scholarly journals Six months functional response to early psychosis intervention program best predicts outcome after three years

2021 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
Philippe Golay ◽  
Julie Ramain ◽  
Raoul Jenni ◽  
Paul Klauser ◽  
Nadir Mebdouhi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 55-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Edwards ◽  
Ross Norman ◽  
Paul Kurdyak ◽  
Arlene G. MacDougall ◽  
Lena Palaniyappan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S585-S585
Author(s):  
G. Rivera Arroyo

The problemLess than half of the more than 250 adolescents and young adults who are estimated to experience a first episode of psychosis in the city of Santa Cruz each year are ever diagnosed and receive treatment.Of those patients who are eventually diagnosed, the average duration of their symptoms of psychosis prior to receiving treatment is estimated to be over 2 years.The opportunityMultiple psychosocial variables, such as the reaction of patients and their families to symptoms of psychosis, which play a vital role in determining long-term outcomes, demonstrate their highest degree of flexibility during the period of early psychosis. Psychological, social and evidence-based pharmacological interventions undertaken during this time frame can have a profound impact on the life-course of an individual with psychosis.Our solutionWe propose to establish a pilot early psychosis intervention program that will provide age appropriate biopsychosocial treatment and support for 15–25 years old with first episode psychosis and their families in Santa Cruz. This will improve short and long-term outcomes for those with psychosis, increase speed of recovery, decrease the need for hospitalization, reduce family disruption and decrease rates of relapse.By utilizing a mobile, multidisciplinary treatment team that emphasizes the roles of trained case managers focused on providing intensive individual and family support in the home, this program will provide culturally appropriate care that will leverage contributions from a limited supply of psychiatrists and shift dependence away from a fragmented medical system.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S216-S216
Author(s):  
Crystal Morris ◽  
Elham Sadeh ◽  
Greg McMillan ◽  
Sharman Robertson

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S139-S139
Author(s):  
Sara Camporesi ◽  
Ines Khadimallah ◽  
Margot Fournier ◽  
Philippe Golay ◽  
Lijing Xin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pharmacological, neurochemical and electrophysiological studies provide compelling evidence that N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction is a pathologic feature of schizophrenia (SZ). GWAS studies highlighted risk genes such as Serine Racemase (SRR), which synthesizes D-Serine (D-Ser), the co-agonist of glycine site at NMDARs, and Serine Hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1) which synthesizes L-Serine (L-Ser), the substrate of SRR. Around 30% of patients do not respond to dopamine modulation and are considered to suffer from treatment resistant SZ (TRS). While the exact cause of TRS remains unclear, multiple lines of evidence suggest the involvement of a dysregulation of the Glutamate (Glu) neurotransmission. To test the hypothesis whether Glu system dysregulation mediated by NMDAR hypofunction is an underlying mechanism of TRS, we investigate the Glu and D-Ser pathways in TRS and treatment responder (RESP) early psychosis patients (EPP). Methods From a total of 621 EPP aged 18 to 35, included in the TIPP (early Intervention Program in Lausanne, Baumann & al., 2013), 225 EPP were classified as TRS (n=33) or RESP (n=192) according to the strict Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) criteria (Howes & al., 2017), with compliance ascertained by antipsychotic plasma levels. A matched healthy control (HC) group (N=114) was also recruited (DIGS criteria). No patient was taking clozapine at baseline. Clinical data was collected over a 3-year period. At baseline, following systems were assessed: 1) D-Ser pathway: plasmatic D-Ser, L-Ser and Glycine by HPLC (Hashimoto & al., 2016), protein levels of SRR and SHMT1 by ELISA; 2) Glu pathway: Glu and glutamine in plasma (HPLC) and prefrontal cortex (magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Xin & al., 2016). Results D-Ser pathway: in TRS, SRR levels were decreased by 56% as compared to RESP. Interestingly, we observed a positive correlation between plasma levels of D-Ser (SRR metabolite) and L-Ser (SRR substrate) in the TRS (r= 0.58; p =0.0015) but not in the RESP group, suggesting that SRR dysregulation might be a limiting factor in TRS patients. Moreover, in TRS patients, SHMT1 levels were decreased by 15% as compared to RESP, with a positive correlation between the substrate and metabolite of SHMT1, glycine and L-Ser (r =0.48; p =0.011). Dysregulation of SHMT1 might thus be a limiting factor in the TRS group. As compared to HC, L-Ser and D-Ser were significantly increased in patients (p <0.001 for L-Ser, p =0.0001 for D-Ser). However, no difference was observed in D-Ser, L-Ser and glycine in TRS as compared to RESP, although L-Ser tended to be higher in male TRS patients (p =0.06). Glu pathway: comparing TRS with RESP patients, plasma Glu levels were increased in the TRS group (p <0.0001), whereas they were higher in both patient groups compared to HC (p <0.0001). Interestingly, plasma and brain Glu levels showed a negative correlation in EPP, mostly driven by RESP (r = -0.42; p =0.035), a correlation which was absent in HC. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): at baseline, TRS and RESP displayed the same range of GAF. After a 3-year follow-up, TRS patients had poorer functioning as compared to RESP group (p <0.0001). Discussion Taken together, our results suggest that the TRS group, in which the levels of SRR and SHMT1 were lower and Glu plasma levels were higher, display a different regulation of the synthesis, degradation and/or accumulation of D-Ser and Glu as compared to the RESP group. However, replication in larger groups is needed. Moreover, our findings highlighted a dysregulation of D-Ser and Glu pathways in TRS patients in their early phase of psychosis. On the clinical side, our results confirm the significantly poorer functioning outcome in TRS patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-92
Author(s):  
David J. VanDyke ◽  
Tammy Zimmerman ◽  
Tammy Vanrooy ◽  
Melissa Milanovic ◽  
Christopher R. Bowie

A cognitive remediation group therapy was adapted to accommodate a participant with acquired blindness in an early psychosis intervention program. The modifications facilitated group inclusion and self-reported positive outcomes. This case highlights the need to consider accessibility during treatment design and transitioning therapies from research settings into clinical environments.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane H. Fredrikson ◽  
Heidi N. Boyda ◽  
Lurdes Tse ◽  
Zachary Whitney ◽  
Mark A. Pattison ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document