Valuing flexibilities in the design of urban water management systems

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (20) ◽  
pp. 7162-7174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinghan Deng ◽  
Michel-Alexandre Cardin ◽  
Vladan Babovic ◽  
Deepak Santhanakrishnan ◽  
Petra Schmitter ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 2595-2606 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.L. Spencer ◽  
I.G. Droppo ◽  
C. He ◽  
L. Grapentine ◽  
K. Exall

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Belmeziti ◽  
Frédéric Cherqui ◽  
Amélie Tourne ◽  
Damien Granger ◽  
Caty Werey ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blal Adem Esmail ◽  
Lina Suleiman

Sustainability concerns and multiple socio-environmental pressures have necessitated a shift towards Sustainable Urban Water Management (SUWM) systems. Viewing SUWM systems as sociotechnical, this paper departs from eight factors previously identified by transition research: Pressures, Context, Purposes, Actors, Instruments, Processes, Outputs, and Outcomes as a methodological framework for a structured review of 100 articles. The study seeks to analyze empirical cases of planning and implementing SUWM systems worldwide. A wide range of public actors—driven by social and environmental factors rather than by economic pressures—have initiated SUWM projects so as to locally fulfill defined social and environmental purposes. We provide evidence on the emergence of new actors, such as experts, users, and private developers, as well as on the diverse and innovative technical and societal instruments used to promote and implement SUWM systems. We also explore their contexts and institutional capacity to deal with pressures and to mobilize significant financial and human resources, which is in itself vital for the transition to SUWM. Planned or implemented SUWM outputs are divided into green (wet ponds, raingardens, and green roofs) and gray (rain barrels and porous pavements) measures. The outcomes of SUWM projects—in terms of societal and technical learning, and their institutional uptakes—are often implicit or lacking, which seemingly reduces the rate of desirable change.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 875-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Candelieri ◽  
Francesco Archetti ◽  
Enza Messina

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (0) ◽  
pp. 9781780402437-9781780402437 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Wolf ◽  
B. Morris ◽  
S. Burn

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 265-269
Author(s):  
Govert D. Geldof

In the practice of integrated water management we meet complexity, subjectivity and uncertainties. Uncertainties come into play when new urban water management techniques are applied. The art of a good design is not to reduce uncertainties as much as possible, but to find the middle course between cowardice and recklessness. This golden mean represents bravery. An interdisciplinary approach is needed to reach consensus. Calculating uncertainties by using Monte Carlo simulation results may be helpful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document