P-49 Percentile curves of changes in excess weight loss and body mass index after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a mexican population

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-389
Author(s):  
Hugo Sánchez ◽  
Rocío Durán ◽  
Florencia Vargas ◽  
Vianey Anduaga ◽  
Maureen Mosti ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Mahmoudieh ◽  
Behrouz Keleidari ◽  
Naser Afshin ◽  
Masoud Sayadi Shahraki ◽  
Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri ◽  
...  

Introduction. Obesity is among the newest health matters that human beings are struggling with. Length of bypassed intestine is important in achievement of most weight loss and least nutritional and absorptive disorders. This study has aimed to assess short-term metabolic and nutritional effects of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) with a loop bypass length of 180 centimeters (cm) and compare these factors among patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40–45 and 45–50 kilograms per square meter (kg/m2). Methods. 25 patients were put in group 1 (BMI = 40–45 kg/m2) and 25 patients in group 2 (BMI = 45–50 kg/m2). Patients’ BMI, postoperative weight, excess weight loss, and laboratory tests including fasting blood sugar (FBS), lipid profile, serum iron (Fe), ferritin, total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), 25-OH vitamin D, vitamin B12, liver function tests, and albumin were recorded preoperatively and within 3- and 6-month follow-up. Results. Weight loss and BMI reduction was significantly more in patients with higher BMI level (P=0.007), and excess weight loss was higher in patients with lower preoperative BMI level (P=0.007). Six-month follow-up showed statistically significant reduction in total cholesterol, total triglyceride, Fe, and vitamin B12 among patients with higher BMI level (P value <0.05). Conclusion. Based on this study, 180-cm intestinal bypassed length works for patients with a BMI level of 40–45 and 45–50 kg/m2, according to their significant decrease in weight, BMI, and improving glycolipid profile.


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (12) ◽  
pp. 490-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Mühlig ◽  
Miriam Remy ◽  
Rolf Holle ◽  
André Scherag ◽  
Martin Wabitsch ◽  
...  

Zusammenfassung Einleitung Soziale Benachteiligung stellt eine Behandlungsbarriere für Jugendliche mit (extremer) Adipositas dar. Mit der Implementierung einer Spezialambulanz in Kooperation mit fünf Job-Centern sollte geprüft werden, ob arbeitslose Jugendliche mit Adipositas Interesse an einer Behandlung ihrer Adipositas haben und welche Teilnahmeraten sie in einem mehrstufigen Behandlungsprogramm aufweisen. Material und Methoden Jugendliche (15,0–24,9 Jahre) mit einem Body-Mass-Index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 erhielten das Angebot zur Beratung bzgl. Behandlungsmöglichkeiten der Adipositas im Job-Center. Interessierte Jugendliche wurden nach einer psychologischen Diagnostik in ein multimodales Behandlungsprogramm (6 Sitzungen) aufgenommen. Bei Interesse und bewiesener Adhärenz (Teilnahme an ≥5 Sitzungen) folgte ein Informationskurs (4 Sitzungen) und eine Indikationsprüfung für eine adipositaschirurgische Maßnahme. Ergebnisse Von 2012–2017 wurden 83 Jugendliche (im Mittel 21,1 Jahre, BMI 48,1 kg/m2, BMI 35,0–39,9 kg/m2: N=7, ≥ 40 kg/m2: N=71) eingeschlossen. 34 bewiesen ihre Adhärenz (≥5/6 Sitzungen in der multimodalen Adipositasintervention), 20 interessierten sich für einen adipositaschirurgischen Eingriff. Bisher wurden 11 Jugendliche operiert mit einer mittleren BMI-Reduktion von 14,3 kg/m2 3–36 Monate nach der Operation („Excess Weight Loss“ 27,3%) im Vergleich zu 3,8 kg/m2 6–48 Monate nach Behandlungsbeginn bei den nicht-operierten Jugendlichen. 13 Teilnehmer wurden auf dem ersten Arbeitsmarkt integriert. Diskussion Einige arbeitslose Jugendliche nahmen das Behandlungsangebot gut an und zeigten eine positive gesundheitliche und berufliche Entwicklung im Verlauf ihrer Teilnahme. Schlussfolgerung Die Implementierung einer Spezialambulanz für arbeitslose Jugendliche mit Adipositas in deutschen Job-Centern erweist sich als eine erfolgreiche Strategie, um diese oft unbehandelte Hochrisikogruppe zu charakterisieren und den individuellen Behandlungsbedarf zu ermitteln. Dieser Befund muss an einer größeren Stichprobe im Langzeitverlauf bestätigt werden.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1041-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipe M. Cunha ◽  
Joana Oliveira ◽  
John Preto ◽  
Ana Saavedra ◽  
Maria M. Costa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482199198
Author(s):  
Imad El Moussaoui ◽  
Etienne Van Vyve ◽  
Hubert Johanet ◽  
André Dabrowski ◽  
Arnaud Piquard ◽  
...  

