Practice Guidelines for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P58-P58
Author(s):  
David Richard Friedland ◽  
Nima L. Shemirani

Objective To identify and compare patterns of treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss among otolaryngologists and primary care physicians. Methods A multiple choice and Likert scale survey was mailed to 1,306 otolaryngologists and primary care physicians throughout our state, regarding treatment and management approaches to SSNHL. Survey answers were analyzed by scope of practice and years of experience. Treatment protocols were compared among family practitioners, internists, general otolaryngologists, and otologists. Results A surprisingly large number of general practitioners treat SSNHL independent of an otolaryngologist. General practitioners as a group, however, are significantly less impressed than otolaryngologists that steroids are an effective treatment (p<0.0001). Over 99% of otolaryngologists start oral steroids at evaluation, as compared to approximately 30% of all general practitioners. Of those general practitioners treating on their own, without otolaryngology consultation, 78% use oral steroids. The vast majority of otolaryngologists start therapy with at least 60 mg of prednisone, while lower doses and Medrol dose packs are more commonly used by general practitioners. Otolaryngologists are more likely to treat with steroids beyond 1 week of hearing loss onset, while general practitioners overwhelmingly will only treat within the first week. Over 50% of otolaryngologists also add anti-viral medications. Conclusions Significant differences exist in the management of SSNHL between otolaryngologists and general practitioners. The lack of strong evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of SSNHL may underlie the variability in management by first-line providers.

Author(s):  
Benjamin Ng ◽  
Matthew G. Crowson ◽  
Vincent Lin

Abstract Background Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is a medical emergency requiring immediate attention as delayed treatment can lead to permanent and devastating consequences. Primary care physicians are likely the first to be presented with SSNHL and therefore have the crucial role of recognizing it and initiating timely and appropriate management. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the current knowledge and practice trends pertaining to the diagnosis and management of SSNHL among family physicians in Canada. Methods An 18-question survey targeting Canadian family physicians was marketed through two, physician-only discussion groups on the social media platform Facebook. Responses were collected between August 1st and December 22nd 2019 then aggregated and quantified. Results 52 family physicians submitted responses. 94.2% (n = 49) reported that in their practice, unilateral SSNHL warrants urgent referral to otolaryngology and 84.6% (n = 44) reported that unilateral sudden-onset hearing loss warrants urgent referral for audiological testing. 73.1% of participants (n = 38) reported that they would attempt to differentiate between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss if presented with unilateral, acute or sudden-onset hearing loss. 61.5% (n = 32) would rely on tuning fork tests to inform management decisions, as compared to 94.2% (n = 49) relying on case history and 88.5% (n = 46) on otoscopy. 76.9% (n = 40) would prescribe corticosteroids if presented with confirmed, unilateral SSNHL. Conclusion The majority of family physicians in the study would make appropriate referral and treatment decisions in the management of SSNHL, understanding it is a medical emergency. Tuning fork tests are under-utilized for informing management decisions compared to other means of differentiating conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Further research is needed to understand why some family physicians do not prescribe corticosteroids for treatment of SSNHL, which may then identify any gaps in knowledge or inform improvements in clinical protocol. Graphical abstract


Author(s):  
Vivek Samor ◽  
Sukhdev Khadav ◽  
Pooja Arya ◽  
Deepchand . ◽  
Ramniwas Dhaka

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of intratympanic dexamethasone in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss and to determine factor affecting treatment outcome for sudden sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Prospective study was conducted on 24 patients of sudden sensorineural hearing loss between October 2019 to February 2020 in the department of ENT, OPD, SPMC, Bikaner. Group A were given oral steroids: prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day (maximal dose is 60 mg/day) full dose 14 days, then tapered over next 14 days. Group B were given intratympanic dexamethasone 4 mg/ml, 0.5 ml into middle ear space (into the posterior inferior quadrant) every 7 days for a total of 4 weeks. Audiogram was performed at end of every week for 4 weeks.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Overall, 58% (n=14) patients showed improvement in pure-tone average. For ≤3 days of presentation; out of total 6 patients, 83.33% cases recovered. For 4 to 7 days of presentation; out of total 10 patients, 80% cases recovered. For 8 to 14 days presentation; out of total 8 patients 12.5% cases recovered (p=0.005).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We suggest the treatment approach in which interaural time difference is used adjuvantly with oral steroids.</p>


Author(s):  
Srirangaprasad K. ◽  
Vinay Kumar V. ◽  
Pruthvi Raj S.

