A method for considering the spatial variations of dead layer thickness in HPGe detectors to improve the FEPE calculation of bulky samples

2017 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mohammad Modarresi ◽  
S. Farhad Masoudi ◽  
Majid Karimi
2017 ◽  
Vol 315 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Truong Thi Hong Loan ◽  
Vu Ngoc Ba ◽  
Truong Huu Ngan Thy ◽  
Huynh Thi Yen Hong ◽  
Ngo Quang Huy

2000 ◽  
Vol 655 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Sinnamon ◽  
R. M. Bowman ◽  
J. M. Gregg

AbstractThin film capacitors with barium strontium titanate (BST) dielectric layers of 7.5 to 950 nm were fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition. XRD and EDX analyses confirmed a strongly oriented BST cubic perovskite phase with the desired cation stoichiometry. Room temperature frequency dispersion (ε100 kHz / ε100 Hz) for all capacitors was greater than 0.75. Absolute values for the dielectric constant were slightly lower than expected. This was attributed to the use of Au top electrodes since the same sample showed up to a threefold increase in dielectric constant when Pt was used in place of Au. Dielectric constant as a function of thicknesses greater than 70 nm, was fitted using the series capacitor model. The large interfacial parameter ratio di / εi of 0.40 ± 0.05 nm implied a significant dead-layer component within the capacitor structure. Modelled consideration of the dielectric behaviour for BST films, whose total thickness was below that of the dead layer, predicted anomalies in the plots of d/ ε against d at the dead layer thickness. For the SRO/BST/Au system studied, no anomaly was observed. Therefore, either (i) 7.5 nm is an upper limit for the total dead layer thickness in this system, or (ii) dielectric collapse is not associated with a distinct interfacial dead layer, and is instead due to a through-film effect.


2001 ◽  
Vol 78 (12) ◽  
pp. 1724-1726 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Sinnamon ◽  
R. M. Bowman ◽  
J. M. Gregg

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (13) ◽  
pp. 132902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Podgorny ◽  
K. A. Vorotilov ◽  
A. S. Sigov ◽  
J. F. Scott

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 096001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Jiang ◽  
Qian Yue ◽  
Yu-Lan Li ◽  
Ke-Jun Kang ◽  
Yuan-Jing Li ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K. Abd El Gawad ◽  
Yushou Song

The main objective of this work is to produce an optimal modeling for our aged Planar-HPGe detector using Monte Carlo method (MC). That optimization included the analysis of the germanium dead (inactive) layer thickness for our old detection system (planar-HPGe detector). DL is one of the important parameters needed in order to obtain the smallest discrepancy between simulated and experimental measurements of detector efficiency. Also, precise determination of 235U enrichment for UO2 samples which is necessary for purposes of nuclear materials verification in the field of nuclear safeguards. The thickness of Germanium dead layer (DL) can be vary by time as it is not well known due to the existence of a transition zone where photons are strongly attenuated and absorbed, that cannot contribute to the total photon energy absorption which causes a significant decrease in efficiency. Therefore, using data provided by manufacturers since long years (manufacture date) in the detector simulation model is not convenient. As a result, some strong discrepancies appear between measured and simulated efficiency, in addition to that non-accurate results for 235U enrichment determination. The Monte Carlo method applied to overcome this difficulty was to vary the thickness of dead layer step by step in simulation, a good agreement (minimum deviation) between estimated and experimental efficiency was reached when a suitable germanium dead layer thickness was chosen. Calculations and measurements were performed for radioactive nuclear material samples in the form of UO2 powder with different sizes and enrichments at different locations, under different gamma-lines emitted after a-decay of the 235U nuclei. Results indicated that a good agreement between simulated and measured efficiencies is obtained using a value for the germanium dead layer thickness approximately (2.45 mm) six in comparison with (0.389 mm) provided by the detector manufacturer.


2009 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 1929-1934 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Ubyĭvovk ◽  
D. K. Loginov ◽  
I. Ya. Gerlovin ◽  
Yu. K. Dolgikh ◽  
Yu. P. Efimov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document