The asymmetry of U.S. monetary policy: Evidence from a threshold Taylor rule with time-varying threshold values

2017 ◽  
Vol 473 ◽  
pp. 522-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Zhu ◽  
Haiqiang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Taylor Rule ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
The Asymmetry

Can a Taylor rule better explain the Fed’s monetary policy through the 1920s and 1930s? A nonlinear cliometric analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Damette ◽  
Fredj Jawadi ◽  
Antoine Parent
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Business Cycle ◽  
Interwar Period ◽  
Taylor Rule ◽  
Structural Break ◽  
Output Gap ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Working Paper ◽  
The Great Depression ◽  
Monetary Regimes

Abstract This paper investigates whether a variant of a Taylor rule applied to historical monetary data of the interwar period is useful to gain a better understanding of the Fed’s conduct of monetary policy over the period 1920–1940. To this end, we considered a standard Taylor rule (using two drivers: output gap and inflation gap) and proxied them differently for robustness. Further, we extended this Taylor rule to a nonlinear framework while enabling its coefficient to be time-varying and to change with regard to the phases in business cycle, in order to better capture any further asymmetry in the data and the structural break induced by the Great Depression. Accordingly, we showed two important findings. First, the linearity hypothesis was rejected, and we found that an On/Off Taylor Rule is appropriate to reproduce the conduct of monetary policy during the interwar period more effectively (the activation of drivers only occurs per regime). Second, unlike Field [Field, A. 2015. “The Taylor Rule in the 1920s.” Working Paper], we validated the use of a Taylor rule to explain the conduct of monetary policy in history more effectively. Consequently, this nonlinear Taylor rule specification provides interesting results for a better understanding of monetary regimes during the interwar period, and offers useful complements to narrative monetary history.

Term Premium Dynamics and the Taylor Rule

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 1750011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gallmeyer ◽  
Burton Hollifield ◽  
Francisco Palomino ◽  
Stanley Zin
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Term Structure ◽  
Taylor Rule ◽  
Exchange Economy ◽  
Bond Pricing ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Inflation Dynamics ◽  
Term Premium ◽  
Nominal Term

We explore the bond-pricing implications of an exchange economy where preference shocks result in time-varying term premiums in real yields with a Taylor rule determining inflation dynamics and nominal term premiums. We calibrate the model by matching the term structure of the means and volatilities of nominal yields. Unlike a model with exogenous inflation, a Taylor rule matching empirical properties of inflation leads to nominal term premiums that are volatile at long maturities. Increasing monetary policy aggressiveness decreases the level and volatility of nominal yields.

scholarly journals Modeling changes in US monetary policy with a time-varying nonlinear Taylor rule

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh D. M. Nguyen ◽  
Efthymios G. Pavlidis ◽  
David A. Peel
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Economic Activity ◽  
Sequential Monte Carlo ◽  
Taylor Rule ◽  
Structural Break ◽  
Monetary Economics ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Sequential Monte Carlo Methods ◽  
Asymmetric Preferences ◽  
Us Monetary Policy

Abstract The monetary economics literature has highlighted four issues that are important in evaluating US monetary policy since the late 1960s: (i) time variation in policy parameters, (ii) asymmetric preferences, (iii) real-time nature of data, and (iv) heteroskedasticity. In this paper, we exploit advances in sequential monte carlo methods to estimate a time-varying nonlinear Taylor rule that addresses these four issues simultaneously. Our findings suggest that US monetary policy has experienced substantial changes in terms of both the response to inflation and to real economic activity, as well as changes in preferences. These changes cannot be captured adequately by a single structural break at the late 1970s, as has been commonly assumed in the literature, and play a non-trivial role in economic performance.

scholarly journals MARKOV SWITCHING AND THE TAYLOR PRINCIPLE

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 913-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian J. Murray ◽  
Alex Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy ◽  
David H. Papell
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Recent Trend ◽  
Taylor Rule ◽  
Markov Switching ◽  
Qualitative Difference ◽  
Historical Record ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Monetary Regimes ◽  
Time Varying Parameters ◽  
The Interest Rate

Early research on the Taylor rule typically divided the data exogenously into pre-Volcker and Volcker–Greenspan subsamples. We contribute to the recent trend of endogenizing changes in monetary policy by estimating a real-time forward-looking Taylor rule with endogenous Markov switching coefficients and variance. The response of the interest rate to inflation is regime-dependent, with the pre- and post-Volcker samples containing monetary regimes where the Fed did and did not follow the Taylor principle. Although the Fed consistently adhered to the Taylor principle before 1973 and after 1984, it followed the Taylor principle from 1975 to 1979 and did not follow the Taylor principle from 1980 to 1984. We also find that the Fed only responded to real economic activity during the states in which the Taylor principle held. Our results are consistent with the idea that exogenously dividing postwar monetary policy into pre- and post-Volcker samples is misleading. The greatest qualitative difference between our results and recent research employing time-varying parameters is that we find that the Fed did not adhere to the Taylor principle during most of Paul Volcker's tenure, a finding that accords with the historical record of monetary policy.

Time‐Varying Response of Monetary Policy to Macroeconomic Conditions

1999 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 584-593
Author(s):  
Chung‐Hua Shen ◽  
David R. Hakes ◽  
Kenneth Brown
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Time Varying ◽  
Macroeconomic Conditions

Natural disasters and monetary policy: evidence from an augmented Taylor rule

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Apergis ◽  
James E. Payne
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Interest Rate ◽  
Natural Disasters ◽  
Natural Disaster ◽  
Taylor Rule ◽  
Nominal Interest Rate ◽  
Policy Response ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Short Run

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the short-run monetary policy response to five different types of natural disasters (geophysical, meteorological, hydrological, climatological and biological) with respect to developed and developing countries, respectively. Design/methodology/approach An augmented Taylor rule monetary policy model is estimated using systems generalized method of moments panel estimation over the period 2000–2018 for a panel of 40 developed and 77 developing countries, respectively. Findings In the case of developed countries, the greatest nominal interest rate response originates from geophysical, meteorological, hydrological and climatological disasters, whereas for developing countries the nominal interest rate response is the greatest for geophysical and meteorological disasters. For both developed and developing countries, the results suggest the monetary authorities will pursue expansionary monetary policies in the short-run to lower nominal interest rates; however, the magnitude of the monetary response varies across the type of natural disaster. Originality/value First, unlike previous studies, which focused on a specific type of natural disaster, this study examines whether the short-run monetary policy response differs across the type of natural disaster. Second, in relation to previous studies, the analysis encompasses a much larger panel data set to include 117 countries differentiated between developed and developing countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document