P59. Chronic preoperative opioid use is associated with higher perioperative resource utilization and adverse outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. S174
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Sadiq ◽  
Faizal Kassam ◽  
Ariana Frederick ◽  
Fred Nicholls ◽  
Peter D. Lewkonia ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferran Pellisé ◽  
Miquel Serra-Burriel ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Sleiman Haddad ◽  
Michael P. Kelly ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEAdult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery has a high rate of major complications (MCs). Public information about adverse outcomes is currently limited to registry average estimates. The object of this study was to assess the incidence of adverse events after ASD surgery, and to develop and validate a prognostic tool for the time-to-event risk of MC, hospital readmission (RA), and unplanned reoperation (RO).METHODSTwo models per outcome, created with a random survival forest algorithm, were trained in an 80% random split and tested in the remaining 20%. Two independent prospective multicenter ASD databases, originating from the European continent and the United States, were queried, merged, and analyzed. ASD patients surgically treated by 57 surgeons at 23 sites in 5 countries in the period from 2008 to 2016 were included in the analysis.RESULTSThe final sample consisted of 1612 ASD patients: mean (standard deviation) age 56.7 (17.4) years, 76.6% women, 10.4 (4.3) fused vertebral levels, 55.1% of patients with pelvic fixation, 2047.9 observation-years. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that 12.1% of patients had at least one MC at 10 days after surgery; 21.5%, at 90 days; and 36%, at 2 years. Discrimination, measured as the concordance statistic, was up to 71.7% (95% CI 68%–75%) in the development sample for the postoperative complications model. Surgical invasiveness, age, magnitude of deformity, and frailty were the strongest predictors of MCs. Individual cumulative risk estimates at 2 years ranged from 3.9% to 74.1% for MCs, from 3.17% to 44.2% for RAs, and from 2.67% to 51.9% for ROs.CONCLUSIONSThe creation of accurate prognostic models for the occurrence and timing of MCs, RAs, and ROs following ASD surgery is possible. The presented variability in patient risk profiles alongside the discrimination and calibration of the models highlights the potential benefits of obtaining time-to-event risk estimates for patients and clinicians.


2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822096409
Author(s):  
Anthony M. Alvarado ◽  
Bryan A. Schatmeyer ◽  
Paul M. Arnold

Study Design: Review article. Objective: A review of the literature evaluating the cost-effectiveness of undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery and potential avenues for reducing costs. Methods: A review of the current literature and synthesis of data to provide an update on the cost effectiveness of undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery. Results: Compared with nonoperative management, operative management for adult spinal deformity is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and quality of life; however, it is associated with significant financial and resource use. Conclusion: Operative management for adult spinal deformity has been shown to be effective but is associated with significant cost and resource utilization. The optimal operative treatment is highly dependent on the patients’ symptomatology and is surgeon dependent. Maximizing preoperative surgical health and minimizing postoperative complications are key measures in reducing the cost and resource utilization of adult spinal deformity surgery. Future studies are needed to evaluate how to optimize the cost-effectiveness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-495
Author(s):  
Mark Ren ◽  
Barry R. Bryant ◽  
Andrew B. Harris ◽  
Khaled M. Kebaish ◽  
Lee H. Riley ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe objectives of the study were to determine, among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), the following: 1) how preoperative opioid use, dose, and duration of use are associated with long-term opioid use and dose; 2) how preoperative opioid use is associated with rates of postoperative use from 6 weeks to 2 years; and 3) how postoperative opioid use at 6 months and 1 year is associated with use at 2 years.METHODSUsing a single-center, longitudinally maintained registry, the authors identified 87 patients who underwent ASD surgery from 2013 to 2017. Fifty-nine patients reported preoperative opioid use (37 high-dose [≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents daily] and 22 low-dose use). The duration of preoperative use was long-term (≥ 6 months) for 44 patients and short-term for 15. The authors evaluated postoperative opioid use at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine associations of preoperative opioid use, dose, and duration with use at each time point (alpha = 0.05).RESULTSThe following preoperative factors were associated with opioid use 2 years postoperatively: any opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 14, 95% CI 2.5–82), high-dose use (aOR 7.3, 95% CI 1.1–48), and long-term use (aOR 17, 95% CI 2.2–123). All patients who reported high-dose opioid use at the 2-year follow-up examination had also reported preoperative opioid use. Preoperative high-dose use (aOR 247, 95% CI 5.8–10,546) but not long-term use (aOR 4.0, 95% CI 0.18–91) was associated with high-dose use at the 2-year follow-up visit. Compared with patients who reported no preoperative use, those who reported preoperative opioid use had higher rates of use at each postoperative time point (from 94% vs 62% at 6 weeks to 54% vs 7.1% at 2 years) (all p < 0.001). Opioid use at 2 years was independently associated with use at 1 year (aOR 33, 95% CI 6.8–261) but not at 6 months (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 0.95–24).CONCLUSIONSPatients’ preoperative opioid use, dose, and duration of use are associated with long-term use after ASD surgery, and a high preoperative dose is also associated with high-dose opioid use at the 2-year follow-up visit. Patients using opioids 1 year after ASD surgery may be at risk for long-term use.


Spine ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 941-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Glassman ◽  
Sigurd Berven ◽  
John Kostuik ◽  
John R. Dimar ◽  
William C. Horton ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S186
Author(s):  
Michael P. Kelly ◽  
Lawrence G. Lenke ◽  
Breton Line ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. S123-S124
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Harris ◽  
Brian J. Neuman ◽  
Alexandra Soroceanu ◽  
Richard A. Hostin ◽  
Themistocles S. Protopsaltis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. S125
Author(s):  
Mark Ren ◽  
Barry R. Bryant ◽  
Andrew B. Harris ◽  
Richard L. Skolasky ◽  
Khaled M. Kebaish ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. S129-S130
Author(s):  
Breton Line ◽  
Shay Bess ◽  
Samrat Yeramaneni ◽  
Richard A. Hostin ◽  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. S137
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Gum ◽  
Leah Y. Carreon ◽  
Mitsuru Yagi ◽  
Naobumi Hosogane ◽  
Kota Watanabe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document