Five-year outcomes of an oropharynx-directed treatment approach for unknown primary of the head and neck

Abstract Introduction/Objective HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is biologically and clinically unique and has a survival advantage over other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. In December 2017 College of American Pathologist published guidelines for testing HPV status in head and neck cancer. It was recommended that pathologists perform HR-HPV testing on head and neck squamous cell carcinomas from all patients with known oropharyngeal SCC not previously tested for HR-HPV, with suspected oropharyngeal SCC, or with metastatic SCC of unknown primary. The aim of this study was to determine the compliance of pathologists following the CAP guidelines. Methods Cases that underwent HPV testing using p16 immunohistochemistry for the years 2017 and 2019 were retrieved. Based on the guidelines, p16 testing was designated as “indicated” or “not indicated”. Results There were 196 cases in which p16 testing was performed in a period of 3 consecutive years. Of these, 175 were FNA/ biopsies and 21 were surgical resections. In 69 cases (56 FNAs and 13 biopsies) the biopsy was performed on neck masses with unknown primary. The compliance for p16 testing in OPC and Lymph nodes with metastatic SCC of unknown primary was 100%. In 34 (17.3%) cases p16 testing was not indicated, the most common reason being wrong site (85%) including the larynx, oral tongue, the floor of the mouth, buccal mucosa, and nasal mass. Of the unindicated p16s, 20 (58%) were received in consultation for continuity of care. Conclusion Not being clear about the site of the tumor is the most common reason for unindicated p16 testing. A clear designation of biopsy site and proper communication between pathologist and surgeon can improve utilization of p16 testing in head and neck carcinomas.

Download Full-text

Swedish National Multicenter Study on Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Treatment on Survival

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1712106 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Lars Axelsson ◽

Erik Holmberg ◽

Jan Nyman ◽

Anders Högmo ◽

Helena Sjödin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Neck Dissection ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Multicenter Study ◽

Performance Status ◽

Cancer Of Unknown Primary ◽

Unknown Primary ◽

N Stage

Abstract Introduction Head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) is a rare condition whose prognostic factors that are significant for survival vary between studies. No randomized treatment study has been performed thus far, and the optimal treatment is not established. Objective The present study aimed to explore various prognostic factors and compare the two main treatments for HNCUP: neck dissection and (chemo) radiation vs primary (chemo) radiation. Methods A national multicenter study was performed with data from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register (SweHNCR) and from the patients' medical records from 2008 to 2012. Results Two-hundred and sixty HNCUP patients were included. The tumors were HPV-positive in 80%. The overall 5-year survival rate of patients treated with curative intent was 71%. Age (p < 0.001), performance status (p= 0.036), and N stage (p= 0.046) were significant factors for overall survival according to the multivariable analysis. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation (122 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 73%, and treatment with primary (chemo) radiation (87 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 71%, with no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival between the 2 groups. Conclusions Age, performance status, and N stage were significant prognostic factors. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation and primary (chemo) radiation gave similar survival outcomes. A randomized treatment study that includes quality of life is needed to establish the optimal treatment.

Download Full-text