scholarly journals Childhood trauma and prodromal symptoms among individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis

2009 ◽  
Vol 108 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 176-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy L. Thompson ◽  
Meredith Kelly ◽  
David Kimhy ◽  
Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman ◽  
Shamir Khan ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. S89-S90
Author(s):  
Neus Barrantes-Vidal ◽  
Tecelli Domínguez-Martínez ◽  
Paula Cristobal ◽  
Tamara Sheinbaum ◽  
Thomas R. Kwapil ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Tikka ◽  
Sinikka Luutonen ◽  
Tuula Ilonen ◽  
Lauri Tuominen ◽  
Mika Kotimäki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. S347
Author(s):  
Floor J. van der Meer ◽  
Eva Veithorst ◽  
Carin J. Meijer ◽  
Marise W. Machielsen ◽  
Paolo Fusar-Poli ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. DeVylder ◽  
S. Ben-David ◽  
S. A. Schobel ◽  
D. Kimhy ◽  
D. Malaspina ◽  
...  

BackgroundIncreased sensitivity and exposure to stress are associated with psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia and its risk states, but little is known about the co-evolution of stress sensitivity and exposure with positive and other symptoms in a clinical high-risk (CHR) cohort.MethodA combined cross-sectional and longitudinal design was used to examine the associations over time of stress sensitivity and exposure (i.e. life events) with ‘prodromal’ symptoms in a cohort of 65 CHR patients assessed quarterly for up to 4 years, and at baseline in 24 healthy controls similar in age and gender.ResultsImpaired stress tolerance was greater in patients, in whom it was associated over time with positive and negative symptoms, in addition to depression, anxiety and poor function. By contrast, life events were comparable in patients and controls, and bore no association with symptoms. In this treated cohort, there was a trajectory of improvement in stress tolerance, symptoms and function over time.ConclusionsImpaired stress tolerance was associated with a wide range of ‘prodromal’ symptoms, consistent with it being a core feature of the psychosis risk state. Self-reported life events were not relevant as a correlate of clinical status. As in other treated CHR cohorts, most patients improved over time across symptom domains.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (32) ◽  
pp. 5036-5044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floor J. van der Meer ◽  
Eva Velthorst ◽  
Carin J. Meijer ◽  
Marise W.J. Machielsen ◽  
Lieuwe de Haan

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S207-S208
Author(s):  
Skylar Kelsven ◽  
Jean M Addington ◽  
Carrie E Bearden ◽  
Tyrone D Cannon ◽  
Barbara Cornblatt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
T. Velikonja ◽  
E. Velthorst ◽  
J. Zinberg ◽  
T. D. Cannon ◽  
B. A. Cornblatt ◽  
...  

Abstract Evidence suggests that early trauma may have a negative effect on cognitive functioning in individuals with psychosis, yet the relationship between childhood trauma and cognition among those at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis remains unexplored. Our sample consisted of 626 CHR children and 279 healthy controls who were recruited as part of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study 2. Childhood trauma up to the age of 16 (psychological, physical, and sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and bullying) was assessed by using the Childhood Trauma and Abuse Scale. Multiple domains of cognition were measured at baseline and at the time of psychosis conversion, using standardized assessments. In the CHR group, there was a trend for better performance in individuals who reported a history of multiple types of childhood trauma compared with those with no/one type of trauma (Cohen d = 0.16). A history of multiple trauma types was not associated with greater cognitive change in CHR converters over time. Our findings tentatively suggest there may be different mechanisms that lead to CHR states. Individuals who are at clinical high risk who have experienced multiple types of childhood trauma may have more typically developing premorbid cognitive functioning than those who reported minimal trauma do. Further research is needed to unravel the complexity of factors underlying the development of at-risk states.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Addington ◽  
Lisa Tran

Background: The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS) were developed to provide a theoretically coherent self-report assessment of schemata concerning self and others in psychosis. They provide a more useful measure of schemata about self and others than traditional measures of self-esteem. Aims: The aim of this study was to determine if these scales would be useful in a sample of individuals who are at clinical high risk of psychosis to help identify targets for intervention. Method: Thirty-eight individuals who are at high risk for psychosis were administered the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms, the Calgary Depression Scale, the Brief Core Schema Scales and the Young Schema Questionnaire–short version. Results: Results suggested that these scales are appropriate for this population and that negative evaluations of the self and others were significantly associated with attenuated psychotic symptoms and, in particular, suspiciousness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document