Erratum to “Low-cycle fatigue behavior of Al-based composites containing in situ TiB2, Al2O3 and Al3Ti reinforcements” [Mater. Sci. Eng. A 358 (1–2) (2003) 99–106]

2004 ◽  
Vol 366 (2) ◽  
pp. 426 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Tjong ◽  
G.S. Wang ◽  
Y.W. Mai
Keyword(s):  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Cycle Fatigue

Effect of Surface Recrystallization on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Directionally Solidified Superalloy DZ4 by In Situ SEM Studies

2012 ◽  
Vol 706-709 ◽  
pp. 2456-2461
Author(s):  
Xian Feng Ma ◽  
Hui Ji Shi
Keyword(s):  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Shot Peening ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Directionally Solidified ◽  
Annealing Heat Treatment ◽  
Crack Growth Rates

The effect of recrystallization on the low cycle fatigue life of DZ4 directionally solidified superalloy was investigated for specimens with three different recrystallized layers, which were generated by shot peening (0.1MPa, 0.3MPa and 0.5MPa respectively) and a subsequent annealing heat treatment. The fatigue life showed a decrease for recrystallized specimens with shot-peening of 0.1 MPa and 0.3 MPa, and an unusual increase for that of 0.5MPa, in comparison with the original DZ4 specimen. In-situ SEM observations were performed on the short crack growth behaviors for both original and recrystallized specimens, which revealed the fracture mechanism and the interaction with microstructure. Quantitative analysis of fatigue crack growth rates rationalized the influence of recrystallization on the low-cycle fatigue life of DZ4.

Effects of Surface Finish and Loading Conditions on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel in PWR Environment for Various Strain Amplitude Levels

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Alain Le Duff ◽  
Andre´ Lefranc¸ois ◽  
Jean Philippe Vernot
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Strain Amplitude ◽  
Surface Finish ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Complex Loading ◽  
Loading Conditions ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Cycle Fatigue

In February/March 2007, The NRC issued Regulatory Guide “RG1.207” and Argonne National Laboratory issued NUREG/CR-6909 that is now applicable in the US for evaluations of PWR environmental effects in fatigue analyses of new reactor components. In order to assess the conservativeness of the application of this NUREG report, Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) tests were performed by AREVA NP on austenitic stainless steel specimens in a PWR environment. The selected material exhibits in air environment a fatigue behavior consistent with the ANL reference “air” mean curve, as published in NUREG/CR-6909. LCF tests in a PWR environment were performed at various strain amplitude levels (± 0.6% or ± 0.3%) for two loading conditions corresponding to a simple or to a complex strain rate history. The simple loading condition is a fully reverse triangle signal (for comparison purposes with tests performed by other laboratories with the same loading conditions) and the complex signal simulates the strain variation for an actual typical PWR thermal transient. In addition, two various surface finish conditions were tested: polished and ground. This paper presents the comparisons of penalty factors, as observed experimentally, with penalty factors evaluated using ANL formulations (considering the strain integral method for complex loading), and on the other, the comparison of the actual fatigue life of the specimen with the fatigue life predicted through the NUREG report application. For the two strain amplitudes of ± 0.6% and ± 0.3%, LCF tests results obtained on austenitic stainless steel specimens in PWR environment with triangle waveforms at constant low strain rates give “Fen” penalty factors close to those estimated using the ANL formulation (NUREG/6909). However, for the lower strain amplitude level and a triangle loading signal, the ANL formulation is pessimistic compared to the AREVA NP test results obtained for polished specimens. Finally, it was observed that constant amplitude LCF test results obtained on ground specimens under complex loading simulating an actual sequence of a cold and hot thermal shock exhibits lower combined environmental and surface finish effects when compared to the penalty factors estimated on the basis of the ANL formulations. It appears that the application of the NUREG/CR-6909 in conjunction with the Fen model proposed by ANL for austenitic stainless steel provides excessive margins, whereas the current ASME approach seems sufficient to cover significant environmental effects for representative loadings and surface finish conditions of reactor components.

Component Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior Based on Standard Calculation Procedure and Non-Linear FEA

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Rudolph ◽  
Adrian Willuweit ◽  
Steffen Bergholz ◽  
Christian Philippek ◽  
Jevgenij Kobzarev
Keyword(s):  
Power Plants ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Fatigue Behavior ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Constitutive Material Model ◽  
Standard Design ◽  
Creep Fatigue

Components of conventional power plants are subject to potential damage mechanisms such as creep, fatigue and their combination. These mechanisms have to be considered in the mechanical design process. Against this general background — as an example — the paper focusses on the low cycle fatigue behavior of a main steam shut off valve. The first design check based on standard design rules and linear Finite Element Analysis (FEA) identifies fatigue sensitive locations and potentially high fatigue usage. This will often occur in the context of flexible operational modes of combined cycle power plants which are a characteristic of the current demands of energy supply. In such a case a margin analysis constitutes a logical second step. It may comprise the identification of a more realistic description of the real operational loads and load-time histories and a refinement of the (creep-) fatigue assessment methods. This constitutes the basis of an advanced component design and assessment. In this work, nonlinear FEA is applied based on a nonlinear kinematic constitutive material model, in order to simulate the thermo-mechanical behavior of the high-Cr steel component mentioned above. The required material parameters are identified based on data of the accessible reference literature and data from an own test series. The accompanying testing campaign was successfully concluded by a series of uniaxial thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) tests simulating the most critical load case of the component. This detailed and hybrid approach proved to be appropriate for ensuring the required lifetime period of the component.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document