scholarly journals Distinct biomarker and behavioral profiles of human papillomavirus-related oropharynx cancer patients by age

Oral Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 104522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole Fakhry ◽  
Tim Waterboer ◽  
William H. Westra ◽  
Lisa M. Rooper ◽  
Melina Windon ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Z.H. Fullerton ◽  
S.S. Butler ◽  
B.A. Mahal ◽  
V. Muralidhar ◽  
J.D. Schoenfeld ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1015-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liselotte Dahlgren ◽  
Hanna (Mellin) Dahlstrand ◽  
David Lindquist ◽  
Anders Högmo ◽  
Linda Björnestål ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
T.G. Krivonis

The study analyzed the personal and behavioral characteristics of cancer patients in the context of having a psychological profile with a certain level of adaptation. Based on informed consent in Medical- psychological center of Vinnitsa National Pirogov Memorial Medical University and Vinnytsa Regional Clinical Oncology Clinic during 2015-2019 years 288 cancer patients were examined. Assessment of personality traits conducted using the Freiburg Personality Inventory, FPI-B, behavioral patterns - Ways of Coping Questionnaire, WCQ by R. Lazarus and S. Folkman. Cancer causes the actualization of psychological constructs and the stress-protective mechanisms involved in overcoming stress. In families with impaired family adaptation, a higher incidence of patients with maladaptive personality and behavioral profiles was found. Patients with a disharmonious profile are at risk for developing psychological maladaptation in the stressful situation of a life-threatening illness. The personal and behavioral profile of the cancer patient is an important criterion for the choice of medical-psychological help and should be taken into account when applying psychological interventions to the patient and his immediate family (family).


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole G. Chau ◽  
Guilherme Rabinowits ◽  
Robert I. Haddad

2003 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Widschwendter ◽  
Anya Blassnig ◽  
Annemarie Wiedemair ◽  
Elisabeth Müller-Holzner ◽  
Hannes M Müller ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 83-86
Author(s):  
T.M. Schisler ◽  
A.K. Bhavsar ◽  
B.P. Whitcomb ◽  
J.H. Freeman ◽  
M.A. Washington ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Xu ◽  
Yichao Qiu ◽  
Shuang Yuan ◽  
Hongjing Wang

Abstract Background To estimate the prognostic relevance of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV 18 in patients with cervical cancer. Method We searched PubMed, EMBASE, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), CNKI, and Wanfang databases to search primary articles illustrating the survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients with or without HPV 16/18 infection. A meta-analysis was conducted to generate a combined hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 13 studies were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that HPV 16 positive did not have any impact on OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI = 0.37–1.54; P = 0.44). Cervical cancer patiensts infected with HPV 18 had worse OS (HR, 1.66; 95% CI = 1.28–2.17; P = 0.0001), DFS (HR, 2.10; 95% CI = 1.73–2.54; P < 0.0001) and worse PFS (HR, 2.97; 95% CI = 1.69–5.23; P = 0.00012) compared with those not infected with HPV 18. cervical cancer patiensts infected with HPV 18 had worse PFS compared with those infected with HPV 16 ((HR, 1.34; 95% CI = 1.06–1.70; P = 0.01). Conclusion Cervical cancer patients infected with HPV 18 had worse survival compared with cervical cancer patients with HPV 16 infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document