Climate change concern and the desire to travel: How do I justify my flights?

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 282-290
Author(s):  
Áróra Árnadóttir ◽  
Michał Czepkiewicz ◽  
Jukka Heinonen
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle F. Lawson ◽  
Kathryn T. Stevenson ◽  
M. Nils Peterson ◽  
Sarah J. Carrier ◽  
Erin Seekamp ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 793-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory B. Lewis ◽  
Risa Palm ◽  
Bo Feng

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Dayrell ◽  
John Urry

This article examines the centrality of Brazil within the future of climate policy and politics. The state of the carbon sink of the Amazon rainforest has long been an iconic marker of the condition of the Earth. Brazil has been innovative in developing many non-carbon forms of energy generation and use and it has played a major role in international debates on global warming since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. We examine various ways in which climate change has come to be centrally important in Brazilian public opinion. Survey evidence shows that Brazilians are the most concerned about issues of climate change – with less climate change scepticism as compared with more ‘advanced’ societies. Through using techniques of corpus linguistics we examine how Brazilian media has engendered and stabilized such a high and striking level of climate change concern. We show that the media helped to fix a ‘climate change framing’ of recent often strange weather. The article analyses the newly constructed Brazilian Corpus on Climate Change, presenting data on a scale and reach that is unique in this area of research.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1946-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gazi Mahabubul Alam ◽  
Ferdous Ahmed ◽  
Abul Quasem Al-Amin ◽  
Che Hashim Hassan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ullrich K. H. Ecker ◽  
Lucy H. Butler ◽  
John Cook ◽  
Mark J. Hurlstone ◽  
Tim Kurz ◽  
...  

The COVID-19 pandemic has understandably dominated public discourse,crowding out other important issues such as climate change. Currently, if climate change enters the arena of public debate, it primarily does so in direct relation to the pandemic. In two experiments, we investigated (1) whether portraying the response to the COVID-19 threat as a “trial run” for future climate action would increase climate-change concern and mitigation support, and (2) whether portraying climate change as a concern that needs to take a “back seat” while focus lies on economic recovery would decrease climate-change concern and mitigation support. We found no support for the effectiveness of a trial-run frame in either experiment. In Experiment 1, we found that a back-seat frame reduced participants’ support for mitigative action. In Experiment 2, the back-seat framing reduced both climate-change concern and mitigation support; a combined inoculation and refutation was able to offset the drop in climate concern but not the reduction in mitigation support.


Author(s):  
Joshua J. Lawler ◽  
Julia Michalak

This chapter explores the relative uncertainty associated with popular approaches to conservation planning in the face of climate change. Concern about uncertainties inherent in climate-change projections and associated ecological impacts have led many in the conservation community to avoid climate modeling, and instead favor forecast-free approaches that involve increasing connectivity and protecting “nature’s stage” (geophysical settings) to produce climate-smart conservation plans. A comparison of each of these approaches reveals that the uncertainties associated with connectivity modeling and mapping geophysical settings can be as large, if not larger than, the uncertainties associated with climate-change projections. Whereas the uncertainties of climate forecasts are widely appreciated, the same cannot be said for the approaches that avoid climate forecasts. It is not the case that there is one best approach. The answer to uncertainty is to seek robust conservation plans that work regardless of which approach is taken.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
RENE X. VALDEZ ◽  
M. NILS PETERSON ◽  
KATHRYN T. STEVENSON

SUMMARYEngaging adolescents is critical to encouraging future climate change adaptation and mitigation behaviours. Adolescents are typically more receptive to climate change messages than adults, but educators and communicators need research-based strategies for optimizing engagement, including information about what factors are most influential in changing behaviours. To better understand how communication with teachers, friends and family, climate change knowledge and climate change concern predict climate change behaviour, we administered a survey to a random sample of middle school students in North Carolina, USA (n = 1371). We measured climate change behaviour with a multi-item scale asking respondents about energy conservation, alternative transportation and engagement with environmental issues. We found that climate change concern and discussing climate change with family and friends predicted climate change behaviour. We also found that students from urban, high socioeconomic status schools were more likely to engage in climate change behaviour than students in urban, low socioeconomic status schools or rural schools. These results suggest that education efforts should leverage communication with family and friends in programming designed to encourage climate change behaviour. Further, efforts to promote climate change behaviour among low socioeconomic status urban and rural adolescents may be warranted, but would benefit from further investigation into the ideological, physical and knowledge-based drivers of behaviour differences documented in this study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document