Temporal dynamics of Arc gene induction in hippocampus: Relationship to context memory formation

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Pevzner ◽  
Teiko Miyashita ◽  
Aaron J. Schiffman ◽  
John F. Guzowski
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avery S. Gholston ◽  
Kimberly Sarah Chiew

Reward benefits to memory formation have been robustly linked to dopaminergic activity. Despite established characterization of dopaminergic mechanisms as operating at multiple timescales, potentially supporting distinct functional outcomes, the temporal dynamics by which reward might modulate memory encoding are just beginning to be investigated. In the present study, we leveraged a mixed block/event experimental design to disentangle transient and sustained reward influences on task engagement and subsequent recognition memory in an adapted monetary-incentive encoding (MIE) paradigm. Across three behavioral experiments, transient and sustained reward modulation of item and context memory was probed, at both 24-hour and ~10-minute retention intervals, to investigate the importance of overnight consolidation. In general, we observed that transient reward was associated with enhanced item memory encoding, while sustained reward modulated task engagement at encoding (specifically, increasing response speed) but did not confer a benefit to subsequent memory performance. Notably, reward benefits to item memory performance were somewhat inconsistent across the three experiments, and in contrast to predictions, we did not observe reward modulation of context memory performance or amplification of reward effects by overnight consolidation. Taken together, the observed pattern of behavior suggests potentially distinct roles for transient and sustained reward in memory encoding and cognitive performance and suggests that further investigation of the temporal dynamics of dopaminergic contributions to memory formation will advance understanding of motivated memory.


eNeuro ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. ENEURO.0387-20.2020
Author(s):  
Soroush Mirjalili ◽  
Patrick Powell ◽  
Jonathan Strunk ◽  
Taylor James ◽  
Audrey Duarte

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Im Choi ◽  
Hee Kyung Lee ◽  
Hae Su Kim ◽  
So Young Park ◽  
Kyoung-hye Yoon ◽  
...  

Animals sense an enormous number of cues in their environments, and, over time, can form memories and associations to some of these. The nervous system remarkably maintains the specificity of memory to each of the cues. Here we asked whether the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans adjusts the temporal dynamics of odor memory formation depending on the specific odor sensed. C. elegans senses a multitude of odors, and memory formation to some of these odors requires activity of the cGMP-dependent protein kinase EGL-4 in the AWC sensory neuron. We identified a panel of 17 attractive odors, some of which have not been tested before, and determined that the majority of these odors require the AWC primary sensory neuron for sensation. We then devised a novel assay to assess odor behavior over time for a single population of animals. We used this assay to evaluate the temporal dynamics of memory formation to 13 odors and find that memory formation occurs early in some odors and later in others. We then examined EGL-4 localization in early-trending and late-trending odors over time and found that the timing of memory formation correlated with the timing of nuclear accumulation of EGL-4 in the AWC neuron. We demonstrate that odor memory formation in C. elegans can be used as a model to study the timing of memory formation to different sensory cues.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Shimane ◽  
Takumi Tanaka ◽  
Katsumi Watanabe ◽  
Kanji Tanaka

Actions enhance incidental memory for items that appear in close succession. However, the role of action processes, such as preparation and execution, on the processes underlying such an interaction is unclear. Here, we examined the temporal dynamics of action-induced memory enhancement. In two experiments, participants performed Go/No-Go tasks while viewing task-unrelated pictures before or after their Go motor responses. Compared to items presented at similar time points in the No-Go trials, items presented after, not before, action execution were consistently better remembered in the subsequent memory tests. Our findings highlight the role of action execution and post-action processes, such as action-effect monitoring, in memory formation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 386-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Heroux ◽  
Patrese A. Robinson-Drummer ◽  
Malak Kawan ◽  
Jeffrey B. Rosen ◽  
Mark E. Stanton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document