Approach of the Clinicians Practicing in Intensive Care Units to Brain Death Diagnosis and Training Expectations in Turkey: A Web-Based Survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 2916-2922
Author(s):  
Sibel Yilmaz Ferhatoglu ◽  
Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu ◽  
Alp Gurkan
2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marinella Marinoni ◽  
Fabiana Alari ◽  
Veronica Mastronardi ◽  
Adriano Peris ◽  
Paola Innocenti

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 59-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shari Simone ◽  
Carmel A. McComiskey ◽  
Brooke Andersen

As demand for nurse practitioners in all types of intensive care units continues to increase, ensuring successful integration of these nurses into adult and pediatric general and specialty intensive care units poses several challenges. Adding nurse practitioners requires strategic planning to define critical aspects of the care delivery model before the practitioners are hired, develop a comprehensive program for integrating and training these nurses, and create a plan for implementing the program. Key strategies to ensure successful integration include defining and implementing the role of nurse practitioners, providing options for orientation, and supporting and training novice nurse practitioners. Understanding the importance of appropriate role utilization, the depth of knowledge and skill expected of nurse practitioners working in intensive care units, the need for a comprehensive training program, and a commitment to continued professional development beyond orientation are necessary to fully realize the contributions of these nurses in critical care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. S118
Author(s):  
Bilgehan Kahveci ◽  
Kenan Topal ◽  
Cigdem Gereklioglu ◽  
Avsar Zerman ◽  
Sibel Tetiker

2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrícia M. Lago ◽  
Jefferson Piva ◽  
Pedro Celiny Garcia ◽  
Eduardo Troster ◽  
Albert Bousso ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Prashant Nasa ◽  
Ruchi Nasa ◽  
Aanchal Singh

The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has inundated critical care services globally. The intensive care units (ICUs) and critical care providers have been forefront of this pandemic, evolving continuously from experiences and emerging evidence. In this review, we discuss the key lessons from the ongoing wave of COVID-19 pandemic and preparations for a future surge or second wave. The model of sustainable critical care services should be based on 1) infrastructure development, 2) preparation and training of manpower, 3) implementing standard of care and infection control, 4) sustained supply-chain and finally, and 5) surge planning. 


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Devlin ◽  
Jeffrey J. Fong ◽  
Elizabeth P. Howard ◽  
Yoanna Skrobik ◽  
Nina McCoy ◽  
...  

Background Despite practice guidelines promoting delirium assessment in intensive care, few data exist regarding current delirium assessment practices among nurses and how these practices compare with those for sedation assessment. Objectives To identify current practices and perceptions of intensive care nurses regarding delirium assessment and to compare practices for assessing delirium with practices for assessing sedation. Methods A paper/Web-based survey was administered to 601 staff nurses working in 16 intensive care units at 5 acute care hospitals with sedation guidelines specifying delirium assessment in the Boston, Massachusetts area. Results Overall, 331 nurses (55%) responded. Only 3% ranked delirium as the most important condition to evaluate, compared with altered level of consciousness (44%), presence of pain (23%), or improper placement of an invasive device (21%). Delirium assessment was less common than sedation assessment (47% vs 98%, P < .001) and was more common among nurses who worked in medical intensive care units (55% vs 40%, P = .03) and at academic centers (53% vs 13%, P < .001). Preferred methods for assessing delirium included assessing ability to follow commands (78%), checking for agitation-related events (71%), the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (36%), the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (11%), and psychiatric consultation (9%). Barriers to assessment included intubation (38%), complexity of the tool for assessing delirium (34%), and sedation level (13%). Conclusions Practice and perceptions of delirium assessment vary widely among critical care nurses despite the presence of institutional sedation guidelines that promote delirium assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document