Assessment of Genetic Counseling Referrals and Testing for Patients At Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndromes

2016 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
E. Smith ◽  
R. Kline
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9698-9698 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. I. Palmero ◽  
M. Caleffi ◽  
F. R. Vargas ◽  
J. C. C. Rocha ◽  
R. Giugliani ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9698-9698
Author(s):  
E. I. Palmero ◽  
M. Caleffi ◽  
F. R. Vargas ◽  
J. C. C. Rocha ◽  
R. Giugliani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brian Szender ◽  
Jasmine Kaur ◽  
Katherine Clayback ◽  
Mollie L. Hutton ◽  
June Mikkelson ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of patients at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome to select the extent of genetic testing personally preferred and the impact of demographic factors on the breadth of testing pursued.MethodsA single-institution cohort was enumerated consisting of patients referred for clinical genetic counseling secondary to risk of HBOC syndrome. This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients seen for genetic counseling; all patients completed an epidemiologic questionnaire and provided personal and family medical histories. Patients meeting guidelines for testing were offered testing at 3 levels: single gene/condition (Single), small panels with highly penetrant genes (Plus), and large panels with high and moderately penetrant genes (Next). Associations between personal or family-related factors and breadth of testing selected were investigated. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Student t and χ2 tests, as appropriate. Joint classification tables were used to test for effect modification, and a log-binomial model was used to compute rate ratios (RR) with a threshold of P < 0.05 considered significant.ResultsWe identified 253 patients who underwent genetic counseling for HBOC syndrome. Most patients were personally affected by cancer (63.6%), reported at least some college (79.2%), met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for BRCA testing (94.5%), and opted to undergo genetic testing (94.1%). Most (84.9%) patients opted for panel testing. An increased likelihood of choosing Next-level testing was found to be associated with patients having any college experience (RR, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–2.30), as well as being unaffected by cancer (RR, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.64).ConclusionsClinical genetic counseling is a highly specialized service, which should be provided to patients at risk of hereditary cancer syndromes. Although some epidemiologic factors can predict a patient's preference for testing breadth, patients were sufficiently able to self-identify the level of testing they were comfortable with after receiving genetic counseling. Most practitioners do not have the time or expertise to provide the degree of counseling needed to enable and empower patients to choose the level of testing they are comfortable with. When available, referral to genetic counselors remains an important component of comprehensive care for women with a personal or family history of cancer suggestive of hereditary risk.


1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon A. Smith ◽  
Bruce A.J. Ponder

The isolation of genes that predispose to familial disease is an important goal in cancer research. The identification of such genes « opens up » the possibility of genetic diagnosis in families so that individuals who are at risk of cancer through inheriting a predisposing mutation can be Identified. Genes that are involved in familial cancer syndromes may also be important in the pathogenesis of sporadic forms of the disease, which are often more common. In the search for genes that predispose to familial breast and ovarian cancer much recent progress has been made. A locus on the long arm of chromosome 17, in the interval 17q12-21, has been identified by genetic linkage, and appears to be responsible for disease in approximately 40 % of breast cancer families and most families that contain breast and ovarian cancer. The region containing this locus, which has been called BRCA1, has been narrowed to a 3-4 cM interval defined by THRA1, the thyroid hormone receptor locus alpha, and D17S183, an anonymous microsatellite polymorphism. Loci other than BRCA1 that have been identified appear not only to predispose to breast and/or ovarian tumors, but to tumors at other sites too. A new locus has been identified on chromosome 2 which is linked to hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Families with HNPCC are also at risk of endometrial cancer and tumors of the ovary, amongst other cancer sites. Finally, mutations in the p53 gene are inherited in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare cancer syndrome predisposing to breast tumors, sarcomas, leukemia and other cancers. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is also the only inherited cancer syndrome that predisposes at least in part to breast cancer where the actual predisposing gene is known. For the other cancer syndromes, the cloning of the predisposing genes is eagerly awaited.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3342-3347 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Brannon Traxler ◽  
Monique L. Martin ◽  
Alice S. Kerber ◽  
Cecelia A. Bellcross ◽  
Barbara E. Crane ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1575-1575
Author(s):  
Charles Hendrix Shelton ◽  
Leigh Boehmer ◽  
Christine B. Weldon ◽  
William C. Guenther ◽  
Julia Rachel Trosman ◽  
...  

1575 Background: Genetic testing for at risk non-cancer patients continues to increase (Guo F, et al Cancer 2020). We identified a high risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer in rural eastern North Carolina, and created a systematic approach for genetic screening, counseling and testing. Methods: A family history questionnaire was designed to assess for the risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) using NCCN guidelines, and used at key intake points within the unaffected population to determine eligibility for genetic testing. First it was offered at the time of all mammograms. Second, we offered it in the primary gynecology care setting to capture younger patients not participating in screening mammography. Patients meeting HBOC criteria were sent a letter and two phone calls to schedule genetic counseling. Analysis via descriptive statistics. Results: 3000 rural women screened using our systematic approach to genetic risk assessment. 22.4% (673/3000) of female patients met NCCN criteria for HBOC panel testing. All offered consultation and counseling. With a backlog to see patients due to higher than expected accrual, 217 patients have completed pre-test genetic counseling, 201 completed local 19-gene panel test, and 201 had post-test counseling. Germline mutations (=>1) that predict for genetic susceptibility to cancer(s) occur in 7.8% of our screened and tested population. Currently 1 in 400 patients screened in our unaffected population carry a BRCA mutation, and 1 in 200 carry some pathogenic mutation that increases risk for HBOC. Conclusions: This rural model of screening and prevention of at risk patients for HBOC is successful at detecting pathogenic mutations in unaffected patients before they are diagnosed with cancer. Interestingly, the rate of positivity in the unaffected population (meeting criteria) is as high as the known breast cancer population rate of germline mutations (5-10%), validating the use of testing guidelines with our model. Discovering this susceptibility before a cancer diagnosis resulted in appropriate high risk management with prevention and risk reduction strategies. We plan to expand this model to the male screening population in 2021, and streamline genetic assessment and testing for the larger population at risk by engaging more rural primary care clinics over time to increase testing compliance. We also plan to consider broader gene panels as newer mutations become linked to HBOC. Clinical trial information: UMCIRB 19-001052.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document