scholarly journals Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Investigations on Laser Bending of AISI304 Stainless Steel Sheet

2013 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 528-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuntal Maji ◽  
Ruchir Shukla ◽  
A.K. Nath ◽  
D.K. Pratihar
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Steel Sheet ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Stainless Steel Sheet ◽  
Laser Bending ◽  
Element Analysis

Verification of a Finite Element Analysis Procedure for Modeling the Nonlinear, Monotonic In-Plane Behavior of 4 Inch, Schedule 10, Stainless Steel, 90° Elbows

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
James K. Wilkins
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Nonlinear Behavior ◽  
Shell Element ◽  
Analysis Procedure ◽  
Hoop Strain ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Butt Welding ◽  
Strain Data

A project has been conducted to verify a finite element analysis procedure for studying the nonlinear behavior of 90°, stainless steel, 4 inch schedule 10, butt welding elbows. Two displacement controlled monotonic in-plane tests were conducted, one closing and one opening, and the loads, displacements, and strains at several locations were recorded. Stacked 90° tee rosette gages were used in both tests because of their ability to measure strain over a small area. ANSYS shell element 181 was used in the FEA reconciliations. The FEA models incorporated detailed geometric measurements of the specimens, including the welds, and material stress-strain data obtained from the attached straight piping. Initially, a mesh consisting of sixteen elements arrayed in 8 rings was used to analyze the elbow. The load-displacement correlation was quite good using this mesh, but the strain reconciliation was not. Analysis of the FEA results indicated that the axial and hoop strain gradients across the mid-section of the elbow were very high. In order to generate better strain correlations, the elbow mesh was refined in the mid-section of the elbow to include 48 elements per ring and an additional six rings, effectively increasing the element density by nine times. Using the refined mesh produced much better correlations with the strain data.

scholarly journals Finite Element Analysis of Camshaft Using Inventor Software

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 906-912
Author(s):  
Valentin Mereuta
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Cast Iron ◽  
3D Model ◽  
Steel Alloy ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Steel Aisi ◽  
The Comparative Study ◽  
Stainless Steel Aisi

Abstract: In this work the 3D model of the camshaft was done using Autodesk Inventor version 2021 with the literature data and finite element analysis is performed by applying restrictions and loads conditions, first by the absence of the torque and then by applying the torque. Three materials were analyzed in both situations: Cast Iron, Stainless Steel AISI 202 and Steel Alloy. Following the comparative study for the three materials, it can be specified the importance of the material for the construction of the camshaft. Keywords: Camshaft, Static analysis, Autodesk Inventor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document