In Situ Placement of High-Dose rhBMP-2 within Spine Tumors Slows Tumor Growth and Decreases Onset to Paralysis in a Rat Model of Metastatic Breast Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. S3-S4
Author(s):  
Camilo Molina ◽  
Rachel Sarabia-Estrada ◽  
Ziya Gokaslan ◽  
Jean-Paul Wolinsky ◽  
Ali Bydon ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Cristofanilli ◽  
Frankie Ann Holmes ◽  
Laura Esparza ◽  
Vicente Valero ◽  
Aman U. Buzdar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
SANJAY MISHRA ◽  
Manish Charan ◽  
Rajni Kant Shukla ◽  
Pranay Agarwal ◽  
Swati Misri ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Metastasis is the major cause of mortality in breast cancer; however, the molecular mechanisms remain elusive. In our previous study, we demonstrated that S100A7/RAGE mediates breast cancer growth and metastasis by recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages. However, the downstream S100A7-mediated inflammatory oncogenic signaling cascade that enhances breast tumor growth and metastasis by generating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (iTME) has not been studied. In this present study, we aimed to investigate the S100A7 and cPLA2 cross-talk in enhancing tumor growth and metastasis through enhancing the iTME.Methods: Human breast cancer tissue and plasma samples were used to analyze the expression of S100A7, cPLA2, and PGE2 titer. S100A7-overexpressing or downregulated human metastatic breast cancer cells were used to evaluate the S100A7-mediated downstream signaling mechanisms. Bi-transgenic mS100a7a15 overexpression, TNBC C3(1)/Tag transgenic, and humanized patient-derived xenograft mouse models and cPLA2 inhibitor (AACOCF3) were used to investigate the role of S100A7/cPLA2/PGE2 signaling in tumor growth and metastasis. Additionally, CODEX, a highly advanced multiplexed imaging was employed to delineate the effect of S100A7/cPLA2 inhibition on the recruitment of various immune cells.Results: S100A7 and cPLA2 are highly expressed and positively correlated in malignant breast cancer patients. S100A7/RAGE upregulates cPLA2/PGE2 axis in aggressive breast cancer cells. Furthermore, S100A7 is positively correlated with PGE2 in breast cancer patients. Moreover, cPLA2 pharmacological inhibition suppressed S100A7-mediated tumor growth and metastasis in multiple pre-clinical models. Mechanistically, S100A7-mediated activation of cPLA2 enhances the recruitment of immunosuppressive myeloid cells by increasing PGE2 to fuel breast cancer growth and its secondary spread. We revealed that cPLA2 inhibitor mitigates S100A7-mediated breast tumorigenicity by suppressing the iTME. Furthermore, CODEX imaging data showed that cPLA2 inhibition increased the infiltration of CD4+/CD8+ T cells in the TME. Analysis of metastatic breast cancer samples revealed a positive correlation between S100A7/cPLA2 with CD163+ tumor-associated M2-macrophages.Conclusions: Our study shows that cross-talk between S100A7 and cPLA2 plays an important role in enhancing breast tumor growth and metastasis by generating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and reducing infiltration of T cells. Furthermore, S100A7 could be used as a novel non-invasive prognostic marker and cPLA2 inhibitors as promising drugs against S100A7-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Schmid ◽  
Walter Schippinger ◽  
Thorsten Nitsch ◽  
Gerdt Huebner ◽  
Volker Heilmann ◽  
...  

Purpose The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in metastatic breast cancer remains controversial. Trials with late intensification HDCT have failed to show an advantage in overall survival. This study was initiated to compare up-front tandem HDCT and standard combination therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to standard combination therapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) or double HDCT with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. HDCT was repeated after 6 weeks. Patients were stratified by menopausal and hormone-receptor status. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates. Results A total of 93 patients were enrolled onto the trial. Intent-to-treat CR rates for patients randomized to HDCT and AT were 12.5% and 11.1%, respectively (P = .84). Objective response rates were 66.7% for patients in the high-dose group and 64.4% for patients in the AT arm (P = .82). In an intent-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the two treatments in median time to progression (HDCT, 11.1 months; AT, 10.6 months; P = .67), duration of response (HDCT, 13.9 months; AT, 14.3 months; P = .98), and overall survival (HDCT, 26.9 months; AT, 23.4 months; P = .60). HDCT was associated with significantly more myelosuppression, infection, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea and vomiting, whereas patients treated with AT developed more neurotoxicity. Conclusion This trial failed to show a benefit for up-front tandem HDCT compared with standard combination therapy. HDCT was associated with more acute adverse effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document