Background Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in the world. Our purpose was to evaluate the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), resolution of obesity-related comorbidities after SG, and identify predictive factors of weight loss failure. Methods A prospective cohort study of adults who underwent SG during 2014 in 7 Belgian-French centers. Their demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analyzed statistically. Results Overall, 529 patients underwent SG, with a mean preoperative weight and body mass index (BMI) of 118.9 ± 19.9 kg and 42.9 ± 5.5 kg/m2, respectively. Body mass index significantly decreased to 32.2 kg/m2 at 5 years ( P < .001). The mean %EWL was 63.6% at 5 years. A significant reduction in dyslipidemia (28.0%-18.2%), obstructive sleep apnea (OSAS) (34.6%-25.1%), and arterial hypertension (HTN) (30.4%-21.5%) was observed after 5 years, but not for diabetes and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). At multivariate analysis, age >50 years old, BMI >50 kg/m2, and previous laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) remained independent predictors of weight loss failure. Conclusions Five years after SG, weight loss was satisfactory; the reduction of comorbidities was significant for dyslipidemia, OSAS, and HTN, but not diabetes and GERD. Age >50 years old, BMI >50 kg/m2, and previous LAGB were independent predictors of weight loss failure.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 43-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Leite FARIA ◽  
Orlando Pereira FARIA ◽  
Mariane de Almeida CARDEAL

BACKGROUND: After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to avoid rapid gastric emptying, dumping syndrome and regained weight due to possible dilation of the gastric pouch, was proposed to place a ring around the gastric pouch. AIM: To compare weight loss, consumption of macronutrients and the frequency of vomiting among patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without the placement of a constriction ring around the pouch. METHOD: A retrospective study, in which an analysis of medical records was carried out, collecting data of two groups of patients: those who underwent the operation with the placement of a constriction ring (Ring Group) and those who underwent without the placement of a ring (No-Ring Group). The food intake data were analyzed using three 24-hour recalls collected randomly in postoperative nutritional accompaniment. Data on the percentage of excess weight loss and the occurrence of vomiting were collected using the weight corresponding to the most recent report at the time of data collection. RESULTS: Medical records of 60 patients were analyzed: 30 from the Ring Group (women: 80%) and 30 from the No-Ring Group (women: 87%). The average time since the Ring Group underwent the operation was 88±17.50 months, and for the No-Ring Group 51±15.3 months. The percentage of excess weight loss did not differ between the groups. The consumption of protein (g), protein/kg of weight, %protein and fiber (g) were higher in the No-Ring Group. The consumption of lipids (g) was statistically higher in the Ring Group. The percentage of patients who never reported any occurrence was statistically higher in the No-Ring Group (80%vs.46%). The percentage who frequently reported the occurrence was statistically higher in the Ring Group (25%vs.0%). CONCLUSION: The placement of a ring seems to have no advantages in weight loss, favoring a lower intake of protein and fiber and a higher incidence of vomiting, factors that have definite influence in the health of the bariatric patient.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e0167577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Billodre Luiz ◽  
César Luis de Souza Brito ◽  
Letícia Manoel Debon ◽  
Lívia Nora Brandalise ◽  
Juliana Tainski de Azevedo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document