scholarly journals Framework for the Life Cycle Assessment of non-permanent process units in volatile chemical recycling process chains

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Johanna Hagen ◽  
Selin Erkisi-Arici ◽  
Patrick de Wit ◽  
Felipe Cerdas ◽  
Christoph Herrmann
Procedia CIRP ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 212-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilhem Grimaud ◽  
Nicolas Perry ◽  
Bertrand Laratte

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina F. Cosate de Andrade ◽  
Patrícia M. S. Souza ◽  
Otávio Cavalett ◽  
Ana R. Morales

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1919-1933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucien Duclos ◽  
Raphaël Chattot ◽  
Laetitia Dubau ◽  
Pierre-Xavier Thivel ◽  
Guillaume Mandil ◽  
...  

Selective Pt and Co separation has been achieved, recycled Pt/C particles were synthesized, and excellent electrochemical properties have been observed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 913 ◽  
pp. 1054-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Zheng Gong ◽  
Ying Liang Tian ◽  
Li Juan Zhang

Foam glass is a new insulation building materials and plays an important role in building energy efficiency for its many excellent performances, such as small thermal conductivity, low coefficient of thermal expansion and high mechanical strength. Generally, the manufacturing process of foam glass mainly can be classified into two typical processes, the waste glass recycling process and glass melting process. In this paper, the process-oriented life cycle assessment is used to quantitative analyze and evaluate the environmental load, such as energy consumption and pollutant emission of the two typical processes. The results show that the environmental load of the glass melting process takes place in two stages of the foaming and annealing, and the raw material extraction, while the waste glass recycling process mainly come from foaming and annealing. Regarding the energy consumption of foam glass, waste glass process is lower 22.4% than the glass melting process, while carbon emissions is lower 24.8%, and the comprehensive environmental impact is lower 40%. Therefore, the findings will guide and promote the new technology application for the energy saving and green technology applications in foam glass industry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 8613
Author(s):  
Lucas Rosson ◽  
Nolene Byrne

The development of textile recycling solutions is an area of intense research and commercialization. Chemical recycling solutions are becoming increasingly popular due to their ability to separate complex blends and retain or improve the value of the original fiber. The chemical recycling of cotton requires a pre-treatment step to reduce the degree of polymerization (DP). The DP can be reduced in a variety of ways, and here, the environmental footprints of two different pre-treatment approaches are examined using life cycle assessment (LCA); sodium hydroxide pre-treatment and sulphuric acid pre-treatment. We find that the acid pre-treatment has a significantly lower environmental footprint across all impact categories calculated. This is attributed to the lower treatment times required and the lower material and energy requirements for the manufacture of chemicals. The results were normalized to show the most significant impact categories for each pre-treatment, and further environmental implications of the pre-treatments are discussed. The findings will aid academia and industry in implementing the most environmentally benign processes in chemical cotton recycling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document