scholarly journals SAT0307 Impact of the modified rheumatic disease comorbidity index(MRDCI) on drug survival of first line anti-tnfΑ drugs in patents affected with psoriatic arthritis in real life setting

Author(s):  
M. Fornaro ◽  
V. Venerito ◽  
L. Cantarini ◽  
M.G. Anelli ◽  
F. Cacciapaglia ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Maria Sole Chimenti ◽  
Paola Conigliaro ◽  
Francesco Caso ◽  
Luisa Costa ◽  
Augusta Ortolan ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To determine the effectiveness of golimumab (GLM) in improving joint, periarticular structures and cutaneous manifestations in patients with moderate to severe psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with cutaneous psoriasis in different real-life clinical settings and 48-month drug survival. Methods Clinical and laboratory records were collected from PsA patients treated with GLM at baseline (T0) and after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of treatment. Comparisons were performed using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon test. Drug survival rates were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Data from 105 patients were collected. PsO occurred in 80% of patients and enthesitis in 78%, peripheral and axial arthritis in 63.8% and 35.3%, respectively, while erosions in 36.2%. The main comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (31.4%) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) (19%). A statistically significant improvement in articular and cutaneous psoriasis was registered at T48 of GLM-therapy in clinical (DAPSA p < 0.0001; PASI p < 0.01; BASDAI p < 0.0001) and laboratory (CRP < 0.05) indexes. Gender (p = 0.652), BMI (p = 0.655), smoking habit (p = 0.466), and line of treatment (p = 0.208) did not affect treatment efficacy nor persistence. At T48, 42% of patients discontinued GLM: the most frequent reason was an insufficient response or loss of efficacy (28.6%). Conclusion A 48-month GLM high drug persistence of PsA patients was observed in real-life, in patients presenting high disease activity, elevated prevalence of comorbidities, and more than one line of treatment at baseline. Patients’ characteristics as gender, smoke, BMI, different lines of treatment, and concomitant methotrexate treatment affected treatment persistence, making GLM effective and safe in moderate-severe PsA in a long-term real-life setting. Key Points• Golimumab was effective in psoriatic arthritis, including both musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations. • Golimumab effectiveness and drug survival were not affected by comorbidities and patient-related characteristics. • The 4-year drug survival curves confirm the efficacy and safety of golimumab in psoriatic arthritis patients in a real-life setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1633.1-1633
Author(s):  
D. Cici ◽  
C. Rotondo ◽  
A. Corrado ◽  
S. Berardi ◽  
N. Mansueto ◽  
...  

