Liver resection for liver metastases from nondigestive endocrine cancer: Extrahepatic disease burden defines outcome

1039 Background: Despite recent treatment improvements, the prognosis of BCLM is still poor. Hepatic resection (HR) has been associated with better outcome in selected patients, but its place in multimodality treatment of BCLM remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the outcome of a large cohort of patients selected for HR of BCLM and to define prognostic factors of survival, in a way to better define the place of surgery. Methods: A standardized questionnaire reviewing the main diagnostic and treatment modalities of primary tumor, liver metastases, response to medical therapies, type of surgical procedures, postoperative outcome, and survival following surgery, was sent to all contributing centers. Results: 460 patients treated with liver resection for BCLM from 1980 to 2000, were collected from 31 hepatobiliary surgery centers. Mean age was 51.8 years. Primary tumor, mainly adenocarcinoma, was treated by resection combined with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in most cases. Diagnosis of BCLM was made after an average of 54 months from the treatment of the primary tumor. BCLM were unique in 56% and associated to limited extrahepatic disease in 18.5% of patients. After initial treatment by systemic therapy (70% of patients), HR achieved a R0 resection in 82% of patients and was combined to extrahepatic resection for distant metastases in 9% of patients. Postoperative mortality (= 2 months) was 0.2%. Median survival was 45.4 months after HR, with an overall survival of 41% and 22% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Disease-free survival rates were 14% and 10%, respectively. Four predictive factors were independently associated to an unfavourable outcome: tumor progression on chemotherapy before surgery (p = 0.0006, RR = 2.9), disease-free interval < 12 months after treatment of the primary tumor (p = 0.0003, RR = 2.1), extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.0002, RR = 1.9) and R2 liver resection (p < 0.0001, RR = 3.0). Conclusions: Inclusion of HR in the multimodality treatment of BCLM is safe and associated with a hope of long term survival (22% at 10 years). Surgery should be discussed on a multidisciplinary basis, particularly when potentially radical, in patients well controlled by chemotherapy with a long disease-free interval, and in the absence of extrahepatic disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Liver resection for colorectal metastases.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.938 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 15 (3) ◽

pp. 938-946 ◽

Cited By ~ 837

Author(s):

Y Fong ◽

A M Cohen ◽

J G Fortner ◽

W E Enker ◽

A D Turnbull ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Survival Rate ◽

Liver Resection ◽

Mortality Rate ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Colorectal Metastases ◽

Extrahepatic Disease ◽

Disease Free Interval ◽

Multiple Tumors ◽

Free Interval ◽

Disease Free

PURPOSE More than 50,000 patients in the United States will present each year with liver metastases from colorectal cancers. The current study was performed to determine if liver resection for colorectal metastases is safe and effective and to evaluate predictors of outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data for 456 consecutive resections performed between July 1985 and December 1991 in a tertiary referral center were analyzed. RESULTS The perioperative mortality rate was 2.8%, with a mortality rate of 4.6% for resections that involved a lobectomy or more. The median hospital stay was 12 days and only 9% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The 5-year survival rate is 38%, with a median survival duration of 46 months. By univariate analysis, nodal status of the primary lesion, short disease-free interval before detection of liver metastases, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level greater than 200 ng/mL, multiple liver tumors, extrahepatic disease, large tumors, or positive resection margin was predictive of poorer outcome. Sex, age greater than 70 years, site of primary tumor, or perioperative transfusion was not predictive of outcome. By multivariate analysis, positive margin, size greater than 10 cm, disease-free interval less than 12 months, multiple tumors, and extrahepatic disease were independent predictors of poorer outcome. Short disease-free interval or multiple tumors were nevertheless associated with a 5-year survival rate greater than 24%. CONCLUSION Liver resection for colorectal metastases is safe and effective therapy and currently represents the only potentially curative therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. The only absolute contraindication to resection is extrahepatic disease. A randomized trial to examine efficacy of surgical resection cannot ethically be performed. Liver resection should be considered standard therapy for all fit patients with colorectal metastases isolated to the liver.

Download Full-text

Liver resection is beneficial for patients with colorectal liver metastases and extrahepatic disease

Annals of Translational Medicine ◽

10.21037/atm-20-4416 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (18) ◽

pp. 1122-1122

Author(s):

Hauke Lang

Keyword(s):

Liver Resection ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽

Extrahepatic Disease

Download Full-text

Liver Resections for Metastases from Intraabdominal Leiomyosarcoma

HPB Surgery ◽

10.1155/1999/67324 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. 261-264 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Antonio Nocchi Kalil ◽

Bianca De Lourdes Pereira ◽

Marcia Cristina Lima Brenner ◽

Luiz Pereira-Lima

Keyword(s):

Liver Resection ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Surgical Indication ◽

Extrahepatic Disease ◽

Term Survival ◽

Long Term Survival ◽

Liver Resections

This paper discusses liver resection for intraabdominal leiomyosarcoma metastases as a therapy for carefully selected patients. Of the 83 hepatectomies performed from 1992 to 1996, five were resections for liver metastases due to intraabdominal leiomyosarcoma, in 3 patients. The surgical indication was single liver metastases, without any evidence of extrahepatic disease. No mortality occurred during surgery and the longest survival was 38 months. We concluded that liver resection for leiomyosarcoma metastases can be performed, allowing a long term survival in an occasional patient.

Download Full-text

Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases

Perspectives in Surgery ◽

10.33699/pis.2019.98.10.399-403 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 98 (10) ◽

Keyword(s):

Radiofrequency Ablation ◽

Liver Resection ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Postoperative Mortality ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Female Ratio ◽

Liver Resections ◽

Multi Stage

Introduction: Radical liver resection is the only method for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, only 20–30% of patients with CLMs can be radically treated. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the possible methods of palliative treatment in such patients. Methods: RFA was performed in 381 patients with CLMs between 01 Jan 2001 and 31 Dec 2018. The mean age of the patients was 65.2±8.7 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Open laparotomy was done in 238 (62.5%) patients and the CT-navigated transcutaneous approach was used in 143 (37.5%) patients. CLMs <5 cm (usually <3 cm) in diameter were the indication for RFA. We used RFA as the only method in 334 (87.6%) patients; RFA in combination with resection was used in 36 (9.4%), and with multi-stage resection in 11 (3%) patients. We performed RFA in a solitary CLM in 170 (44.6%) patients, and in 2−5 CLMs in 211 (55.6%) patients. We performed computed tomography in each patient 48 hours after procedure. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. Complications were present in 4.8% of transcutaneous and in 14.2% of open procedures, respectively, in the 30-day postoperative period. One-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94.8, 66.8, 43.9 and 16.6%, respectively, in patients undergoing RFA, and 90.6, 69.1, 52.8 and 39.2%, respectively, in patients with liver resections. Disease free survival was 63.2, 30.1, 18.4 and 13.1%, respectively, in the same patients after RFA, and 71.1, 33.3, 22.8 and 15.5%, respectively, after liver resections. Conclusion: RFA is a palliative thermal ablation method, which is one of therapeutic options in patients with radically non-resectable CLMs. RFA is useful especially in a non-resectable, or resectable (but for the price of large liver resection) solitary CLM <3 cm in diameter and in CLM relapses. RFA is also part of multi-stage liver procedures.

Download Full-text