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a common otologic emergency which occurs due to various etiologies affecting the inner ear. Majority of treatment protocols are focussed on glucocorticoids either systemically or through intratympanic route due to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a pre and post observational clinical study conducted in patients visiting Rajarajeswari medical college between December 2015 to December 2016 with a history of sudden hearing loss (30 patients). 6 of these patients presented with bilateral hearing loss, and we considered each ear as a separate case, giving us a total of 36 cases. A diagnosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss was made based on the patient’s history and audiological evaluation. All the patients were treated with 3 doses of Intratympanic injections of Dexamethasone (4 mg/ml), on alternate days. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) and brain stem evoked response audiometry (BERA) was done pre-treatment, at 1 and 6 months after treatment.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Mean age of our patients was 44.8. 80% of our patients were male. The average PTA gain, 1 month after treatment was 27.917 and 6 months after treatment was 29.639 with a p value of &lt;0.001, which correlated with BERA. At the end of 6 months after treatment, 15 cases had complete recovery (41.7%), 9 cases showed slight recovery (25%), 6 cases had marked recovery and 6 cases (16.7%) had no recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Intratympanic dexamethasone injections can be used as the first line of treatment with minimal side effects. </p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zvonko Zivaljevic ◽  
Ljubica Zivic ◽  
Natasa Mihailovic ◽  
Miodrag Zivkovic ◽  
Branko Vorkapic ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is manifested by the loss of hearing for more than 30 dB at three consecutive frequencies in the timeframe of 72 h. It is of unclear etiology and pathogenesis, which leads to the use of different therapeutic methods. Treatment protocols are not compliant, making it difficult to objectively quantify their impact. The aim of this study was to show the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as the only method for the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Methods. This retrospective study included 20 patients treated for sudden sensorineural hearing loss with hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) in the period from 2004 to 2014. The study was conducted in the specialized medical clinic for hyperbaric and underwater medicine, HBO Medical Center in Belgrade. The patients were treated according to the following protocol: a session of 60 min at the pressure of 2 bars (2ATA) two times a day, a total of 30 sessions. Assessment of the therapy effects was performed by observing the change in the hearing threshold at the frequencies of 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 Hz at the end of the treatment. Results. After the completion of treatment according to the protocol, a full hearing recovery (total improvement of hearing damage or achieving final hearing threshold above 25 dB) was found in 11 (55%) of the patients. A partial recovery (hearing improvement of up to 15 dB, and a final hearing threshold below 45 dB) occurred in 4 (20%) of the patients. In 5 (25%) of the patients, improvement was not verified (there was no recovery or it was less than 5 dB). The average absolute hearing recovery was 24.94 dB. The mean relative hearing recovery was 65.45%. Conclusion. Because of the unclear multifactorial etiopathogenesis of this disease, there are many therapeutic protocols. Based on the results of our study HBO therapy could be recommended primarily as the treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss.


