scholarly journals A systematic review of the neural correlates of multisensory integration in schizophrenia

2022 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 100219
Author(s):  
Cornelia Gröhn ◽  
Elin Norgren ◽  
Lars Eriksson
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Tang ◽  
Xueli Wang ◽  
Xing Peng ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractInhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when focusing on both visual and auditory modalities. Utilising the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique we explored the possible neural correlates with the behaviour IOR difference between visual and audiovisual targets. The behavioural results revealed that the visual IOR was larger than the audiovisual IOR. The ERP results showed that the visual IOR effect was generated from the P1 and N2 components, while the audiovisual IOR effect was derived only from the P3 component. Multisensory integration (MSI) of audiovisual targets occurred on the P1, N1 and P3 components, which may offset the reduced perceptual processing due to audiovisual IOR. The results of early and late differences in the neural processing of the visual IOR and audiovisual IOR imply that the two target types may have different inhibitory orientation mechanisms.


2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 706-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela K Mayes ◽  
Sheena Reilly ◽  
Angela T Morgan

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Freitas ◽  
Enrica Manzato ◽  
Alessandra Burini ◽  
Margot J. Taylor ◽  
Jason P. Lerch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 250-264
Author(s):  
Brendan Hallam ◽  
Justin Chan ◽  
Sergi Gonzalez Costafreda ◽  
Rohan Bhome ◽  
Jonathan Huntley

Author(s):  
Alix L. de Dieuleveult ◽  
Petra C. Siemonsma ◽  
Jan B. F. van Erp ◽  
Anne-Marie Brouwer

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 687-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariana M. Chao ◽  
James Loughead ◽  
Zayna M. Bakizada ◽  
Christina M. Hopkins ◽  
Allan Geliebter ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lukas Novak ◽  
Klara Malinakova ◽  
Petr Mikoska ◽  
Jitse P. van Dijk ◽  
Peter Tavel

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1964-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen J. Stekelenburg ◽  
Jean Vroomen

A question that has emerged over recent years is whether audiovisual (AV) speech perception is a special case of multi-sensory perception. Electrophysiological (ERP) studies have found that auditory neural activity (N1 component of the ERP) induced by speech is suppressed and speeded up when a speech sound is accompanied by concordant lip movements. In Experiment 1, we show that this AV interaction is not speech-specific. Ecologically valid nonspeech AV events (actions performed by an actor such as handclapping) were associated with a similar speeding-up and suppression of auditory N1 amplitude as AV speech (syllables). Experiment 2 demonstrated that these AV interactions were not influenced by whether A and V were congruent or incongruent. In Experiment 3 we show that the AV interaction on N1 was absent when there was no anticipatory visual motion, indicating that the AV interaction only occurred when visual anticipatory motion preceded the sound. These results demonstrate that the visually induced speeding-up and suppression of auditory N1 amplitude reflect multisensory integrative mechanisms of AV events that crucially depend on whether vision predicts when the sound occurs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document