BDS-2 and BDS-3 combined precise orbit determination with hybrid ambiguity resolution

Measurement ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 110593
Author(s):  
Yaquan Peng ◽  
Xiaolei Dai ◽  
Yidong Lou ◽  
Xiaopeng Gong ◽  
Fu Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit

Assessment of single-difference and track-to-track ambiguity resolution in LEO precise orbit determination

GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingyu Zhou ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Wenlan Fan ◽  
Xiaohui Zhou ◽  
Qusen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Single Difference

scholarly journals Real-Time Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination for LEO Satellites Using Zero-Differenced Ambiguity Resolution

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 2815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxing Li ◽  
Jiaqi Wu ◽  
Keke Zhang ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Yun Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
The Real ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Ambiguity Fixing ◽  
Real Time Kinematic ◽  
Leo Satellites ◽  
Fixed Solution

The rapid growing number of earth observation missions and commercial low-earth-orbit (LEO) constellation plans have provided a strong motivation to get accurate LEO satellite position and velocity information in real time. This paper is devoted to improve the real-time kinematic LEO orbits through fixing the zero-differenced (ZD) ambiguities of onboard Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) phase observations. In the proposed method, the real-time uncalibrated phase delays (UPDs) are estimated epoch-by-epoch via a global-distributed network to support the ZD ambiguity resolution (AR) for LEO satellites. By separating the UPDs, the ambiguities of onboard ZD GPS phase measurements recover their integer nature. Then, wide-lane (WL) and narrow-lane (NL) AR are performed epoch-by-epoch and the real-time ambiguity–fixed orbits are thus obtained. To validate the proposed method, a real-time kinematic precise orbit determination (POD), for both Sentinel-3A and Swarm-A satellites, was carried out with ambiguity–fixed and ambiguity–float solutions, respectively. The ambiguity fixing results indicate that, for both Sentinel-3A and Swarm-A, over 90% ZD ambiguities could be properly fixed with the time to first fix (TTFF) around 25–30 min. For the assessment of LEO orbits, the differences with post-processed reduced dynamic orbits and satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals are investigated. Compared with the ambiguity–float solution, the 3D orbit difference root mean square (RMS) values reduce from 7.15 to 5.23 cm for Sentinel-3A, and from 5.29 to 4.01 cm for Swarm-A with the help of ZD AR. The SLR residuals also show notable improvements for an ambiguity–fixed solution; the standard deviation values of Sentinel-3A and Swarm-A are 4.01 and 2.78 cm, with improvements of over 20% compared with the ambiguity–float solution. In addition, the phase residuals of ambiguity–fixed solution are 0.5–1.0 mm larger than those of the ambiguity–float solution; the possible reason is that the ambiguity fixing separate integer ambiguities from unmodeled errors used to be absorbed in float ambiguities.

Combined precise orbit determination of GPS and GLONASS with ambiguity resolution

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (12) ◽  
pp. 2585-2603
Author(s):  
Xiangdong An ◽  
Xiaolin Meng ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Weiping Jiang ◽  
Ruijie Xi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit

Improving integer ambiguity resolution for GLONASS precise orbit determination

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 715-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Maorong Ge ◽  
Chuang Shi ◽  
Yidong Lou ◽  
Jens Wickert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Integer Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Integer Ambiguity ◽  
Precise Orbit

scholarly journals Real-Time Precise Orbit Determination for LEO between Kinematic and Reduced-Dynamic with Ambiguity Resolution

Aerospace ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Zhiyu Wang ◽  
Zishen Li ◽  
Ningbo Wang ◽  
Mainul Hoque ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Fixed Ratio ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Low Earth Orbit ◽  
Integer Ambiguity ◽  
The Real ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
Reduced Dynamic

The real-time integer-ambiguity resolution of the carrier-phase observation is one of the most effective approaches to enhance the accuracy of real-time precise point positioning (PPP), kinematic precise orbit determination (KPOD), and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination (RPOD) for low earth orbit (LEO) satellites. In this study, the integer phase clock (IPC) and wide-lane satellite bias (WSB) products from CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales) are used to fix ambiguity in real time. Meanwhile, the three models of real-time PPP, KPOD, and RPOD are applied to validate the contribution of ambiguity resolution. Experimental results show that (1) the average positioning accuracy of IGS stations for ambiguity-fixed solutions is improved from about 7.14 to 5.91 cm, with an improvement of around 17% compared to the real-time float PPP solutions, with enhancement in the east-west direction particularly significant, with an improvement of about 29%; (2) the average accuracy of the estimated LEO orbit with ambiguity-fixed solutions in the real-time KPOD and RPOD mode is improved by about 16% and 10%, respectively, with respect to the corresponding mode with the ambiguity-float solutions; (3) the performance of real-time LEO RPOD is better than that of the corresponding KPOD, regardless of fixed- or float-ambiguity solutions. Moreover, the average ambiguity-fixed ratio can reach more than 90% in real-time PPP, KPOD, and RPOD.

scholarly journals Kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 47-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Švehla ◽  
M. Rothacher
Keyword(s):  
Ambiguity Resolution ◽  
Orbit Determination ◽  
Precise Orbit Determination ◽  
Double Difference ◽  
Phase Measurements ◽  
Precise Orbit ◽  
First Results ◽  
Orbit Dynamic ◽  
Reduced Dynamic

Abstract. Various methods for kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination (POD) of Low Earth Orbiters (LEO) were developed based on zero- and double-differencing of GPS carrier-phase measurements with and without ambiguity resolution. In this paper we present the following approaches in LEO precise orbit determination: – zero-difference kinematic POD, – zero-difference dynamic POD, – double-difference kinematic POD with and without ambiguity resolution, – double-difference dynamic POD with and without ambiguity resolution, – combined GPS/SLR reduced-dynamic POD. All developed POD approaches except the combination of GPS/SLR were tested using real CHAMP data (May 20-30, 2001) and independently validated with Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) data over the same 11 days. With SLR measurements, additional combinations are possible and in that case one can speak of combined kinematic or combined reduced-dynamic POD. First results of such a combined GPS/SLR POD will be presented, too. This paper shows what LEO orbit accuracy may be achieved with GPS using different strategies including zerodifference and double-difference approaches. Kinematic versus dynamic orbit determination is presently an interesting issue that will also be discussed in this article.Key words. POD, kinematic orbit, dynamic orbit, LEO, CHAMP, ambiguity resolution, GPS, SLR

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document