Estimation of immediate and 7-day clinical prognostic indicators for ewe and lamb survival in the UK following vaginal delivery and caesarean section at a single veterinary practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 106511
Author(s):  
E.L. Hawkins ◽  
S. McDonnell ◽  
J.W. Angell
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Veterinary Practice ◽  
Lamb Survival ◽  
The Uk

Breech Presentation: Vaginal Delivery or Caesarean Section?

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Tomescu Cezar Laurentiu ◽  
Rodica Sîrbu ◽  
Emin Cadar ◽  
Brezeanu Dragos ◽  
Aneta Tomescu
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Population Sample ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Current Paper ◽  
Clinical Hospital ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Number Of Patients

The incidence of breech presentation is approximately 3,97%. Breech presentation is considered as being “borderline eutocic” and it requires carefully monitoring both the foetus and the mother. The aim of the current paper is to evaluate the preffered method of delivery in case of breech presentation. The paper presents a retrospective study performed in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Departments of the County Emergency Clinical Hospital “Sf. Apostol Andrei” in Constanta, during a period of 5 years (2010-2014). The methods of birth were analyzed for a lot of 1104 patients with breech presentation with ages ranging between 16 and 44 years old. The total number of patients who gave birth through vaginal delivery was of 139 patients, amounting to 12.59% of the total population sample. The number of patients that gave birth through C-section was 965, which amounts to 87.4% of the total population sample. Birth through C-section is preferred by both obstetricians and patients alike, due to the fact that vaginal delivery is associated with a higher foetal risk in breech presentation.

scholarly journals A comparative evaluation of post placental intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) insertion between normal delivery and caesarean section

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3826
Author(s):  
Sharmistha Sarkar ◽  
Dhruba Prasad Paul ◽  
Jayanta Ray
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Contraceptive Device ◽  
Government Medical College ◽  
Expulsion Rate ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Placental

Background: Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes are related to pregnancies spaced too closely together. Objective of present study was to compare the expulsion rate and complications between post placental IUCD insertion between caesarean section and vaginal delivery.Methods: This study was a prospective comparative study conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at Agartala Government Medical College over 1.5 Years (January 2016-June2017) All cases at term pregnancy delivering by caesarean section and vaginal delivery were divided into two different groups. Sample size of 105 in each group. Subjects recruited from-obstetrics OPD and casualty of Agartala Government Medical College (AGMC) and GB Pant Hospital expulsion rate and complications. Comparative evaluation of Expulsion rate and complications following post placental IUCD insertion between caesarean section and vaginal delivery at the end of six months, one year and one and half year.Results: There was no significant difference in either complications between the two groups (P value-.913) or outcomes (p value-.035). Expulsion rate 18.2% following vaginal delivery compared to those with intracaesarean insertion i.e 3.8%.Conclusions: The complications associated with postplacental Intrauterine device insertion is insignificant, still the awareness, acceptance and continuation are very low. Therefore Information, education Communication activity by the field workers must be enhanced to overcome this knowledge gap.

scholarly journals Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous cesarean Section

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jha
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Previous Caesarean Section ◽  
Cephalopelvic Disproportion ◽  
Main Indication ◽  
Assisted Delivery ◽  
Vacuum Delivery

Background: The main aim of this study is to determine the maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy among women with one previous caesarean section at term in relation to vaginal delivery, post partum complication, neonatal complication like low Apgar score, fetal weight and admission in special baby unit. Methods: This is a prospective and descriptive study done in a sample size of 100. Inclusion criteria were term pregnancy, single live fetus with cephalic presentation with one previous caesarean section. During study period total number of obstetric admissions was 3546 and 115 cases were admitted with previous one caesarean section. Result: Out of 100 cases, 31 cases had vaginal delivery and 69 cases had caesarean section. Among 31 vaginal deliveries, 24 cases had spontaneous vaginal delivery and 7 had assisted delivery with vacuum, main indication of vacuum delivery was to cut short the second stage of labor that was in 5(71.43%) cases. Among 69 caesarean section cases, 51 had emergency caesarean section and 18 had elective caesarean section and cephalopelvic disproportion was the main indication in both the groups. Most common complication was scar dehiscence and postpartum hemorrhage. There were two still births in each group and one minute APGAR score was slightly better in caesarean section. Conclusions: Patients with previous caesarean section are at high risk of repeat emergency or elective caesarean section. About one in three patients with previous caesarean section delivered vaginally. In the present study postpartum hemorrhage was the commonest complication, which was found in caesarean section, and only  one puerperal pyrexia was seen in case of vaginal delivery. Key words: Cephalopelvic disproportion, Premature rupture of membrane, Septicemia, Vacuum delivery   DOI: 10.3126/jnhrc.v7i1.2275 Journal of Nepal Health Research Council Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009 April 25-28

A STUDY OF POSTPARTUM INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE INSERTIONS IN CAESAREAN SECTIONS AND FOLLOWING VAGINAL DELIVERIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Shweta Pathak ◽  
Manaswita Samanta ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Contraceptive Device ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Intrauterine Contraceptive

Aim: To study clinical outcomes of immediate postpartum IUCD insertion and to compare immediate postpartum IUCD insertion as a factor of route of insertion (caesarean vs. vaginal). Material and methods: This prospective study was conducted in a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, Nadia. Duration of the study was one and half years [ 15 months inclusion, 3 months follow up]. Total 100 cases are included [50 vaginal and 50 caesarean]. Women who were attending or referred to OPD or ER of Dept. of Obst and Gynae, College of medicine and JNM Hospital and delivering either vaginally or by caesarean section, have received counseling for postoperative contraception and have consented to PPIUCD insertion Result:It was found that in Caesarean, 26(52.0%) patients had bleeding P/V 6 weeks. In Vaiginal, 28(56.0%) patients had bleeding P/V 6 weeks. Association of bleeding P/V 6 weeks vs. group was not statistically signicant (p=0.61968). In Caesarean, 11(22.0%) patients had bleeding P/V 3 weeks. In Vaiginal, 13(26.0%) patients had bleeding P/V 3 weeks. Association of bleeding P/V 3 weeks vs. group was not statistically signicant (p=0.6395). Conclusion:Infection was not statistically signicant in two groups at 6 week and 3 month.Missing thread was signicantly higher caesarean delivery compared to vaginal delivery.It was also found that refusal/ continuation was more common in vaginal delivery compared to caesarean delivery, which was not statistically signicant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document