Ensemble data assimilation for ocean biogeochemical state and parameter estimation at different sites

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 65-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Gharamti ◽  
J. Tjiputra ◽  
I. Bethke ◽  
A. Samuelsen ◽  
I. Skjelvan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Estimation ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data

scholarly journals Enhanced flood forecasting through ensemble data assimilation and joint state-parameter estimation

2019 ◽  
Vol 577 ◽  
pp. 123924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo G. Ziliani ◽  
Rabih Ghostine ◽  
Boujemaa Ait-El-Fquih ◽  
Matthew F. McCabe ◽  
Ibrahim Hoteit
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Estimation ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
State Parameter ◽  
Flood Forecasting ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data ◽  
Joint State

scholarly journals Soil model parameter estimation with ensemble data assimilation

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Orescanin ◽  
Borivoj Rajkovic ◽  
Milija Zupanski ◽  
Dusanka Zupanski
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Estimation ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Model Parameter ◽  
Model Parameter Estimation ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data ◽  
Soil Model

Parameter estimation for ocean biogeochemical component in a global model using Ensemble Kalman Filter: a twin experiment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarkeshwar Singh ◽  
Francois Counillon ◽  
Jerry F. Tjiputra ◽  
Mohamad El Gharamti
Keyword(s):  
Parameter Estimation ◽  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Kalman Filter ◽  
Earth System Model ◽  
System Model ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data ◽  
Parameter Values

<p>Ocean biogeochemical (BGC) models utilize a large number of poorly-constrained global parameters to mimic unresolved processes and reproduce the observed complex spatio-temporal patterns. Large model errors stem primarily from inaccuracies in these parameters whose optimal values can vary both in space and time. This study aims to demonstrate the ability of ensemble data assimilation (DA) methods to provide high-quality and improved BGC parameters within an Earth system model in idealized twin experiment framework.  We use the Norwegian Climate Prediction Model (NorCPM), which combines the Norwegian Earth System Model with the Dual-One-Step ahead smoothing-based Ensemble Kalman Filter (DOSA-EnKF). The work follows on Gharamti et al. (2017) that successfully demonstrates the approach for one-dimensional idealized ocean BGC models. We aim to estimate five spatially varying BGC parameters by assimilating Salinity and Temperature hydrographic profiles and surface BGC (Phytoplankton, Nitrate, Phosphorous, Silicate, and Oxygen) observations in a strongly coupled DA framework – i.e., jointly updating ocean and BGC state-parameters during the assimilation. The method converges quickly (less than a year), largely reducing the errors in the BGC parameters and eventually it is shown to perform nearly as well as that of the system with true parameter values. Optimal parameter values can also be recovered by assimilating climatological BGC observations and challenging sparse observational networks. The findings of this study demonstrate the applicability of the approach for tuning the system in a real framework.</p><p> </p><p><strong>References</strong>:</p><p>Gharamti, M. E., Tjiputra, J., Bethke, I., Samuelsen, A., Skjelvan, I., Bentsen, M., & Bertino, L. (2017). Ensemble data assimilation for ocean biogeochemical state and parameter estimation at different sites. Ocean Modelling, 112, 65-89.</p>

Initiation of ensemble data assimilation

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Zupanski ◽  
S. J. Fletcher ◽  
I. M. Navon ◽  
B. Uzunoglu ◽  
R. P. Heikes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data

Using a machine learning proxy for localization in ensemble data assimilation

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 931-944
Author(s):  
Johann M. Lacerda ◽  
Alexandre A. Emerick ◽  
Adolfo P. Pires
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data

Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: Theoretical Aspects

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 1710-1726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milija Zupanski
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Cost Function ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Ensemble Data ◽  
Analysis Error ◽  
Nonlinear Observation ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter

Abstract A new ensemble-based data assimilation method, named the maximum likelihood ensemble filter (MLEF), is presented. The analysis solution maximizes the likelihood of the posterior probability distribution, obtained by minimization of a cost function that depends on a general nonlinear observation operator. The MLEF belongs to the class of deterministic ensemble filters, since no perturbed observations are employed. As in variational and ensemble data assimilation methods, the cost function is derived using a Gaussian probability density function framework. Like other ensemble data assimilation algorithms, the MLEF produces an estimate of the analysis uncertainty (e.g., analysis error covariance). In addition to the common use of ensembles in calculation of the forecast error covariance, the ensembles in MLEF are exploited to efficiently calculate the Hessian preconditioning and the gradient of the cost function. A sufficient number of iterative minimization steps is 2–3, because of superior Hessian preconditioning. The MLEF method is well suited for use with highly nonlinear observation operators, for a small additional computational cost of minimization. The consistent treatment of nonlinear observation operators through optimization is an advantage of the MLEF over other ensemble data assimilation algorithms. The cost of MLEF is comparable to the cost of existing ensemble Kalman filter algorithms. The method is directly applicable to most complex forecast models and observation operators. In this paper, the MLEF method is applied to data assimilation with the one-dimensional Korteweg–de Vries–Burgers equation. The tested observation operator is quadratic, in order to make the assimilation problem more challenging. The results illustrate the stability of the MLEF performance, as well as the benefit of the cost function minimization. The improvement is noted in terms of the rms error, as well as the analysis error covariance. The statistics of innovation vectors (observation minus forecast) also indicate a stable performance of the MLEF algorithm. Additional experiments suggest the amplified benefit of targeted observations in ensemble data assimilation.

scholarly journals Convection-Permitting Forecasts Initialized with Continuously Cycling Limited-Area 3DVAR, Ensemble Kalman Filter, and “Hybrid” Variational–Ensemble Data Assimilation Systems

2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 716-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig S. Schwartz ◽  
Zhiquan Liu
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Skill Score ◽  
Limited Area ◽  
Computational Domain ◽  
Ensemble Data Assimilation ◽  
Ensemble Data ◽  
Precipitation Characteristics ◽  
High Precipitation

Abstract Analyses with 20-km horizontal grid spacing were produced from parallel continuously cycling three-dimensional variational (3DVAR), ensemble square root Kalman filter (EnSRF), and “hybrid” variational–ensemble data assimilation (DA) systems between 0000 UTC 6 May and 0000 UTC 21 June 2011 over a domain spanning the contiguous United States. Beginning 9 May, the 0000 UTC analyses initialized 36-h Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) forecasts containing a large convection-permitting 4-km nest. These 4-km 3DVAR-, EnSRF-, and hybrid-initialized forecasts were compared to benchmark WRF forecasts initialized by interpolating 0000 UTC Global Forecast System (GFS) analyses onto the computational domain. While important differences regarding mean state characteristics of the 20-km DA systems were noted, verification efforts focused on the 4-km precipitation forecasts. The 3DVAR-, hybrid-, and EnSRF-initialized 4-km precipitation forecasts performed similarly regarding general precipitation characteristics, such as timing of the diurnal cycle, and all three forecast sets had high precipitation biases at heavier rainfall rates. However, meaningful differences emerged regarding precipitation placement as quantified by the fractions skill score. For most forecast hours, the hybrid-initialized 4-km precipitation forecasts were better than the EnSRF-, 3DVAR-, and GFS-initialized forecasts, and the improvement was often statistically significant at the 95th percentile. These results demonstrate the potential of limited-area continuously cycling hybrid DA configurations and suggest additional hybrid development is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document