A sensitivity study on the effect of mass distribution of a single-tether spherical point absorber

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 583-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fantai Meng ◽  
Benjamin Cazzolato ◽  
Ye Li ◽  
Boyin Ding ◽  
Natalia Sergiienko ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 223-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fantai Meng ◽  
Boyin Ding ◽  
Benjamin Cazzolato ◽  
Maziar Arjomandi

2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 1895-1908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fantai Meng ◽  
Ashkan Rafiee ◽  
Boyin Ding ◽  
Benjamin Cazzolato ◽  
Maziar Arjomandi

Author(s):  
S. Golladay

The theory of multiple scattering has been worked out by Groves and comparisons have been made between predicted and observed signals for thick specimens observed in a STEM under conditions where phase contrast effects are unimportant. Independent measurements of the collection efficiencies of the two STEM detectors, calculations of the ratio σe/σi = R, where σe, σi are the total cross sections for elastic and inelastic scattering respectively, and a model of the unknown mass distribution are needed for these comparisons. In this paper an extension of this work will be described which allows the determination of the required efficiencies, R, and the unknown mass distribution from the data without additional measurements or models. Essential to the analysis is the fact that in a STEM two or more signal measurements can be made simultaneously at each image point.


1964 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Shepherd ◽  
Robert Goldstein ◽  
Benjamin Rosenblüt

Two separate studies investigated race and sex differences in normal auditory sensitivity. Study I measured thresholds at 500, 1000, and 2000 cps of 23 white men, 26 white women, 21 negro men, and 24 negro women using the method of limits. In Study II thresholds of 10 white men, 10 white women, 10 negro men, and 10 negro women were measured at 1000 cps using four different stimulus conditions and the method of adjustment by means of Bekesy audiometry. Results indicated that the white men and women in Study I heard significantly better than their negro counterparts at 1000 and 2000 cps. There were no significant differences between the average thresholds measured at 1000 cps of the white and negro men in Study II. White women produced better auditory thresholds with three stimulus conditions and significantly more sensitive thresholds with the slow pulsed stimulus than did the negro women in Study II.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 269-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.E. Campusano ◽  
E.S. Cypriano ◽  
L. Jr. Sodré ◽  
J.-P. Kneib

2006 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. E. Blue ◽  
S. V. Weber ◽  
D. T. Woods ◽  
M. J. Bono ◽  
S. N. Dixit ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 90-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia S. Pavlova ◽  
Andrey Е. Shastitko

The article deals with the problem of determining market boundaries for antitrust law enforcement in the field of telecommunications. An empirical approach has been proposed for determining the product boundaries of the market in the area of mass distribution of messages, taking into account the comparative characteristics of the types and methods of notification (informing) of end users; the possibilities of switching from one way of informing to another, including the evolution of such opportunities under the influence of technological changes; switching between different notification methods. Based on the use of surveys of customers of sending SMS messages, it is shown that the product boundaries should include not only sending messages via SMS, but also e-mail, instant messengers, Push notifications and voice information. The paper illustrates the possibilities of applying the method of critical loss analysis to determining the boundaries of markets based on a mixture of surveys and economic modeling.


2017 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 231-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barham S. Mahmood ◽  
Jagar Ali ◽  
Shirzad B. Nazhat ◽  
David Devlin

AIAA Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 308-314
Author(s):  
G. Greschik ◽  
M. Mikulas ◽  
A. Palisoc ◽  
C. Cassapakis ◽  
G. Veal
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document