Controlling the surface potential of a dielectric target irradiated by an electron beam in medium vacuum

Vacuum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 187 ◽  
pp. 110120
Author(s):  
V.A. Burdovitsin ◽  
K.I. Karpov ◽  
E.M. Oks ◽  
D.B. Zolotukhin
Vacuum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V. Tyunkov ◽  
V.A. Burdovitsin ◽  
E.M. Oks ◽  
Yu.G. Yushkov ◽  
D.B. Zolotukhin

2020 ◽  
Vol 383 ◽  
pp. 125241 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V. Tyunkov ◽  
D.A. Golosov ◽  
D.B. Zolotukhin ◽  
A.V. Nikonenko ◽  
E.M. Oks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1890-1893 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Lindsay ◽  
J. W. Hemsky ◽  
D. C. Look

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Buijsse ◽  
Piet Trompenaars ◽  
Veli Altin ◽  
Radostin Danev ◽  
Robert M. Glaeser

ABSTRACTThe Volta Phase Plate (VPP) consists of a heated, thin film that is placed in the same plane as the focused diffraction pattern of an electron microscope. A change in surface potential develops at the point irradiated by the intense, unscattered electron beam, and this altered surface potential produces, in turn, a phase shift between the unscattered and scattered parts of the electron wave. While the VPP thus increases the image contrast for weak-phase objects at low spatial frequencies, we report here that it also leads to the loss of an increasing fraction of the signal at higher resolution. The approximately linear dependence (with increasing resolution) of this loss has been quantified at 200 kV and 300 kV, using evaporated-carbon films of different thicknesses as Volta phase plates. In all cases, the loss of signal remains almost independent of variation of the conditions and parameters that were tested. In spite of having done a number or additional, discovery-based experiments, the cause of this loss of signal remains unexplained at this point.


2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (11) ◽  
pp. 113303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yury G. Yushkov ◽  
Denis B. Zolotukhin ◽  
Efim M. Oks ◽  
Andrey V. Tyunkov

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 053512 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Zolotukhin ◽  
V. A. Burdovitsin ◽  
E. M. Oks ◽  
A. V. Tyunkov ◽  
Yu. G. Yushkov

2019 ◽  
Vol 358 ◽  
pp. 726-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.A. Burdovitsin ◽  
D.A. Golosov ◽  
E.M. Oks ◽  
A.V. Tyunkov ◽  
Yu.G. Yushkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
J. Liu ◽  
G. G. Hembree ◽  
J. A. Venable

When an insulator is bombarded by electrons a surface potential will build up if the total number of electrons entering the sample is not equal to that coming out. This potential can be positive or negative depending on the energy of the incident electrons and the target material. The effects of charging will limit, or at least perturb, the use of electron beam techniques for examining the surface properties of insulators. Various methods have been developed to avoid insulator charging. However none of these methods can be applied to high spatial resolution electron beam studies of clean insulator surfaces. At the electron beam energies typically used in STEM instruments the surface of bulk insulators will always acquire a negative potential. Secondary electron imaging (SEI) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) would be possible if the surface potential were stable under electron beam illumination and was small compared with the incident beam potential.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document