Wired to punish? Electroencephalographic study of the resting-state neuronal oscillations underlying third-party punishment

Author(s):  
O. Zinchenko ◽  
V. Nikulin ◽  
V. Klucharev
2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 3517-3528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Lei ◽  
Yulin Wang ◽  
Hong Yuan ◽  
Dante Mantini

NeuroImage ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Michels ◽  
Muthuraman Muthuraman ◽  
Rafael Lüchinger ◽  
Ernst Martin ◽  
Abdul Rauf Anwar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 234 (13) ◽  
pp. 1957-1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin von Rotz ◽  
Michael Kometer ◽  
Dario Dornbierer ◽  
Jürg Gertsch ◽  
M. Salomé Gachet ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (37) ◽  
pp. 13128-13136 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. A. Smit ◽  
E. J. C. de Geus ◽  
M. E. van de Nieuwenhuijzen ◽  
C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt ◽  
G. C. M. van Baal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungkean Kim ◽  
Yong-Wook Kim ◽  
Miseon Shim ◽  
Min Jin Jin ◽  
Chang-Hwan Im ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tomasello

Abstract My response to the commentaries focuses on four issues: (1) the diversity both within and between cultures of the many different faces of obligation; (2) the possible evolutionary roots of the sense of obligation, including possible sources that I did not consider; (3) the possible ontogenetic roots of the sense of obligation, including especially children's understanding of groups from a third-party perspective (rather than through participation, as in my account); and (4) the relation between philosophical accounts of normative phenomena in general – which are pitched as not totally empirical – and empirical accounts such as my own. I have tried to distinguish comments that argue for extensions of the theory from those that represent genuine disagreement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document