as well. We report a series of 12 consecutive patients affected by symptomatic SNV. All of them were treated by echo-guided Tessari foam sclerotherapy (EGFSCL). Mean follow up lasted two years. Reflux through the sciatic veins, as the connected superficial varicose veins, disappeared in the entire cohort and only minor complications have emerged. EGFSCL seems to be both safe and effective, so representing a reliable and minimally invasive treatment.

Detection of residual varicose veins with near infrared light in the early period after varicose surgery and near infrared light assisted sclerotherapy

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110514
Author(s):  
Nail Kahraman ◽  
Gündüz Yümün ◽  
Deniz Demir ◽  
Kadir K Özsin ◽  
Sadık A Sünbül ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Infrared Light ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Near Infrared Light ◽  
Nir Light ◽  
Male Patients

Objectives Varicose veins that cannot be seen with the naked eye can be easily detected with Near Infrared (NIR) light. With a minimally invasive procedure performed with NIR light guided, the need for reoperation is reduced, while optimal treatment of venous insufficiency and symptoms is provided. In this study, the detection of residual varicose veins after varicose vein surgery using NIR light and the results of treatment of sclerotherapy were investigated. Methods In this retrospective study, treatment and clinical outcomes of patients’ who underwent NIR light-guided foam sclerotherapy for Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) (C1, C2) stage residual varicose veins after surgical varicose treatment between 2014 and 2017 were examined. Data of patients who underwent foam sclerotherapy with NIR light were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 151 patients and 171 lower extremity varicose veins were treated with surgery. 55 (35.7%) of the patients were male, and 96 (62.3%) were female. Their age ranges from 20 to 64, with an average age of 45.38. 4 (2.6%) of the patients had phlebectomy. 137 of patients (90.7%) had ligation of perforated veins, phlebectomy, and great saphenous vein (GSV) stripping, 10 of patients (6.6%) had GSV stripping, perforating vein ligation, phlebectomy, and small saphenous vein (SSV) surgery. No residual leakage was observed in the controls of GSV, SSV, and perforating veins by duplex ultrasonography (DUS). In the first month after varicose surgery, an average of 1.64 ± 1.05 sessions of sclerotherapy was applied to patients with CEAP C1, C2 stage residual varicose veins. 70 patients had one session of sclerotherapy, 37 patients had two sessions of sclerotherapy, 20 patients had three sessions of sclerotherapy, and 11 patients had four sessions of sclerotherapy administrated. The need for complementary therapy was required for all female patients; 13 of the male patients did not require complementary sclerotherapy. While single-session sclerotherapy was applied to most male patients (32 (58.18%), 10 (18.18%) patients received two sclerotherapy sessions. After completing sclerotherapy, 7 (4.63%) patients had superficial venous thrombosis, and 13 (8.60%) patients had hyperpigmentation. Conclusion Surgical treatment is a safe and effective technique in venous insufficiency. Nevertheless, residual varicose veins may remain, and these can be detected noninvasively with NIR light. Foam sclerotherapy with NIR light is a minimally invasive and safe treatment method for small residual varicose veins after the operation. We think that sclerotherapy with NIR light as a complementary treatment is a practical, reliable, and demanding treatment for clinical improvement, especially in female patients.

European College of Phlebology guideline for truncal ablation

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kürşat Bozkurt ◽  
Martin Lawaetz ◽  
Gudmundur Danielsson ◽  
Andreas M Lazaris ◽  
Milos Pavlovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Grade Scale ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Endovenous Ablation

Background The purpose of the guideline was to achieve consensus in the care and treatment of patients with chronic venous disease, based on current evidence. Method A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane library up until 1 February 2019. Additional relevant literature were added through checking of references. Level of evidence was graded through the GRADE scale and recommendations were concluded. Results For the treatment of great and small saphenous vein reflux, endovenous ablation with laser or radiofrequency was recommended in preference to surgery or foam sclerotherapy. If tributaries are to be treated it should be done in the same procedure. Treatment with mecanicochemical ablation and glue can be used but we still need long term follow up results. Conclusion For the treatment of truncal varicosities, endovenous ablation with laser or radiofrequency combined with phlebectomies is recommended before surgery or foam.

Can foam sclerotherapy be used to safely treat bilateral varicose veins?