2011 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 813-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Coelho ◽  
Leroy R. Thacker ◽  
David W. Hsu

Objectives. To evaluate current trends in the management of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), determine if variance in diagnostic and treatment protocols exists, and compare diagnostic and treatment strategies of ISSNHL between nonotologists/neurotologists (NONs) and otologists/neurotologists (ONs). Study Design. Cross-sectional survey of practicing otolaryngologists. Setting. Otolaryngology practices within the United States. Subjects and Methods. In January 2010, a survey was mailed to 500 NONs and 500 ONs. Data were collected and analyzed using χ2, standard deviations, and variance. Results. A variety and distribution of responses were seen in the definition of ISSNHL, including dB loss necessary for diagnosis, number of consecutive frequencies involved, and maximum duration of hearing loss. Differences in diagnostic tools were also seen, with 50.4% of respondents (NON 34.2%, ON 66.7%; P = .0001) always using magnetic resonance imaging in their workup. Of the total respondents, 26.7% (NON 35.0%, ON 18.3%; P < .0001) preferred oral steroids alone; 22.1% (NON 11.7%, ON 32.5%; P < .0001) preferred a combination of oral and intratympanic steroids. Of the respondents, 68.6% (NON 57.5%, ON 80.0%; P = .0003) would continue with additional treatment after partial response; 20.8% (NON 33.3%, ON 8.3%; P < .005) would retreat with oral steroids alone and 46.6% (NON 35.8%, ON 57.3%; P < .05) with intratympanic injections. Overall, 69.2% (NON 45.8%, ON 92.5%; P = .0001) were very comfortable managing ISSNHL. Conclusion. Significant differences exist in the diagnosis and treatment of ISSNHL. Such lack of uniformity highlights the need for strong evidence-based research—ultimately leading to formalized practice guidelines and educational outreach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (692) ◽  
pp. 144-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpa Ojha ◽  
Arthur Henderson ◽  
Warren Bennett ◽  
Matthew Clark

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139
Author(s):  
Rabi Hembrom ◽  
Indranil Sen ◽  
Bina Tamang ◽  
Satadal Mandal ◽  
Amit Chakrabarti

Introduction Oral steroids currently represent the standard treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of intratympanic dexamethasone injection for treating ‘Idiopathic sudden sensori-neural hearing loss’ (ISSNHL) not improved with conventional oral steroid. Materials and Methods A prospective study was conducted on 30 patients refractory to oral steroid therapy between June 2017 to May 2018. ‘Intratympanic dexamethasone injection’ (ITDI) was given every week for 3 consecutive weeks. Hearing was assessed by performing pure tone audiogram before every ITDI and also 1 week after the completion of treatment. Results Hearing improvement was found in 19 out of the 30 cases (63.3%).   Conclusions Intratympanic dexamethasone significantly improves the prognosis of ISSNHL and is a safe, inexpensive and effective treatment.


Author(s):  
Arshed Alil ◽  
Omar Mohammad Shafi ◽  
Farah Deeba

<p class="abstract"><strong>Introduction: </strong>Idiopathic Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is defined as a hearing loss of 30 dB or more, affecting at least 3 consecutive frequencies, occurring within 3 days without any identifiable cause. To find the effectiveness of intratympanic steroid injection (ITS) for hearing recovery and comparing the results with oral steroids therapy. </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Materials and Methods: </strong>This prospective study was done in the department of ENT, Govt medical college, Srinagar, over a period of two years. A total 60 patients of ISSHL was selected for the study. Through examination, otoscopy and pure tone audiometry (PTA) was done for all the cases before initiation of therapy. Thirty patients received and thirty patients received oral prednisolone for a protocol-based dose and duration. PTA was repeated every two weeks over duration of two months for documentation of improvement of hearing on pure tone four frequency averages.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Chances of recovery were more with middle ear injection group in 18 patients (60%) in comparison to oral steroids in 14 patients (46.66%). Complete recovery was found in six cases (20%) in injection group and four cases (13.33%) in oral steroid group. The ITS group showed a better control of associated symptoms like dizziness, tinnitus and vertigo are controlled better with ITS (73.33%) than oral steroid group (56.66%). The ITS group showed faster recovery also with lower side effects.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intratympanic dexamethasone injection is more effective in comparison to oral prednisolone for the management of ISSHL, however larger studies may be required.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document