Translational Bioinformatics and Clinical Research (Biomedical) Informatics

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Joseph Sirintrapun ◽  
Ahmet Zehir ◽  
Aijazuddin Syed ◽  
JianJiong Gao ◽  
Nikolaus Schultz ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Joseph Sirintrapun ◽  
Ahmet Zehir ◽  
Aijazuddin Syed ◽  
JianJiong Gao ◽  
Nikolaus Schultz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C. Daniel ◽  
E. Albuisson ◽  
T. Dart ◽  
P. Avillach ◽  
M. Cuggia ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 536-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Diomidous ◽  
I. N. Sarkar ◽  
K. Takabayashi ◽  
A. Ziegler ◽  
A. T. McCray ◽  
...  

SummaryBackground: Medicine and biomedical sciences have become data-intensive fields, which, at the same time, enable the application of data-driven approaches and require sophisticated data analysis and data mining methods. Biomedical informatics provides a proper interdisciplinary context to integrate data and knowledge when processing available information, with the aim of giving effective decision-making support in clinics and translational research.Objectives: To reflect on different perspectives related to the role of data analysis and data mining in biomedical informatics. Methods: On the occasion of the 50th year of Methods of Information in Medicine a symposium was organized, which reflected on opportunities, challenges and priorities of organizing, representing and analysing data, information and knowledge in biomedicine and health care. The contributions of experts with a variety of backgrounds in the area of biomedical data analysis have been collected as one outcome of this symposium, in order to provide a broad, though coherent, overview of some of the most interesting aspects of the field.Results: The paper presents sections on data accumulation and data-driven approaches in medical informatics, data and knowledge integration, statistical issues for the evaluation of data mining models, translational bioinformatics and bioinformatics aspects of genetic epidemiology.Conclusions: Biomedical informatics represents a natural framework to properly and effectively apply data analysis and data mining methods in a decision-making context. In the future, it will be necessary to preserve the inclusive nature of the field and to foster an increasing sharing of data and methods between researchers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 08-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Bellazzi

SummaryBig data are receiving an increasing attention in biomedicine and healthcare. It is therefore important to understand the reason why big data are assuming a crucial role for the biomedical informatics community. The capability of handling big data is becoming an enabler to carry out unprecedented research studies and to implement new models of healthcare delivery. Therefore, it is first necessary to deeply understand the four elements that constitute big data, namely Volume, Variety, Velocity, and Veracity, and their meaning in practice. Then, it is mandatory to understand where big data are present, and where they can be beneficially collected. There are research fields, such as translational bioinformatics, which need to rely on big data technologies to withstand the shock wave of data that is generated every day. Other areas, ranging from epidemiology to clinical care, can benefit from the exploitation of the large amounts of data that are nowadays available, from personal monitoring to primary care. However, building big data-enabled systems carries on relevant implications in terms of reproducibility of research studies and management of privacy and data access; proper actions should be taken to deal with these issues. An interesting consequence of the big data scenario is the availability of new software, methods, and tools, such as map-reduce, cloud computing, and concept drift machine learning algorithms, which will not only contribute to big data research, but may be beneficial in many biomedical informatics applications. The way forward with the big data opportunity will require properly applied engineering principles to design studies and applications, to avoid preconceptions or over-enthusiasms, to fully exploit the available technologies, and to improve data processing and data management regulations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 835-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette L Valenta ◽  
Emma A Meagher ◽  
Umberto Tachinardi ◽  
Justin Starren

Abstract Since the inception of the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program in 2006, leaders in education across CTSA sites have been developing and updating core competencies for Clinical and Translational Science (CTS) trainees. By 2009, 14 competency domains, including biomedical informatics, had been identified and published. Since that time, the evolution of the CTSA program, changes in the practice of CTS, the rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), the growth of biomedical informatics, the explosion of big data, and the realization that some of the competencies had proven to be difficult to apply in practice have made it clear that the competencies should be updated. This paper describes the process undertaken and puts forth a new set of competencies that has been recently endorsed by the Clinical Research Informatics Workgroup of AMIA. In addition to providing context and background for the current version of the competencies, we hope this will serve as a model for revision of competencies over time.


1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 448-452
Author(s):  
LA Tedesco ◽  
JE Albino ◽  
WM Feagans ◽  
RS Mackenzie

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Madalena Walsh ◽  
Nan Bernstein Ratner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document