Background:Occasional findings of anti-citrullinated-protein-antibodies (ACPA) and anti-nuclear-antibodies (ANA) were rarely described in literature on Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and on Spondyloarthritis (SpA) in general. How these autoimmune dysregulations can affect the course of them is not yet understood.Objectives:The aim of our study is to evaluate if the presence of ACPA and ANA can determine different disease subsets and influence the DMARDs monotherapy (methotrexate) drug survival (DSM) and b-DMARDs multi-failure patients (MF).Methods:We conducted a retrospective study on patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Spondyloarthritis that fulfilled the ASAS and CASPAR criteria. Patients with diagnosis of connective tissue disease and rheumatoid arthritis and patients ≤ 18 years old were excluded from the study. For each patient, the following variables were considered: age, ACPA, ANA, time between arthritis onset and start of DMARDs (start-time), DSM, switch to b-DMARDs (sw-bDMARDs), arthritis subset (oligoarticular (OA), polyarticular (PA), enthesitis (EA), axial involvement (AI)), number of comorbidities (NC), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).Results:150 patients (55% with PsA and 45% with another SpA) were included in the study. No differences were found in age, ANA rate, ACPA rate, start-time, OA, PA, EA, AI, NC and CCI between the PsA and SpA groups.In the whole group of patients, the ACPA+ subjects(11%) had a significant increase of NC (2.47 ± 1.5 vs 1.6 ± 1.4, p=0.035), a trend to higher CCI, to switch to b-DMARDs, and to be MF compared to those without ACPA. In the same group, the ANA+ patients (12%) showed shorter DSM (233.5 wk ± 45.9 vs 548.0 wk ± 56.8, p=0.362) with similar trend in each subgroup (PsA and SpA).In SpA group, the ACPA+ patients(6,3%) had a trend to shorter DSM (269.0 weeks ± 125vs 603.96 wk± 92.8, p=0.492),to higher sw-bDMARDs, and to be MF, higher NC and CCI compared to those without ACPA. No differences in clinical subset (OA, PA, EA, AI) were observed. In the same group the ANA+ patients had significant higher rate of PA (100% vs 65%, p=0.026) rather than OA (0% vs 35%, p=0.025). No significant differences were found in NC, CCI, MF.In the PsA group, ACPA+ patients showed a trend to develop PA and EA subsets, shorter DSM (187.5 wk ± 48.7 vs 299.6 wk ± 31.4, p=0.415), higher rate to sw-bDMARDs and to be MF. The ANA+ PsA patients had higher trend to develop PA and AI subsets rather than OA and EA. All ANA+ patients were MF (100% vs 42%, p=0.046).Conclusion:The ACPA and ANA positivity in PsA and SpA patients could be suggestive of more severe clinical disease manifestation, higher frequency of comorbidities and lower predicted 10-year survival (CCI). Moreover, this autoimmune dysregulation could be associated with worse drug survival in monotherapy with methotrexate and higher chance to be MF. Therefore, they can be taken into account for clinical management of these patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Author(s):  
Stefania Nicola ◽  
Silvia Gallo Cassarino ◽  
Giovanni Rolla ◽  
Giada Geronazzo ◽  
Monica Fornero ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Naja ◽  
Liliana R Santos ◽  
Muhammad Shipa ◽  
Greenwood Mandy ◽  
Madhura Castelino

Abstract Background TNFi are the most used first line of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in PsA. In primary loss of response (PLR) to TNFi, there is no current evidence that directs the choice of second line bDMARDs. Our aim in this work was to compare drug survival for those who switched to a second TNFi versus alternative agents in real life. Methods Data was analysed retrospectively from a cohort of 400 PsA patients followed through from 2002-2019. Statistical analysis was carried out with descriptive statistics and t-test analysis using SPSS version 22. Results Out of 400 patients, 220 (55.0%) were started on bDMARD treatment. Of these 220, 212 (96.5%) were started on TNFi as initial therapy. PLR was seen in 42 of these patients (19.8%). The median drug survival of initial TNFi therapy was 7.1 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6 - 53.4 months). Of the 42 patients with PLR: 32 (76.2%) were switched to a second TNFi; 6 (14.3%) were switched to ustekinumab and 4 (9.5%) were switched to secukinumab. 21 of the 32 patients switched to a second TNFi were subsequently switched onto a third biologic due to treatment failure (65.6%). The median drug survival of the second TNFi in this group was 7.7 months (IQR 3.0 - 26.3 months). 3 out of the 6 (50%) patients who were switched to ustekinumab were then subsequently switched, this was due to primary inefficacy in 66.7% and adverse events in 33.3%. The median drug survival of ustekinumab in this group was 10.0 months (IQR 0.0 - 16.0 months). All 4 patients switched to secukinumab continue on this treatment with no drop outs, giving a median drug survival 12.3 months (IQR 6.5 - 19.5 months). Conclusion Our data suggests that patients with PLR to TNFi in PsA who switched mode of action to IL-17 inhibitor appeared to have better drug survival than subsequent TNFi or IL-12/23 inhibitors. Exploring the clinical biomarkers for those with successful switch to non-TNFi bDMARD in a larger cohort would help with targeting the most appropriate individuals and early disease control. Disclosures M. Naja None. L. R. Santos None. M. Shipa None. G. Mandy None. M. Castelino None.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayara Costa de Camargo ◽  
Bruna Cipriano Almeida Barros ◽  
Izabela Fulone ◽  
Marcus Tolentino Silva ◽  
Miriam Sanches do Nascimento Silveira ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 2232-2239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katia Cannita ◽  
Stefania Paradisi ◽  
Valentina Cocciolone ◽  
Alberto Bafile ◽  
Lucia Rinaldi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document