Compressive behavior of a rolled open-cell aluminum foam

2018 ◽  
Vol 715 ◽  
pp. 281-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasanth Chakravarthy Shunmugasamy ◽  
Bilal Mansoor
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 2633366X2092367
Author(s):  
Chengbing Li ◽  
Chunxing Li ◽  
Yazhou Wang

In practical engineering applications, while the open-cell aluminum foam as crash absorber is filled to the hollow structures, its deformation occurs under constrained stress boundaries. The experimental work was conducted to examine the effect of radial constraints on the mechanical behavior of the open-cell aluminum foam under quasi-static and dynamic compression. Results show that the radial constraints induce significant strain hardening of the open-cell aluminum foam. The open-cell aluminum foams tested with and without radial constraints show a clear strain rate sensitivity. The densification of the foam occurs earlier (showing lower densification strain) under radial constraints. The radial constraints enhance the energy absorbed per unit volume of the open-cell aluminum foam.


Author(s):  
Nihad Dukhan ◽  
Angel Alvarez

Wind-tunnel pressure drop measurements for airflow through two samples of forty-pore-per-inch commercially available open-cell aluminum foam were undertaken. Each sample’s cross-sectional area perpendicular to the flow direction measured 10.16 cm by 24.13 cm. The thickness in the flow direction was 10.16 cm for one sample and 5.08 cm for the other. The flow rate ranged from 0.016 to 0.101 m3/s for the thick sample and from 0.025 to 0.134 m3/s for the other. The data were all in the fully turbulent regime. The pressure drop for both samples increased with increasing flow rate and followed a quadratic behavior. The permeability and the inertia coefficient showed some scatter with average values of 4.6 × 10−8 m2 and 2.9 × 10−8 m2, and 0.086 and 0.066 for the thick and the thin samples, respectively. The friction factor decayed with the Reynolds number and was weakly dependent on the Reynolds number for Reynolds number greater than 35.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 1587-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-Zheng Yue ◽  
Keiji Matsuo ◽  
Koichi Kitazono

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven De Schampheleire ◽  
Peter De Jaeger ◽  
Kathleen De Kerpel ◽  
Bernd Ameel ◽  
Henk Huisseune ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paiboon Wattanapornphan ◽  
Chakkrist Phongphisutthinan ◽  
Tetsuo Suga ◽  
Masami Mizutani ◽  
Seiji Katayama

2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusheng Han ◽  
Hefa Cheng ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Zhibin Li

Materials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanoil Linul ◽  
Nima Movahedi ◽  
Liviu Marsavina

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document