Quality of life in patients with upper GI malignancies managed by a strategy of chemoradiotherapy alone versus surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Lauren O'Connell ◽  
Mary Coleman ◽  
N. Kharyntiuk ◽  
Thomas N. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A239-A240
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Bolling-Sternevald ◽  
Rolf Carlsson ◽  
Claus Aalykke ◽  
Benedicte Wilson ◽  
Ola Junghard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Gi ◽  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1940-1940
Author(s):  
Joseph Pidala ◽  
Xiaoyu Chai ◽  
Brenda Kurland ◽  
Mukta Arora ◽  
Corey Cutler ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1940 Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant source of morbidity, mortality, impaired patient-reported quality of life (QOL), greater symptom burden, and prolonged duration of immune suppressive therapy following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). While available data support the adverse prognosis of overlap subtype of chronic GVHD, the relative importance of site of gastrointestinal (GI) and type of hepatic involvement is not known. Methods: We analyzed prospectively acquired observational cohort data to examine whether the site of GI involvement (esophageal, upper GI, lower GI) and type of hepatic laboratory test abnormality (bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (AP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation over the upper limit of normal based on study site-specific laboratory reference ranges) among chronic GVHD-affected patients are associated with overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM), symptoms (Lee Symptom Scale), and quality of life (QOL) per SF-36 and FACT-BMT instruments. Results: This analysis included 567 individual subjects with baseline and 1548 follow up visits. The majority were incident cases (59%), adults (98%), and predominantly White/Non-Hispanic. Median time from HCT to cohort enrollment was 11.9 months (range 3–294 months). Overall NIH chronic GVHD severity was mild in 10%, moderate in 52%, and severe in 38% at enrollment. Prior acute GVHD was noted in 66%, KPS < 80% in 17%, and platelet count at chronic GVHD onset of < 100 K/uL in 23%. At enrollment, GI involvement was seen in 40% (upper GI 20%, esophagus 16%, lower GI 13%), and liver involvement was seen in 52% (AP 38%, ALT 38%, bilirubin 10%). Time from transplant to cGVHD onset was not different for patients with or without GI involvement or hepatic involvement. In multivariate analysis utilizing data from enrollment visits only and adjusting for patient and transplant variables, lower GI involvement (HR 1.7, p=0.03) and elevated bilirubin (HR 2.36, p=0.001) were associated with OS; both were also associated with NRM. In multivariable analysis using all visits (time-dependent covariates), GI score greater than zero (HR 1.7, p=0.01) and elevated bilirubin (HR 3.7, p<0.001) were associated with OS; results were similar for NRM. Separate models were constructed to examine the relationship of severity of GI and hepatic involvement (0–3 severity score per NIH consensus) and mortality: Increasing lower GI severity at enrollment was significantly associated with non-relapse mortality, with progressively increasing HR for greater severity levels (lower GI score 2/3 vs. 0: HR 5.5, 95% CI 2.3–13.1, p = 0.0001). Increasing bilirubin was also associated with NRM (bilirubin score 2/3 vs. 0: HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3–8.4, p=0.01). A similar association was observed for bilirubin elevation and NRM in the time-dependent model (bilirubin 2/3 vs. 0: HR 8.9, 95% CI 3.3–24, p < 0.0001). When analyzing all visits, any esophageal involvement and GI score greater than zero were associated with both symptoms and QOL while elevated bilirubin was associated with QOL. We found no consistent evidence that upper GI involvement, AP, ALT, or NIH liver score add prognostic value for survival, overall symptom burden, or quality of life. Conclusion: These data support important differences in patient-reported outcomes according to GI and hepatic involvement among chronic GVHD affected patients, and identify those with elevated bilirubin or higher GI score at any time, or lower GI involvement at cohort enrollment, as patients at greater risk for mortality under current treatment approaches. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2010 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane R. Schubart ◽  
James Wise ◽  
Isabelle Deshaies ◽  
Eric T. Kimchi ◽  
Kevin F. Staveley-O'Carroll ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Edith A. Brutcher, RN, APRN-BC, AOCNP ◽  
Zhengjia Chen, PhD ◽  
Anqi Pan, MSPH Candidate ◽  
Tiffany Barrett, MS, RD, CSO, LD