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Bhogal ◽  
C E Moffat ◽  
P Coney ◽  
I K Nyamekye
Keyword(s):  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Visual Disturbance ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Treatment Episode ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Systemic Complications ◽  
Complete Occlusion ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective We assessed the use of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) to treat bilateral varicose veins either as synchronous or interval procedures. We specifically assessed total foam volume usage and its influence on early outcome and complications. Methods We reviewed our prospectively compiled computerised database of patients with bilateral varicose veins who have undergone UGFS. Duplex findings, foam volumes used and clinical outcome were assessed. Results One hundred and twelve patients had undergone UGFS for bilateral varicose veins. Sixty-one had bilateral UGFS (122 legs) and 51 had interval UGFS (102 legs). Seventy-eight percent bilateral and 60% interval procedures were for single trunk disease. Median foam volumes per treatment episode were: 17.5 mls bilateral, and 10 mls interval FS. At two weeks 81% of legs had complete occlusion after bilateral UGFS compared to 70% after interval UGFS. One patient in the bilateral UGFS developed transient visual disturbance. There was no systemic complications in the interval UGFS. Conclusions Bilateral foam sclerotherapy treatment did not adversly affect vein occlusion rates and there was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups. Bilateral UGFS can be safely performed in selected patient presenting with bilateral varicose veins.

scholarly journals ClariVein® – Early results from a large single-centre series of mechanochemical endovenous ablation for varicose veins

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
TY Tang ◽  
JW Kam ◽  
ME Gaunt
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Endovenous Ablation ◽  
The Uk

Objectives This study assessed the effectiveness and patient experience of the ClariVein® endovenous occlusion catheter for varicose veins from a large single-centre series in the UK. Methods A total of 300 patients (371 legs) underwent ClariVein® treatment for their varicose veins; 184 for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, 62 bilateral GSV, 23 short saphenous vein (SSV), 6 bilateral SSV and 25 combined unilateral great saphenous vein and SSV. Patients were reviewed at an interval of two months post procedure and underwent Duplex ultrasound assessment. Postoperative complications were recorded along with patient satisfaction. Results All 393 procedures were completed successfully under local anaesthetic. Complete occlusion of the treated vein was initially achieved in all the patients, but at eight weeks’ follow-up, there was only partial obliteration in 13/393 (3.3%) veins. These were all successfully treated with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. Procedures were well tolerated with a mean pain score of 0.8 (0–10). No significant complications were reported. Conclusions ClariVein® can be used to ablate long and short saphenous varicose veins on a walk-in–walk-out basis. Bilateral procedures can be successfully performed, and these are well tolerated as can multiple veins in the same leg. Early results are promising but further evaluation and longer term follow-up are required.

Vascular surgery

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Agarwal ◽  
Neil Borley ◽  
Greg McLatchie
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Abdominal Aortic

This chapter covers vascular operations. Treatments described for varicose veins are high tie and multiple avulsions, radio-frequency ablation, and foam sclerotherapy. Repair of elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and endovascular repair are described. Operations like aortobifemoral bypass, femoral popliteal above- and below-knee bypass graft, and femoro-distal bypass are included. Urgent operations like femoral and brachial embolectomy, lower limb fasciotomy are also described. In addition, above- and below-knee amputations and vascular access are included.

CHIVA, ASVAL and related techniques – Concepts and evidence

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 42-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Onida ◽  
Alun H Davies
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Chronic Venous Disease ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Venous Circulation ◽  
Underlying Pathophysiology

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a highly prevalent condition with significant effects on patients’ quality of life. Despite this, the underlying pathophysiology of venous disease still remains unclear. Two schools of thought exist, explaining the development and propagation of venous disease as an “ascending” and “descending” process, respectively. The descending theory, stating that CVD is secondary to proximal disease (e.g. saphenofemoral/saphenous incompetence), is the most widely accepted when planning treatment aiming to remove or destroy the junction or truncal veins. The ascending theory, describing the disease process as developing in the lower most part of the leg and propagating cranially, aims to re-route the venous circulation via minimally invasive interventions. Classically, superficial venous insufficiency has been treated with the removal of the incompetent trunk, via open surgery or, increasingly, with endovenous interventions. Minimally invasive treatment modalities aiming to preserve the saphenous trunk, such as CHIVA and ASVAL, may also play an important role in the treatment of the patient with varicose veins.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document