scholarly journals PanClassif: Improving pan cancer classification of single cell RNA-seq gene expression data using machine learning

Genomics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazi Ferdous Mahin ◽  
Md. Robiuddin ◽  
Mujahidul Islam ◽  
Shayed Ashraf ◽  
Farjana Yeasmin ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 2422-2439

Cancer classification is one of the main objectives for analyzing big biological datasets. Machine learning algorithms (MLAs) have been extensively used to accomplish this task. Several popular MLAs are available in the literature to classify new samples into normal or cancer populations. Nevertheless, most of them often yield lower accuracies in the presence of outliers, which leads to incorrect classification of samples. Hence, in this study, we present a robust approach for the efficient and precise classification of samples using noisy GEDs. We examine the performance of the proposed procedure in a comparison of the five popular traditional MLAs (SVM, LDA, KNN, Naïve Bayes, Random forest) using both simulated and real gene expression data analysis. We also considered several rates of outliers (10%, 20%, and 50%). The results obtained from simulated data confirm that the traditional MLAs produce better results through our proposed procedure in the presence of outliers using the proposed modified datasets. The further transcriptome analysis found the significant involvement of these extra features in cancer diseases. The results indicated the performance improvement of the traditional MLAs with our proposed procedure. Hence, we propose to apply the proposed procedure instead of the traditional procedure for cancer classification.


F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linh Nguyen ◽  
Cuong C Dang ◽  
Pedro J. Ballester

Background:Selected gene mutations are routinely used to guide the selection of cancer drugs for a given patient tumour. Large pharmacogenomic data sets were introduced to discover more of these single-gene markers of drug sensitivity. Very recently, machine learning regression has been used to investigate how well cancer cell line sensitivity to drugs is predicted depending on the type of molecular profile. The latter has revealed that gene expression data is the most predictive profile in the pan-cancer setting. However, no study to date has exploited GDSC data to systematically compare the performance of machine learning models based on multi-gene expression data against that of widely-used single-gene markers based on genomics data.Methods:Here we present this systematic comparison using Random Forest (RF) classifiers exploiting the expression levels of 13,321 genes and an average of 501 tested cell lines per drug. To account for time-dependent batch effects in IC50measurements, we employ independent test sets generated with more recent GDSC data than that used to train the predictors and show that this is a more realistic validation than K-fold cross-validation.Results and Discussion:Across 127 GDSC drugs, our results show that the single-gene markers unveiled by the MANOVA analysis tend to achieve higher precision than these RF-based multi-gene models, at the cost of generally having a poor recall (i.e. correctly detecting only a small part of the cell lines sensitive to the drug). Regarding overall classification performance, about two thirds of the drugs are better predicted by multi-gene RF classifiers. Among the drugs with the most predictive of these models, we found pyrimethamine, sunitinib and 17-AAG.Conclusions:We now know that this type of models can predictin vitrotumour response to these drugs. These models can thus be further investigated onin vivotumour models.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linh C. Nguyen ◽  
Cuong C. Dang ◽  
Pedro J. Ballester

AbstractSelected gene mutations are routinely used to guide the selection of cancer drugs for a given patient tumour. Large pharmacogenomic data sets were introduced to discover more of these single-gene markers of drug sensitivity. Very recently, machine learning regression has been used to investigate how well cancer cell line sensitivity to drugs is predicted depending on the type of molecular profile. The latter has revealed that gene expression data is the most predictive profile in the pan-cancer setting. However, no study to date has exploited GDSC data to systematically compare the performance of machine learning models based on multi-gene expression data against that of widely-used single-gene markers based on genomics data.Here we present this systematic comparison using Random Forest (RF) classifiers exploiting the expression levels of 13,321 genes and an average of 501 tested cell lines per drug. To account for time-dependent batch effects in IC50measurements, we employ independent test sets generated with more recent GDSC data than that used to train the predictors and show that this is a more realistic validation than K-fold cross-validation. Across 127 GDSC drugs, our results show that the single-gene markers unveiled by the MANOVA analysis tend to achieve higher precision than these RF-based multi-gene models, at the cost of generally having a poor recall (i.e. correctly detecting only a small part of the cell lines sensitive to the drug). Regarding overall classification performance, about two thirds of the drugs are better predicted by multi-gene RF classifiers. Among the drugs with the most predictive of these models, we found pyrimethamine, sunitinib and 17-AAG.


Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1466
Author(s):  
Aina Umairah Mazlan ◽  
Noor Azida Sahabudin ◽  
Muhammad Akmal Remli ◽  
Nor Syahidatul Nadiah Ismail ◽  
Mohd Saberi Mohamad ◽  
...  

Data-driven model with predictive ability are important to be used in medical and healthcare. However, the most challenging task in predictive modeling is to construct a prediction model, which can be addressed using machine learning (ML) methods. The methods are used to learn and trained the model using a gene expression dataset without being programmed explicitly. Due to the vast amount of gene expression data, this task becomes complex and time consuming. This paper provides a recent review on recent progress in ML and deep learning (DL) for cancer classification, which has received increasing attention in bioinformatics and computational biology. The development of cancer classification methods based on ML and DL is mostly focused on this review. Although many methods have been applied to the cancer classification problem, recent progress shows that most of the successful techniques are those based on supervised and DL methods. In addition, the sources of the healthcare dataset are also described. The development of many machine learning methods for insight analysis in cancer classification has brought a lot of improvement in healthcare. Currently, it seems that there is highly demanded further development of efficient classification methods to address the expansion of healthcare applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document