Are there any differences in the most frequently injected muscles in upper, lower and upper, and lower limbs, with regard to the treatment goal areas? An overview of the real-life clinical practice in a reference spasticity clinic

Toxicon ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S13-S14
Author(s):  
João Paulo Castro ◽  
Daniela Pinto ◽  
Melissa Gorayeb ◽  
Carolina Falcão ◽  
Jorge Jacinto
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Hawthorne ◽  
Adam Harvey

AbstractPoint-of-care assays offer a decentralised and fast solution to the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and provide benefits for patients, healthcare workers, healthcare facilities and other environments. This technology has to potential to prevent outbreaks, enable faster adoption of life-changing measures and improve hospitalar workflow. While reviews regarding the performance of those assays exist, a review focused on the real-life clinical performance and point-of-care feasibility of those platforms was missing. Therefore, the objective of this study is to help end users (clinicians, healthcare providers and organisations) to understand the real-life performance of point-of-care assays, aiding in their implementation in decentralised, true point-of-care facilities, or inside hospitals. 871 studies were screened in 3 major databases and 51 studies were included, evaluating 20 antigen tests and 10 nucleic-acid amplification platforms. We excluded studies that used processed samples, pre-selected populations, archived samples and laboratory-only evaluations and strongly favored prospective trial designs in our inclusion criteria. We also investigated package inserts, instructions for use, comments on published studies and manufacturers websites in order to assess feasibility of POC placement and additional information of relevance to the end user. Apart from sensitivity and specificity, we present information on time to results, hands-on time, kit storage, machine operating conditions and regulatory status. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review to systematically evaluate POC test performance in real-life clinical practice. We found the performance of tests in clinical practice to be markedly different from the manufacturers reported performance and laboratory-only evaluations in the majority of studies. Our findings may help in the decision-making process related to SARS-CoV-2 test in real-life clinical settings.Rationale for the reviewA review focused on the real-life clinical performance and point-of-care feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic platforms was missing, impairing the ability of individuals, healthcare providers and test providers to make informed decisions on the adoption of such platforms.Objective(s) or question(s) the review addressesThe objective of this study is to help clinicians, healthcare providers and organisations to understand the real-life performance of point-of-care assays, aiding in their implementation in decentralised, true point-of-care facilities or in complex hospitalar environments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. S529-S530
Author(s):  
G. Mattingly ◽  
H. Ren ◽  
M. Cronquist Christensen ◽  
K. Simonsen ◽  
L. Hammer-Helmich

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1003-1010
Author(s):  
S. Savic ◽  
L. Leeman ◽  
T. El‐Shanawany ◽  
R. Ellis ◽  
J.E. Gach ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ii45 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Buchler ◽  
Z. Bortlicek ◽  
K. Hejduk ◽  
B. Melichar ◽  
P. Pokorna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Natale ◽  
Alfiera Marsocci

<p>Generally in the clinical practice patients are more complex in comparison with those included in the clinical trials. In this article, we discuss three relevant items, which may implement the transferability of the clinical trial results in the real world. The observational studies have fewer restrictions on the number of patients included, due to more relaxed inclusion and exlusion criteria than in randomized clinical trials. The absence of randomization however may lead to potential for bias. The recurrent event analysis may extend the positive results of clinical trials regarding the reductions of the first primary endpoint event to total events, including those beyond the first event. This analysis is of great interest in the clinical practice, where recurrent events are common. Finally the reliability of subgroup analysis is discussed. Pre-specified subgroup analyses are more credible and valuable than <em>post-hoc</em> analyses.</p><p><strong>Riassunto</strong></p><p>Nella pratica clinica i pazienti sono generalmente più complessi rispetto alle popolazioni studiate nei trial clinici. Si rendono necessari pertanto strumenti di analisi che integrino i trial clinici. In questo articolo vengono esaminati alcuni punti di rilevante importanza nella definizione di una corretta applicabilità dei risultati dei trial clinici al mondo reale. Il primo punto riguarda il ruolo e i limiti degli studi osservazionali. Il secondo tratta delle analisi degli eventi ricorrenti, una modalità di analisi dei trial clinici che rende i risultati più aderenti alla vita reale, nella consapevolezza che limitare i dati di outcome al primo evento sia riduttivo rispetto alla necessità di stabilire che l’intervento studiato nel trial confermi la sua efficacia anche sugli eventi successivi al primo. Il terzo punto riguarda la controversa questione delle analisi per sottogruppi, uno strumento utile per generare ipotesi, ma discutibile quando impiegato per rimediare a trial con risultati negativi o estendere i risultati di trial positivi a sottopopolazioni particolari di pazienti. </p>


Author(s):  
Gherardo Mazziotti ◽  
Claudia Battista ◽  
Sabrina Chiloiro ◽  
Filippo Maffezzoni ◽  
Emanuele Ferrante ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina Kopeckova ◽  
Tomas Buchler ◽  
Zbynek Bortlicek ◽  
Karel Hejduk ◽  
Renata Chloupkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document