2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Hawkey ◽  
Neville D. Yeomans ◽  
Roger Jones ◽  
James M. Scheiman ◽  
Goran Langstrom ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 64-65
Author(s):  
P M Miranda ◽  
G H Rueda ◽  
N Calo ◽  
C Seiler ◽  
Z Punthakee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) often suffer with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, such as abdominal pain, bloating, early satiety, nausea and vomiting. T1DM patients are at a higher risk to develop celiac disease, and those patient with both disorders benefit from a gluten-free diet (GFD). However, it is unknown whether GFD has any benefit in patients with T1DM without celiac disease who present with upper GI symptoms. Aims To investigate the role of GFD in the management of moderate to severe dyspeptic symptoms in non-celiac patients with T1DM. Methods We enrolled adult T1DM patients, in whom celiac disease was ruled out by serology and/or endoscopy, suffering with two or more of upper GI symptoms. The patients were instructed to undergo a strict GFD for a period of 1 month, under supervision of a dietitian. Glycemic levels were monitored by a continuous glucose monitoring device (CGM) for 2 weeks before, and for 2 weeks at the end of the GFD period. Upper GI symptoms, general quality of life, anxiety and depression were assessed using standardized questionnaires. Blood samples were collected to assess glycaemia (Hb1Ac) and lipid profiles. Scintigraphy and videofluoroscopy were used to assess gastric emptying. Results Seven patients finished the study so far. They reported a significant improvement in nausea (p&lt;0.05), sensation of fullness (p&lt;0.01), bloating (p&lt;0.01), feeling of excessive fullness after meals (p&lt;0.01) and having stomach visibly larger after meals (p&lt;0.01). 5 out of the 7 patients reported an improvement in general quality of life, based on PAGI-QOL (Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders – Quality of Life), and decreased anxiety levels (HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score). There was no significant change in mean glucose level, time in target, glucose variance and HbA1c levels after GFD. However, there was a trend for less time spent in hypoglycemia, namely in those patients who experienced frequent hypoglycemia prior to GFD. Overall, there was no change in serum lipid profile or gastric emptying. Conclusions One month of GFD improved dyspepsia-like symptoms, general quality of life and anxiety levels in T1D patients without concomitant celiac disease. GFD also improved the blood glucose management of patients with frequent hypoglycemia. Thus, this dietary intervention appears to improve upper GI symptoms in T1D patients but the results need to be replicated in a larger patient cohort. Funding Agencies CIHR


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Atuhani S. Burnett ◽  
Jack Mouhanna ◽  
Jose Ramirez-Garcialuna ◽  
Emma Lee ◽  
Julie Breau ◽  
...  

180 Background: Esophago-gastric cancers are aggressive malignancies requiring numerous investigations to plan complex multi-modal therapy. The path from initial diagnosis to treatment can be associated with a long delay. This delay and complex patient trajectory may impact quality of life. Given the poor prognosis and highly symptomatic nature of upper GI cancer, a clear and timely access to treatment of crucial importance. We sought to determine the impact of a newly implemented streamlined and structure interdisciplinary pathway for newly diagnosed esophageal and gastric cancer on access times to treatment and quality of life (QoL). Methods: A streamlined pathway for patients referred to a high volume Upper GI Cancer clinic was generated with input from physicians, nutritionists, specialized nurses, and social workers. New diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer from 2014-16 were enrolled in this program and consenting patients completed serial QoL questionnaires (ESAS) at baseline, pre-treatment, 1 month post treatment. Dysphagia (DS) was quantified on a 5 point scale. Time intervals (days) were evaluated at various points between diagnosis and start of treatment (diagnosis, CT imaging, first visit with upper GI program, start of treatment). Data presented as median(IQR), * p < 0.05. Results: Of the 251 patients with Upper GI cancer, 153 (61%) consented to participate including 140 esophageal/EGJ and 13 gastric cancer patients. Clinical stage distribution was 17.9% I, 30.7% II, 42.6% III, 8.7% IV. Of the 82 Esoph/EGJ patients with completed QoL questionnaires, 15 (18.3%) patients had severe dysphagia (DS = 3-4) and were prioritized for treatment. Patients with severe dysphagia had reduced time from index endoscopy to treatment (29 (16.3-39.3) vs 43 (32.8-68.0)days)* and first Upper GI clinic to treatment (15 (8.0-23.0) vs 25 (21.0-36.0)*. ESAS surveys showed increased QoL for both patients with and without dysphagia from baseline to pre-treatment indicating that simply entry into the streamlined program improved QoL. Conclusions: Structured interdisciplinary investigative and treatment programs for upper GI cancers can expedite time to treatment and improve QoL.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 2842
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Sadeghi ◽  
David Mockler ◽  
Emer M. Guinan ◽  
Juliette Hussey ◽  
Suzanne L. Doyle

Malnutrition and muscle wasting are associated with impaired physical functioning and quality of life in oncology patients. Patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are considered at high risk of malnutrition and impaired function. Due to continuous improvement in upper GI cancer survival rates, there has been an increased focus on multimodal interventions aimed at minimizing the adverse effects of cancer treatments and enhancing survivors’ quality of life. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined nutritional and exercise interventions in improving muscle wasting, physical functioning, and quality of life in patients with upper GI cancer. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINHAL. Of the 4780 identified articles, 148 were selected for full-text review, of which 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. Whilst reviewed studies showed promising effects of multimodal interventions on physical functioning, no significant differences in postoperative complications and hospital stay were observed. Limited available evidence showed conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of these interventions on preserving muscle mass and improving health-related quality of life. Further studies examining the impact of nutrition and exercise interventions on upper GI patient outcomes are required and would benefit from reporting a core outcome set.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document