Golimumab in real-life settings: 2 Years drug survival and predictors of clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florenzo Iannone ◽  
Leonardo Santo ◽  
Maria Grazia Anelli ◽  
Romano Bucci ◽  
Angelo Semeraro ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayara Costa de Camargo ◽  
Bruna Cipriano Almeida Barros ◽  
Izabela Fulone ◽  
Marcus Tolentino Silva ◽  
Miriam Sanches do Nascimento Silveira ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1731-1731
Author(s):  
S. G. Werner ◽  
M. Vlachou ◽  
H. E. Langer ◽  
R. Chatelain

Background:In early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) a window of opportunity (WoO) is well established since its first proposal in 2002 (1). ERA patients achieved a better clinical outcome when DMARD therapy was initiated within the first 12-16 weeks after start of symptoms (disease duration (Xd) (2). To the best of our knowledge, comparable data are missing for early psoriatic arthritis (EPsA), even though the benefit of tight control is known in EPsA (3,4). In contrast to ERA early PsA is usually defined as Xd <24months (3,4).Objectives:To study in a setting of routine rheumatologic care if a WoO like in ERA also can be observed in EPsA comparable to ERA.Methods:n=90 consecutive outpatients with definite PsA were recruited in this retrospective longitudinal cohort study with the following inclusion criteria: DMARD- and steroid-naïve at the first time of visit in our outpatient clinic (t0), minimum follow-up of 3 years, classification as very early psoriatic arthritis (VEPsA, Xd≤3 months, n=30), late early psoriatic arthritis (LEPsA, > 3 Xd ≤ 12 months, n=30) and late psoriatic arthritis (LAPsA, Xd > 36 months, n=30). Standardized assessments had been performed at regular intervals of 3 months within the framework of routine rheumatologic care. Outcome at 3 years (t36) was analyzed within groups and between groups (DAS28, Physician Global Assessment (PhG), HAQ, fatigue, morning stiffness).Results:Cohorts did not differ between gender and age (mean age 54 years). There was no significant difference in DAS28, HAQ, PhG and morning stiffness at t0. Fatigue at t0 differed between cohort 1 and 3 significantly (p<0.03). In all cohorts DAS28 and PhG have been decreased at t36 significantly (minimal p< 0.006). In comparison to VEPsA LEPsA showed a significant difference in DAS28 (p<0.04) and PhG (p<0.05), but not in morning stiffness and fatigue. Highly significant differences between VEPsA and LAPsA were observed for DAS28 (p <0.007), morning stiffness (p < 0.001), PhG (p<0.05) and fatigue (p < 0.006) at t36.Conclusion:Significant and relevant differences between the outcomes at 3 years of patients with VEPsA, LEPsA and LAPsA could be identified in this retrospective pilot study. Particularly the highly significant difference between VEPsA and LAPsA (<3 months vs. >36months) is remarkable. The data suggest a window of opportunity also in patients with EPsA. With a time interval of Xd≤12 this window seems to be longer than in ERA. Further studies with higher number of patients were needed to confirm our findings from this real life setting.References:[1]O´Dell JR Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis Early: A Window of Opportunity? Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:283–285[2]Nell VPK, Machold KP, Eberl G, Stamm TA, Uffmann M, Smolen JS Rheumatology 2004 43:906-914[3]Coates LC, Moverley AR, McParland Let al. Effect of tight control of inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): a UK multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet2015,386:2489–98.[4]Coates LC, Mahmood F, Freeston J, Emery P, Conaghan PG, Helliwell PS Long-term follow-up of patients in the TIght COntrol of inflammation in early Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) trial Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019 kez369Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Soubrier ◽  
Peggy Bele-Philippe ◽  
Bernard Cortet ◽  
Nassima Ramdane-Sebbane ◽  
Marie-Astrid Bacle-Boutry ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1614.1-1615
Author(s):  
G. L. Fonti ◽  
M. S. Chimenti ◽  
A. D’antonio ◽  
M. Teoli ◽  
F. Caso ◽  
...  

Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease associated with psoriasis (PsO). Overexpression of inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α plays a key role in the pathogenic mechanisms. Golimumab (GLM) is a fully human monoclonal antibody IgG1k neutralizing TNF-α approved for PsA and PsO, but effectiveness evaluation in real life remains a crucial issue.Objectives:In a real-life setting, to determine the survival rate of GLM (drug survival) at 48 months in the global population, in different clinical settings, and the effectiveness of GLM in improving joint symptoms and cutaneous manifestations in patients affected by moderate to severe PsA with cutaneous involvement.Methods:We collected retrospectively from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019 data from 105 patients affected by PsA, according to the Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, who started treatment with GLM. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and had a diagnosis of PsA > 6 months, the presence of peripheral arthritis (at least one active joint) and active PsO. Relevant anamnestic, clinical, biochemical data and biological treatment line were collected at baseline (T0) and after 6 (T6), 12 (T12), 24 (T24) and 48 (T48) months of GLM treatment. Comparisons between baseline and 48 months continuous variables were performed using a paired t-test or a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples. The drug survival rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Drug survival rates were read from the Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Differences in drug survival between groups were analyzed using a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, by stratifying for sex, BMI, smoking habit and line of treatment. A p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Results:Peripheral arthritis was present in 67 (63.8%) cases, axial disease in 37 (35.3%), enthesitis and PsO as prominent manifestations in 82 (78%) and 84 (80%) patients respectively. Erosive disease was present in 38 (36.2%) of patients at baseline. The most frequent comorbidities were MetS described in 20 (19%) patients and cardiovascular disease described in 33 (31.4%) patients, probably due to the high incidence of smokers (33 (31.4%) of patients) and to the elevate BMI score (27.1±6.0). At 48 months, the 42% (44 of 105) (figure 1A) of the patients have discontinued therapy; the most frequent reason was insufficient response/loss of efficacy (30 patients (28.6%) out of 105). Unexpectedly, no statistical significant difference emerged according to gender (p=0.652), BMI (p=0.655), smoking habit (p=0.466) and line of treatment (p=0.208) (figure 1B-E). Finally, the effectiveness of GLM in improving joint symptoms and cutaneous manifestations was confirmed once again, with a statistical significant improvement at 48 months in clinical (BASDAI p<0.0001; PASI p<0.01; DAPSA p<0.0001) and biochemical (CRP<0.05) data.Conclusion:This multicentric study revealed a high drug persistence of GLM in real-life patients, although the presence of comorbidities. Unlike what is known in literature, our study population presented no differences in terms of clinical response and efficacy between male and female, smokers and no-smokers, obese and health-weight patients, different line of treatment. On the other hand, efficacy and safety of GLM has been demonstrated once again also in real-life treatments.References:No references.Disclosure of Interests:giulia lavinia fonti: None declared, Maria Sole Chimenti: None declared, Arianna D’Antonio: None declared, miriam teoli: None declared, Francesco Caso: None declared, Luisa Costa: None declared, marco tasso: None declared, Augusta Ortolan: None declared, Mariagrazia Lorenzin: None declared, Paola Conigliaro: None declared, paola triggianese: None declared, Raffaele Scarpa: None declared, Roberto Perricone: None declared, Roberta Ramonda Speakers bureau: Novartis, Celgene, Janssen, Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Bhushan ◽  
Susan Lester ◽  
Liz Briggs ◽  
Raif Hijjawi ◽  
E. Michael Shanahan ◽  
...  

Aims: To determine real-life biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) retention rates in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), explore reasons for switching and to compare results to previously published data.Methods: Time-to-event analysis for mean treatment duration (estimated as the Restricted Mean Survival Time), b/tsDMARD failure, and b/tsDMARDs switching was performed for 230 patients (n = 147 RA, 46 PsA, 37 AS) who commenced their first b/tsDMARD between 2008 and 2018. Patients were managed in a dedicated “biologics” clinic in a tertiary hospital; the choice of b/tsDMARD was clinician driven based on medical factors and patient preferences. The effect of covariates on switching risk was analysed by a conditional risk-set Cox proportional-hazards model. Treatment retention data was compared to a historical analysis (2002–2008).Results: The proportions remaining on treatment (retention) were similar, throughout follow-up, for the first, second and third b/tsDMARDs across all patients (p = 0.46). When compared to RA patients, the risk of b/tsDMARD failure was halved in PsA patients [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.50], but no different in AS patients (HR = 1.0). The respective restricted mean (95%CI) treatment durations, estimated at 5 years of follow-up, were 3.1 (2.9, 3.4), 4.1 (3.7, 4.6), and 3.3 (2.8, 3.9) years, for RA, PsA, and AS, respectively. Age, gender, disease duration, smoking status and the use of concomitant csDMARDS were not associated with the risk of bDMARD failure. The most common reasons for switching in the first and subsequent years were secondary (n = 62) and primary (n = 35) failure. Comparison with historical data indicated no substantive differences in switching of the first biologic for RA and PsA.Conclusion: Similar retention rates of the second and third compared to the first b/tsDMARD in RA, PsA, and AS support a strategy of differential b/tsDMARDs use informed by patient presentation. Despite greater availability of b/tsDMARDs with differing mechanisms of action, retention rates of the first b/tsDMARD remain similar to previous years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document