Response to water deficit of semi-desert wild potato Solanum kurtzianum genotypes collected from different altitudes

Plant Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 110911
Author(s):  
Verónica N. Ibañez ◽  
P. Carolina Kozub ◽  
Carina V. González ◽  
Nicolás Jerez ◽  
Ricardo W. Masuelli ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Trenti ◽  
Silvia Lorenzi ◽  
Pier Luigi Bianchedi ◽  
Daniele Grossi ◽  
Osvaldo Failla ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Understanding the complexity of the vine plant’s response to water deficit represents a major challenge for sustainable winegrowing. Regulation of water use requires a coordinated action between scions and rootstocks on which cultivars are generally grafted to cope with phylloxera infestations. In this regard, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach was applied on an ‘ad hoc’ association mapping panel including different Vitis species, in order to dissect the genetic basis of transpiration-related traits and to identify genomic regions of grape rootstocks associated with drought tolerance mechanisms. The panel was genotyped with the GrapeReSeq Illumina 20 K SNP array and SSR markers, and infrared thermography was applied to estimate stomatal conductance values during progressive water deficit. Results In the association panel the level of genetic diversity was substantially lower for SNPs loci (0.32) than for SSR (0.87). GWAS detected 24 significant marker-trait associations along the various stages of drought-stress experiment and 13 candidate genes with a feasible role in drought response were identified. Gene expression analysis proved that three of these genes (VIT_13s0019g03040, VIT_17s0000g08960, VIT_18s0001g15390) were actually induced by drought stress. Genetic variation of VIT_17s0000g08960 coding for a raffinose synthase was further investigated by resequencing the gene of 85 individuals since a SNP located in the region (chr17_10,497,222_C_T) was significantly associated with stomatal conductance. Conclusions Our results represent a step forward towards the dissection of genetic basis that modulate the response to water deprivation in grape rootstocks. The knowledge derived from this study may be useful to exploit genotypic and phenotypic diversity in practical applications and to assist further investigations.


Planta ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 231 (3) ◽  
pp. 705-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inês Trindade ◽  
Cláudio Capitão ◽  
Tamas Dalmay ◽  
Manuel Pedro Fevereiro ◽  
Dulce Metelo dos Santos

Plant Biology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 694-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Labra ◽  
A. Ghiani ◽  
S. Citterio ◽  
S. Sgorbati ◽  
F. Sala ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. DE A. SILVA ◽  
J. L. JIFON ◽  
J. A. G. DA SILVA ◽  
C. M. DOS SANTOS ◽  
V. SHARMA

SUMMARYThe relationships between physiological variables and sugarcane productivity under water deficit conditions were investigated in field studies during 2005 and 2006 in Weslaco, Texas, USA. A total of 78 genotypes and two commercial varieties were studied, one of which was drought-tolerant (TCP93-4245) and the other drought-sensitive (TCP87-3388). All genotypes were subjected to two irrigation regimes: a control well-watered treatment (wet) and a moderate water-deficit stress (dry) treatment for a period of 90 days. Maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), estimated chlorophyll content (SPAD index), leaf temperature (LT), leaf relative water content (RWC) and productivity were measured. The productivity of all genotypes was, on average, affected negatively; however, certain genotypes did not suffer significant reduction. Under water deficit, the productivity of the genotypes was positively and significantly correlated with Fv/Fm, SPAD index and RWC, while LT had a negative correlation. These findings suggest that genotypes exhibiting traits of high RWC values, high chlorophyll contents and high photosynthetic radiation use efficiency under low moisture availability should be targeted for selection and variety development in programmes aimed at improving sugarcane for drought prone environments.


PROTOPLASMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyanan Pipatsitee ◽  
Cattarin Theerawitaya ◽  
Rujira Tiasarum ◽  
Thapanee Samphumphuang ◽  
Harminder Pal Singh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rajkumar Dhakar ◽  
M. A. Sarath Chandran ◽  
Shivani Nagar ◽  
V. Visha Kumari ◽  
A. V. M. Subbarao ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga M. Grant ◽  
Abigail W. Johnson ◽  
Michael J. Davies ◽  
Celia M. James ◽  
David W. Simpson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document