scholarly journals Effect of milk composition on sensory attributes and instrumental properties of Indian Cottage Cheese (chhana)

NFS Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purba Chakraborty ◽  
U.S. Shivhare ◽  
Santanu Basu
1955 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Henson ◽  
T. B. Miller

1. The problem of unsatisfactory curd formation in cottage-cheese manufacture has been studied in relation to milk composition.2. Addition of calcium chloride to the milk did not produce significant improvement.3. There was a distinct breed difference in the curd formation; Jersey milk produced satisfactory curd whilst Friesian milk invariably produced unsatisfactory curd.4. Dilution of Jersey milk to the same level of precipitable casein as Friesian milk resulted in unsatisfactory curd.5. The presence of 10 % Friesian milk in Jersey milk rendered the latter unsatisfactory.6. The Walker formol titration for determination of casein gave significantly high values with Friesian milk. This is attributed to the different distribution of nitrogen in Friesian milk.


Author(s):  
M.I. GonzÁlez-Martín ◽  
I. Revilla ◽  
P. Severiano-Pérez ◽  
A.M. Vivar-Quintana ◽  
J.M. HernÁndez-Hierro ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 704 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Wiley ◽  
J. O. Reagan ◽  
J. A. Carpenter ◽  
C. E. Davis ◽  
J. A. Christian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Pellegrino ◽  
Curtis Luckett

Texture is a prominent feature in foods and consequently can be the reason a food is accepted or rejected. However, other sensory attributes, such as flavor/taste, aroma, sound and appearance may also lead to the rejection of food and motivations other than unpleasantness exist in unacceptance. To date, these motivations for food rejection have been studied in isolation and their relationships with psychological factors have not been tested. This study measured reasons people reject a food and probed into the specifics of texture rejection. A large U.S. sample (N=473) was asked to rate their motivations for rejecting a food, list foods that were disliked due to unpleasant sensory attributes, specify the unpleasant sensory attribute(s), and complete an assessment of general touch sensitivity. Results showed 94% of individuals reject a food due to its texture, a rate comparable to flavor-based rejection. Looking at the number of foods being rejected, flavor was the most common food attribute, followed by texture and then aroma. From a linguistic standpoint, aversive textures encompass a large vocabulary, larger than liked textures, and the same food may be rejected due to a single or combination of texture terms. Viscosity (e.g. slimy) and hardness (e.g. mushy) are the most common aversive texture types, but through cluster analysis subsets of individuals were identified that are more aversive to other textures. This study emphasizes the role of aversive textures in food rejection and provides many avenues for future investigations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document