Nitrate sources and processes in the surface water of a tropical reservoir by stable isotopes and mixing model

2020 ◽  
Vol 700 ◽  
pp. 134517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Widad Fadhullah ◽  
Nur Syahirah Yaccob ◽  
M.I. Syakir ◽  
Syahidah Akmal Muhammad ◽  
Fu-Jun Yue ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongmei Xue ◽  
Bernard De Baets ◽  
Oswald Van Cleemput ◽  
Carmel Hennessy ◽  
Michael Berglund ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhuan Cui ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Shuang Hao

AbstractNitrate (NO3−) pollution is a serious global problem, and the quantitative analysis of its sources contributions is essential for devising effective water-related environmental-protection policies. The Shengjin Lake basin, located in the middle to lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China was selected as the research area in our study. We first grouped 29 surface water samples and 33 groundwater samples using cluster analysis, and then analyzed potential nitrate sources for each dataset of δ15N–NO3− and δ18O–NO3− isotope values by applying a Bayesian isotope-mixing model. Our results show that the nitrogen pollution in the surface-ground water in the study area seriously exceeded to class V of the Environmental Quality Standard of Surface Water of China. The NO3− in surface water from the mid-upper reaches of the drainage basin mainly originates from soil nitrogen (SN) and chemical fertilizer (CF), with contribution rates of 48% and 32%, respectively, and the NO3− in downstream areas mainly originates from CF and manure and sewage (MS), with contribution rates of 48% and 33%, respectively. For the groundwater samples, NO3− mainly originates from MS, CF, and SN in the mid-upper reaches of the drainage basin and the northside of Dadukou near the Yangtze River, with contribution rates of 34%, 31%, and 29%, respectively, whereas NO3− in the lower reaches and the middle part of Dadukou mainly originates from MS, with a contribution rate of 83%. The nitrogen conversion of surface water in lakes and in the mid-upper reaches is mainly affected by water mixing, while the groundwater and surface water in the lower plains are mainly affected by denitrification. The method proposed in this study can expand the ideas for tracking nitrate pollution in areas with complex terrain, and the relevant conclusions can provide a theoretical basis for surface and groundwater pollution control in the hilly basin of Yangtze River.


2021 ◽  
Vol 778 ◽  
pp. 146297
Author(s):  
Yasheng Shi ◽  
Cai Li ◽  
Zanfang Jin ◽  
Yongqi Zhang ◽  
Jiazheng Xiao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingda Cao

<p>The spatiotemporal changes of nitrate in agricultural watersheds are of global concern. Although numerous studies have explained the source and transformation mechanism of nitrate in groundwater and surface water, the transformation mechanism in groundwater remains poorly understood because of different hydrogeological and climatic conditions. Based on a field investigation and sampling, this study revealed the sources and transformation mechanism of nitrogen in surface water and groundwater in a karst agricultural watershed by comprehensively using water chemistry data, isotope components, and a Bayesian model (simmr). The results indicated that:1)Local agricultural activities have controlled the changes of δ<sup>15</sup>N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, δ<sup>18</sup>O-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and δ<sup>15</sup>N-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in groundwater. The difference is that the concentration of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> is significantly affected by rainfall. However, the contribution of rainfall to groundwater NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> is relatively small (<9%), indicating that there is a dual influence mechanism of leaching in the watershed that controls the concentration of groundwater NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, while agricultural activities control its isotope changes;2)The study observed that after fertilization, due to the influence of ammonia volatilization and nitrification, δ<sup>15</sup>N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, δ<sup>18</sup>O-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> in groundwater showed a simultaneous decrease, while δ<sup>15</sup>N-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> showed an increasing trend, which may be due to the result of incomplete nitration of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> in the vadose zone;3)According to the calculation results of the simmr model, in the two main fertilization periods in October 2018 and April 2019, the contribution of chemical fertilizers to groundwater NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>reached the peak value(65% and 69%), which is in line with the seasonal variations of δ<sup>15</sup>N-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, δ<sup>18</sup>O-NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>and δ<sup>15</sup>N-NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>;4)The surface water in the watershed is mainly supplied by groundwater, and the contribution of chemical fertilizers to surface water NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> is generally higher than that of groundwater. This may be caused by the drainage of rice fields containing chemical fertilizers into the river.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document