Structural change, modernization, total factor productivity, and natural resources sustainability: An assessment with quantile and non-quantile estimators

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 102433
Author(s):  
Emrah Koçak ◽  
Seyit Önderol ◽  
Kamran Khan
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zerayehu Sime Eshete ◽  
Peter Kiko Kimuyu

Purpose – The Ethiopian economy is characterized by erratic and poor performance with negative growth rates, seven times over the period 1981-2010. This trapped per capita income at 358 USD in 2010 staying far away from middle-income country status. A lot of unsolved debates regarding perpetual growth, structural change and sectoral allocation of resource emerged overtime. The purpose of this paper is to examine the alternative effects of induced sectoral total factor productivity and makes comparisons of various sectoral growth options. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses a recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium model based on neoclassical-structuralist thought. It also calibrates coefficients that capture the impacts of openness, imported capital and liberalization on sectoral total factor productivity growth using a model of vector auto-regressive with exogenous variables. Findings – Future economic growth rate is expected to grow at a declining trend and to be dominated by the service sector. If it keeps growing on the current path it will expose the economy to a severe structural change burden problem. Openness induced agricultural total factor productivity highly improves the welfare of households while imported capital goods induced industrial total factor productivity is also better in fostering structural change of the economy. The broad-based growth option that combines the induced total factor productivity of all sectors also enables the economy to achieve more sustainable growth, rapid structural change and welfare gain at the same time. Originality/value – There are intensive and charged debates regarding alternative sectoral growth options. However, the debate does not derive from a rigorous analysis and holistic economy-wide approach. It is rather affiliated with politics. Therefore, the paper is original and investigates these issues meticulously.


Author(s):  
Germán H. González ◽  
Valentina N. Viego

AbstractThe paper proposes an interpretation of the «Argentine failure» based on development accounting and econometrical approaches frequently used in the current cross-country income differentials literature. The main results are as follows: the development process of Canada — in term ofper capitaGDP –– moved away from that of Argentina around 1918, but there was a structural change in the determinants of aggregate productivity around 1935 that led Argentina to take a diverging path. Recovery — thanks to improved aggregate productivity –– was not possible after 1940. The results support the idea that Argentina fell into a «staple trap», while Canada embarked on a successful path due to the adjacency and political proximity with a larger and complementary economy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 360-370
Author(s):  
Sharmistha Nag ◽  
Debarpita Roy ◽  
Laxmi Joshi ◽  
P. C. Parida ◽  
Hari K. Nagarajan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document